Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Nonlocal quantum field theory replaces pointlike localization with a finite phase-space cell.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 11:12 UTC pith:HPMMKPE2

load-bearing objection This extends the author's prior localization claim to phase space under a hypothesized detector kernel that is never derived from the nonlocal theory. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.27387 v2 pith:HPMMKPE2 submitted 2026-06-15 physics.gen-ph

On the Meaning of Localization in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory and On the Limits of a Space-Time Description and the Physical Meaning of Phase Space in a Nonlocal Continuum

E. J. Thompson This is my paper
classification physics.gen-ph
keywords nonlocal quantum field theoryuncertainty principlelocalization widthphase-space cellminimal lengthdetector response kernelvariance additionentire-function regulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a nonlocal uncertainty relation for an ultraviolet-complete theory regulated by entire functions. Under the assumption of an induced equal-time detector response kernel, the observed localization width obeys an exact variance addition law. Adding this to the standard Heisenberg relation produces a bound that recovers ordinary quantum mechanics at low energies but enforces a minimum length of order L_M at high energies. Extending the same variance construction symmetrically to momentum space yields a phase-space uncertainty relation that implies a finite cell rather than arbitrarily sharp localization. This alters the physical meaning of spacetime points while preserving a Lorentz-covariant continuum manifold.

Core claim

In an ultraviolet complete nonlocal quantum field theory, the physical localization width obeys an exact variance addition law with the response kernel generated from the entire-function regulator. When this is combined with the ordinary Heisenberg inequality the result is a nonlocal uncertainty relation whose ultraviolet limit implies a minimal measurable length of order L_M. Symmetrizing the construction to normalized, centered kernels in both position and momentum produces the corresponding phase-space uncertainty relation, which still preserves the conclusions of the original paper while strengthening the claim that nonlocal quantum field theory implies a finite phase-space cell.

What carries the argument

the induced equal-time detector response kernel that broadens observed localization according to an exact variance addition law

Load-bearing premise

The detector response is given by an induced equal-time kernel generated from the entire-function regulator.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures localization width at energies near the nonlocality scale and finds no additional broadening beyond the Heisenberg limit would falsify the variance addition law.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Spacetime remains a Lorentz-covariant continuum at the manifold level, yet pointlike localization ceases to be a physically realizable observable below the nonlocality scale.
  • The nonlocal uncertainty bound reduces exactly to the ordinary Heisenberg relation in the infrared limit when the regulator scale E_M tends to infinity.
  • Nonlocal quantum field theory implies not only a minimal measurable length but a finite phase-space cell whose size is set by the regulator.
  • The same variance construction applies symmetrically once the nonlocality of momentum is taken into account.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-space cell is fundamental, high-energy collider searches for minimal-length effects would have to be reinterpreted as measurements of cell volume rather than a simple length cutoff.
  • The construction suggests that any ultraviolet-complete nonlocal theory must revise the operational meaning of microcausality while keeping the manifold description intact.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that, under the hypothesis of an induced equal-time detector response kernel (normalized and centered), the observed localization width in an ultraviolet-complete nonlocal QFT obeys an exact variance-addition law. Combining this with the standard Heisenberg relation produces a nonlocal uncertainty principle that recovers the usual bound when E_M → ∞ but implies a minimal localization length ∼ L_M in the UV; the position-sector result is extended symmetrically to momentum, yielding a finite phase-space cell while preserving Lorentz-covariant spacetime at the manifold level. The work is presented as a follow-up to a prior paper by the same author and includes discussion of implications for locality, microcausality, and experimental tests.

Significance. If the response-kernel hypothesis can be derived from the nonlocal regulator and shown to be consistent with the theory’s propagator and microcausality, the result would strengthen the physical interpretation of nonlocal QFT by replacing a minimal-length statement with a finite phase-space cell. The reduction to the local limit and the preservation of continuum Lorentz covariance are conceptually attractive, but the significance remains conditional on the un-derived central assumption.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (first paragraph): the variance-addition law and the subsequent nonlocal uncertainty relation are stated to follow from the “hypothesises of an induced equal time detector response kernel,” yet no section derives this kernel from the entire-function form factor, the Wightman function, or any concrete detector model in the nonlocal theory.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (second paragraph): the position-sector result is imported from a previous paper by the same author; the present manuscript does not supply an independent derivation that incorporates the nonlocality of momentum without additional external assumptions.
  3. [Abstract] The claim that the bound implies a minimal localization length of order L_M and a finite phase-space cell rests entirely on the normalized, centered response-kernel hypothesis; without a demonstration that such a kernel emerges from the nonlocal propagator or respects microcausality, the UV conclusions are not internally justified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typographical error (“hypothesises” should be “hypotheses”).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments correctly identify that our results rest on a physically motivated hypothesis regarding the detector response kernel. We address each point below and indicate where the manuscript can be revised for clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (first paragraph): the variance-addition law and the subsequent nonlocal uncertainty relation are stated to follow from the “hypothesises of an induced equal time detector response kernel,” yet no section derives this kernel from the entire-function form factor, the Wightman function, or any concrete detector model in the nonlocal theory.

