Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A continuum nonlocal Dirac theory with a nowhere-vanishing entire form factor has exactly the same free fermion zeros and poles as ordinary Dirac theory, so fermion doubling is absent.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 07:05 UTC pith:M4RNK3I6

load-bearing objection Elementary but correctly proved: continuum entire-function nonlocal Dirac has no extra free zeros; the packaged tests are the real addition. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05485 v1 pith:M4RNK3I6 submitted 2026-07-06 hep-th hep-lathep-ph

An inquiry on the Absence of Fermion Doubling and why the Nielsen-Ninomiya Theorem Does Not Apply to Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory

J. W. Moffat , Arvin Kouroshnia This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-lathep-ph
keywords fermion doublingNielsen-Ninomiya theoremnonlocal quantum field theoryentire form factorDirac operatorkernel preservationfalse doublerscontinuum regularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether nonlocal quantum field theory inherits the fermion-doubling pathology familiar from lattice formulations. It answers no: when the ordinary Dirac operator is multiplied by the reciprocal of an entire function that never vanishes at finite argument, the resulting nonlocal operator has exactly the same kernel, finite-momentum zero set, and free one-particle poles as the local theory. The Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem does not force doubling here because that theorem assumes local lattice operators on a compact periodic Brillouin zone; continuum nonlocal theories have neither. The authors supply a general species-counting criterion, tests that separate genuine from false (truncation-induced) doublers, and a procedure that distinguishes mathematical zeros from healthy physical fermions. Finite polynomial truncations of the form factor can manufacture spurious zeros, but those artifacts disappear in the full entire-function theory.

Core claim

If the nonlocal Dirac operator is written DF = AF D0 where AF is invertible (in particular AF = F^{-1}(□D/EM^{2}) for an entire function F with F(z) ≠ 0 at every finite complex z), then ker DF = ker D0. In the translation-invariant vacuum the finite-momentum zeros and free propagator poles therefore coincide with those of the ordinary Dirac operator, so the number of free fermion species equals the intended number and doubling is absent.

What carries the argument

The invertible-deformation theorem for kinetic operators: left-multiplication by an operator that is injective on the range of K preserves the kernel (ker(AK) = ker K); when the multiplier is nowhere singular in momentum space the finite zero set of det K is likewise unchanged. Applied to AF = F^{-1}(□D/EM^{2}) this immediately yields the no-doubling result for continuum nonlocal Dirac (and Weyl) operators.

Load-bearing premise

The form factor must be an entire function that never hits zero at any finite complex number, so the multiplying operator stays invertible on the fields under study; if it develops a finite zero or loses injectivity the kernel equality fails.

What would settle it

Exhibit a finite four-momentum p* that is inequivalent to the ordinary mass shell, at which the exact untruncated nonlocal inverse propagator DF(p) has a vanishing determinant (or a Dirac-regular zero with positive-residue physical pole), while the form factor remains entire and zero-free; such a zero would refute the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Continuum nonlocal regulators built from zero-free entire functions can keep the free fermion spectrum of the local parent theory without lattice-style species multiplication.
  • Any apparent extra modes that appear only after a finite Taylor truncation of the form factor must be classified as truncation artifacts, not Nielsen–Ninomiya doublers.
  • The same invertibility argument applies to free scalars, vectors and gravitons: an everywhere-nonsingular multiplier cannot create new free mass shells or poles.
  • Mathematical zeros of the free kinetic operator must still be checked for non-removable positive-residue poles before they count as physical fermion species.
  • Later lattice discretizations of the continuum nonlocal theory can re-introduce ordinary Brillouin-zone doublers; those would be