    Authors: We agree that the equal-time detector response kernel is introduced as a hypothesis rather than derived from the Wightman functions or a specific detector model. The hypothesis is motivated by the smearing induced by the entire-function regulator of the nonlocal theory, as established in our prior work. We will revise the abstract and add a short subsection clarifying the status of this assumption and its physical motivation, while noting that a complete first-principles derivation lies beyond the scope of the present follow-up. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (second paragraph): the position-sector result is imported from a previous paper by the same author; the present manuscript does not supply an independent derivation that incorporates the nonlocality of momentum without additional external assumptions.

    Authors: The manuscript is framed as a follow-up that symmetrizes the earlier position-sector result to momentum. We will incorporate a concise recap of the position variance law (with references) to make the extension self-contained and reduce reliance on the prior paper. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that the bound implies a minimal localization length of order L_M and a finite phase-space cell rests entirely on the normalized, centered response-kernel hypothesis; without a demonstration that such a kernel emerges from the nonlocal propagator or respects microcausality, the UV conclusions are not internally justified.

    Authors: The UV conclusions do depend on the response-kernel hypothesis. The manuscript discusses consistency with Lorentz covariance and microcausality at the manifold level but does not derive the kernel from the propagator. We will expand the discussion to include further arguments for consistency with the theory’s properties and explicitly flag the derivation of the kernel as an open question for future work. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Derivation of the induced equal-time detector response kernel directly from the nonlocal propagator together with explicit verification of microcausality.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption of the response kernel and builds on a previous paper by the same author; the nonlocality scale parameters are introduced without independent calibration.

free parameters (2)
  • E_M
    Nonlocality scale or cutoff energy appearing in the infrared limit E_M to infinity
  • L_M
    Minimal localization length of order 1/E_M in the ultraviolet
axioms (1)
  • ad hoc to paper hypothesis of an induced equal time detector response kernel
    Invoked to prove the variance addition law for observed localization width
invented entities (2)
  • response kernel no independent evidence
    purpose: To model the nonlocality in detector response and broaden localization
    Introduced to derive the broadening of localization width
  • nonlocal phase-space cell no independent evidence
    purpose: To describe finite resolution in combined position-momentum space
    Derived from symmetric treatment of position and momentum nonlocality

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5846 in / 1810 out tokens · 68672 ms · 2026-06-30T11:12:03.279401+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

First: In this paper we explore and derive an uncertainty principle for an ultraviolet complete nonlocal quantum field theory where under our hypothesises of an induced equal time detector response kernel, we then prove that the observed localization width obeys an exact variance addition law. Then when we combine this with the ordinary Heisenberg inequality and we obtain a nonlocal uncertainty relation. The bound reduces to the usual local relation in the infrared or local limit when $E_M \to \infty$, while in the ultraviolet it implies a minimal localization length of order $L_M$. We go on to explain what this means for locality, microcausality, the interpretation of spacetime points, and the ultraviolet structure of quantum field theory. In this formulation we note and prove that spacetime will remain a Lorentz covariant continuum at the level of the manifold description but pointlike localization ceases to be a physically realizable observable notion below the nonlocality scale. Second: In a previous paper we derived an uncertainty relation for nonlocal fields by showing that the physical localization width in nonlocal quantum field theory is broadened by the response kernel generated from the entire-function regulator. In this follow up we will reinterpret that result as just the position-sector limit of a more symmetric statement as we did not take into account the inherent nonlocality of momentum. We find under normalized, centered response kernels for both position and momentum, we prove the variance laws and derive the corresponding nonlocal phase-space uncertainty relation. The result still preserves the conclusions of the original paper all while strengthening the interpretation as nonlocal quantum field theory implies not merely a minimal measurable length, but a finite phase-space cell. We also explore experimental routes to test the theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27387 by E. J. Thompson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The underlying local localization density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison between the local uncertainty [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. One-loop vacuum-polarization contributions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The ideal local position density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The ideal canonical momentum distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of local, one-sided nonlocal, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A First Bound on the Moffat Energy and Thorium--229 Clock as a Probe of the Nonlocal Time-Energy Structure

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    First bounds on the nonlocality scale E_M from 229Th nuclear clock data: E_M > 22.3 MeV directly, > 1.72 GeV with nuclear enhancement, and TeV-scale for assumed nuclear reference energies.

  2. An inquiry on the Absence of Fermion Doubling and why the Nielsen-Ninomiya Theorem Does Not Apply to Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0

    A continuum nonlocal Dirac operator multiplied by an invertible zero-free entire function has exactly the same kernel and finite-momentum zero set as the ordinary Dirac operator, so fermion doubling is absent.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 142 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I(Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1963), Ch. 52

    work page 1963

  2. [2]

    Asymptotic Renormalization: On the Status of Wick Ordering in QED and Nonlocal UV Completions

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Renormalization: On the Status of Wick Ordering in QED and Nonlocal UV Completions.” In Press Annalen der Physik, (2026)

    work page 2026

  3. [3]

    The Conformal Transformations of a Space of Four Dimensions and Their Applications to Geometrical Optics,

    H. Bateman, “The Conformal Transformations of a Space of Four Dimensions and Their Applications to Geometrical Optics,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.s2-7, 70– 89 (1909)

    work page 1909

  4. [4]

    The Principle of Relativity in Elec- trodynamics and an Extension Thereof,

    E. Cunningham, “The Principle of Relativity in Elec- trodynamics and an Extension Thereof,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.s2-8, 77–98 (1910)

    work page 1910

  5. [5]

    What Maxwell Theory ind̸= 4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance,

    S. El-Showk, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov, “What Maxwell Theory ind̸= 4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance,” Nucl. Phys. B848, 578–593 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    A New Improved Energy-Momentum Tensor,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. Coleman, and R. Jackiw, “A New Improved Energy-Momentum Tensor,”Annalen der Physik(N.Y.)59, 42–73 (1970)

    work page 1970

  7. [7]

    Invariante Variationsprobleme,

    E. Noether, “Invariante Variationsprobleme,” Nachr. d. K¨ onig. Gesellsch. d. Wiss. zu G¨ ottingen, Math.-Phys. Klasse1918, 235–257 (1918)

    work page 1918

  8. [8]

    ¨Uber die Erhaltungss¨ atze der Elek- trodynamik,

    E. Bessel-Hagen, “ ¨Uber die Erhaltungss¨ atze der Elek- trodynamik,” Math. Ann.84, 258–276 (1921)

    work page 1921

  9. [9]

    A short review on Noether’s theorems, gauge symmetries and boundary terms,

    M. Ba˜ nados and I. A. Reyes, “A short review on Noether’s theorems, gauge symmetries and boundary terms,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, 1630021 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    An Identity in Quantum Electrodynam- ics,

    J. C. Ward, “An Identity in Quantum Electrodynam- ics,” Phys. Rev.78, 182 (1950)

    work page 1950

  11. [11]

    On the Generalized Ward Identity,

    Y. Takahashi, “On the Generalized Ward Identity,” Nuovo Cimento6, 371–375 (1957)

    work page 1957

  12. [12]

    On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Po- larization,

    J. Schwinger, “On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Po- larization,” Phys. Rev.82, 664–679 (1951)

    work page 1951

  13. [13]

    Gauge Invariance and Mass,

    J. Schwinger, “Gauge Invariance and Mass,” Phys. Rev. 125, 397–398 (1962)

    work page 1962

  14. [14]

    Gauge Invariance and Mass. II,

    J. Schwinger, “Gauge Invariance and Mass. II,” Phys. Rev.128, 2425–2429 (1962)

    work page 1962

  15. [15]

    Comment on a “Comment on ‘Standard Model Mass Spectrum and In- teractions In The Holomorphic Unified Field Theory

    J. W. Moffat and E. J. Thompson, “Comment on a “Comment on ‘Standard Model Mass Spectrum and In- teractions In The Holomorphic Unified Field Theory” arXiv:2508.08510 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Sur la th´ eorie ondulatoire des ´ electrons posi- tifs et n´ egatifs,

    A. Proca, “Sur la th´ eorie ondulatoire des ´ electrons posi- tifs et n´ egatifs,” J. Phys. Radium7, 347–353 (1936)

    work page 1936

  17. [17]

    Die Wechselwirkungskr¨ afte in der Elektrodynamik und in der Feldtheorie der Kernkr¨ afte,

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, “Die Wechselwirkungskr¨ afte in der Elektrodynamik und in der Feldtheorie der Kernkr¨ afte,” Helv. Phys. Acta11, 225–244 (1938)

    work page 1938

  18. [18]

    The Stueckelberg field,

    H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, “The Stueckelberg field,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19, 3265–3348 (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    Photon and gravi- ton mass limits,

    A. S. Goldhaber and M. M. Nieto, “Photon and gravi- ton mass limits,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 939–979 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Dirac versus Reduced Quantization of the Poincar\'{e} Symmetry in Scalar Electrodynamics

    R. J. Epp and G. Kunstatter, “Dirac versus Re- duced Quantization of the Poincar´ e Symmetry in Scalar Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D51, 781–791 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9403065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  21. [21]

    Gravitation und Elektrizit¨ at,

    H. Weyl, “Gravitation und Elektrizit¨ at,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)1918, 465– 480 (1918)

    work page 1918

  22. [22]

    Gravitation and the Electron,

    H. Weyl, “Gravitation and the Electron,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.15, 323–334 (1929)

    work page 1929

  23. [23]

    Historical roots of gauge invariance,

    J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, “Historical roots of gauge invariance,” Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 663–680 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Revisiting the conformal invariance of Maxwell’s equations in curved spacetime,

    J. Cˆ ot´ e, V. Faraoni, and A. Giusti, “Revisiting the conformal invariance of Maxwell’s equations in curved spacetime,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.51, 117 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Asymptotic Microcausality: Defor- mations of Local Quantum Field Theory

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Microcausality: Defor- mations of Local Quantum Field Theory.” In Press An- nalen der Physik, (2026)

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Asymptotic Microcausality to Macrocausality: Complete Quantum Electrodynamics and the Regulated S-Matrix

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Microcausality to Macrocausality: Complete Quantum Electrodynamics and the Regulated S-Matrix.” In Press Annalen der Physik, (2026)

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    Eine scheinbare Abschw¨ achung der Lokalit¨ atsbedingung. II,

    H.-J. Borchers and K. Pohlmeyer, “Eine scheinbare Abschw¨ achung der Lokalit¨ atsbedingung. II,” Commun. Math. Phys.8, 269 (1968)

    work page 1968

  28. [28]

    Origin of the quantum group symmetry in 3d quantum gravity,

    M. Dupuis, L. Freidel, F. Girelli, A. Osumanu, and J. Rennert, “Origin of the quantum group symmetry in 3d quantum gravity,” arXiv:2006.10105 [gr-qc]. 23 ON THE LIMITS OF A SP ACE-TIME DESCRIPTION AND THE PHYSICAL MEANING OF PHASE SP ACE IN A NONLOCAL CONTINUUM ABSTRACT In a previous paper we derived an uncertainty re- lation for nonlocal fields by showin...

    work page arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    Uber den anschaulichen In- halt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,

    W. Heisenberg, “Uber den anschaulichen In- halt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Z. Phys.43, 172–198 (1927)

    work page 1927

  30. [30]

    Heisenberg’s Original Derivation of the Uncertainty Principle and Its Universally Valid Reformulations,

    M. Ozawa, “Heisenberg’s Original Derivation of the Uncertainty Principle and Its Universally Valid Reformulations,” Curr. Sci.109, 2006–2016 (2015), arXiv:1507.02010 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen,

    E. H. Kennard, “Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen,” Z. Phys.44, 326–352 (1927)

    work page 1927

  32. [32]

    The uncertainty principle,

    H. P. Robertson, “The uncertainty principle,” Phys. Rev.34, 163–164 (1929)

    work page 1929

  33. [33]

    Zum Heisenbergschen Unschar- feprinzip,

    E. Schrodinger, “Zum Heisenbergschen Unschar- feprinzip,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys.- Math. Kl.19, 296–303 (1930). 41

    work page 1930

  34. [34]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That, Benjamin, New York (1964)

    work page 1964

  35. [35]

    Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Parti- cles, Algebras, Springer, Berlin (1992)

    R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Parti- cles, Algebras, Springer, Berlin (1992)

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge (1995)

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    Algebraic Quantum Field Theory – an introduction,

    C. J. Fewster and K. Rejzner, “Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: An Introduction,” arXiv:1904.04051 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1904

  38. [38]

    Algebraic Quan- tum Field Theory: Objectives, Methods, and Results,

    D. Buchholz and K. Fredenhagen, “Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: Objectives, Methods, and Results,” arXiv:2305.12923 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Erweiterung des Unbes- timmtheitsprinzips fur die relativistische Quanten- theorie,

    L. Landau and R. Peierls, “Erweiterung des Unbes- timmtheitsprinzips fur die relativistische Quanten- theorie,” Z. Phys.69, 56–69 (1931)

    work page 1931

  40. [40]

    Zur Frage der Messbarkeit der elektromagnetischen Feldgrossen,

    N. Bohr and L. Rosenfeld, “Zur Frage der Messbarkeit der elektromagnetischen Feldgrossen,” Mat.-fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk.12, no. 8 (1933)

    work page 1933

  41. [41]

    Field and Charge Mea- surements in Quantum Electrodynamics,

    N. Bohr and L. Rosenfeld, “Field and Charge Mea- surements in Quantum Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev.78, 794–798 (1950)

    work page 1950

  42. [42]

    Asymptotic Renormalization: On the Status of Wick Ordering in QED and Non- local UV Completions,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Renormalization: On the Status of Wick Ordering in QED and Non- local UV Completions,” Annalen der Physik, in press (2026)

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    Quantum Field Theory in Terms of Vacuum Expectation Values,

    A. S. Wightman, “Quantum Field Theory in Terms of Vacuum Expectation Values,” Phys. Rev.101, 860–866 (1956), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.101.860

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.101.860 1956

  44. [44]

    Impossible Measurements on Quantum Fields

    R. D. Sorkin, “Impossible measurements on quan- tum fields,” arXiv:gr-qc/9302018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Quantum Fields and Local Measurements,

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch, “Quantum Fields and Local Measurements,” Commun. Math. Phys.378, 851–889 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Measurement in Quantum Field Theory,

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch, “Measurement in Quantum Field Theory,” arXiv:2304.13356 [math- ph]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Phys.54, 26 (2024), arXiv:2307.08524 [quant-ph]

    M. Papageorgiou and D. Fraser, “Eliminating the ‘Impossible’: Recent Progress on Local Mea- surement Theory for Quantum Field Theory,” arXiv:2307.08524 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Asymptotic Microcausality: De- formations of Local Quantum Field Theory,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Microcausality: De- formations of Local Quantum Field Theory,” An- nalen der Physik, in press (2026)

    work page 2026

  49. [49]

    Uber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum,

    M. Planck, “Uber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum,” Ann. Phys.309, 553–563 (1901)

    work page 1901

  50. [50]

    Uber einen die Erzeugung und Ver- wandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt,

    A. Einstein, “Uber einen die Erzeugung und Ver- wandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt,” Ann. Phys.17, 132–148 (1905)

    work page 1905

  51. [51]

    A Direct Photoelectric Determina- tion of Planck’s ‘h’,

    R. A. Millikan, “A Direct Photoelectric Determina- tion of Planck’s ‘h’,” Phys. Rev.7, 355–388 (1916)

    work page 1916

  52. [52]

    A Quantum Theory of the Scat- tering of X-Rays by Light Elements,

    A. H. Compton, “A Quantum Theory of the Scat- tering of X-Rays by Light Elements,” Phys. Rev. 21, 483–502 (1923)

    work page 1923

  53. [53]

    The Conservation of Photons,

    G. N. Lewis, “The Conservation of Photons,” Na- ture118, 874–875 (1926)

    work page 1926

  54. [54]

    Recherches sur la theorie des quanta,

    L. de Broglie, “Recherches sur la theorie des quanta,” Ph.D. thesis, Universite de Paris (1924)

    work page 1924

  55. [55]

    Diffraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel,

    C. Davisson and L. H. Germer, “Diffraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel,” Phys. Rev.30, 705–740 (1927)

    work page 1927

  56. [56]

    Diffraction of Cath- ode Rays by a Thin Film,

    G. P. Thomson and A. Reid, “Diffraction of Cath- ode Rays by a Thin Film,” Nature119, 890 (1927)

    work page 1927

  57. [57]

    On the Meaning of Localization in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory,

    E. J. Thompson, “On the Meaning of Localization in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory,” Annalen der Physik, 538, 6, (2026)

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Localized States for Elementary Systems,

    T. D. Newton and E. P. Wigner, “Localized States for Elementary Systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.21, 400–406 (1949)

    work page 1949

  59. [59]

    On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non- Relativistic Limit,

    L. L. Foldy and S. A. Wouthuysen, “On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non- Relativistic Limit,” Phys. Rev.78, 29–36 (1950)

    work page 1950

  60. [60]

    On the Localizability of Quan- tum Mechanical Systems,

    A. S. Wightman, “On the Localizability of Quan- tum Mechanical Systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.34, 845–872 (1962)

    work page 1962

  61. [61]

    Covariant position operators, spin, and localizability in relativistic quantum the- ory,

    G. N. Fleming, “Covariant position operators, spin, and localizability in relativistic quantum the- ory,” Phys. Rev.137, B188–B197 (1965)

    work page 1965

  62. [62]

    Bemerkungen zur Unitaraquivalenz von Lorentzinvarianten Feldern,

    H. Reeh and S. Schlieder, “Bemerkungen zur Unitaraquivalenz von Lorentzinvarianten Feldern,” Nuovo Cimento22, 1051–1068 (1961)

    work page 1961

  63. [63]

    Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory,

    G. C. Hegerfeldt, “Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory,” Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)7, 716–725 (1998)

    work page 1998

  64. [64]

    In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot Be a Relativistic Quantum Mechan- ics of (Localizable) Particles,

    D. B. Malament, “In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot Be a Relativistic Quantum Mechan- ics of (Localizable) Particles,” inPerspectives on Quantum Reality, edited by R. Clifton, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996), pp. 1–10

    work page 1996

  65. [65]

    No Place for Par- ticles in Relativistic Quantum Theories?

    H. Halvorson and R. Clifton, “No Place for Par- ticles in Relativistic Quantum Theories?” Philos. Sci.69, 1–28 (2002), doi:10.1086/338939

    work page doi:10.1086/338939 2002

  66. [66]

    Unsharp Localization and Causality in Relativistic Quantum Theory,

    P. Busch, “Unsharp Localization and Causality in Relativistic Quantum Theory,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.32, 6535–6546 (1999)

    work page 1999

  67. [67]

    Busch, P

    P. Busch, P. Lahti, J.-P. Pellonpaa, and K. Ylinen, Quantum Measurement, Springer, Cham (2016)

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    Asymptotic Locality: Rectifying Newton–Wigner and Foldy–Wouthuysen Localiza- tion,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Locality: Rectifying Newton–Wigner and Foldy–Wouthuysen Localiza- tion,” Annalen der Physik, in press (2026)

    work page 2026

  69. [69]

    Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheo- rie,

    H. Weyl, “Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheo- rie,” Z. Phys.46, 1–46 (1927)

    work page 1927

  70. [70]

    Weyl,Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, S

    H. Weyl,Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, S. Hirzel, Leipzig (1928); English translation:The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York (1950)

    work page 1928

  71. [71]

    J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin (1932); En- glish translation:Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955)

    work page 1932

  72. [72]

    P. A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Me- chanics, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1930)

    work page 1930

  73. [73]

    The uncertainty prin- ciple,

    J. Hilgevoord and J. Uffink, “The uncertainty prin- ciple,” inThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Stanford University (2001; subsequent revisions)

    work page 2001

  74. [74]

    On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium,

    E. P. Wigner, “On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium,” Phys. Rev.40, 42 749–759 (1932)

    work page 1932

  75. [75]

    On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics,

    H. J. Groenewold, “On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics,” Physica12, 405–460 (1946)

    work page 1946

  76. [76]

    Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory,

    J. E. Moyal, “Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory,” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.45, 99–124 (1949)

    work page 1949

  77. [77]

    Distribution functions in physics: Funda- mentals,

    M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, “Distribution functions in physics: Funda- mentals,” Phys. Rep.106, 121–167 (1984)

    work page 1984

  78. [78]

    G. B. Folland,Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)

    work page 1989

  79. [79]

    T. L. Curtright, D. B. Fairlie, and C. K. Zachos,A Concise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space, World Scientific, Singapore (2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [80]

    Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space: An Introduction,

    E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, “Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space: An Introduction,” arXiv:2208.08682 [quant-ph] (2022), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2208.08682

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.08682 2022

Showing first 80 references.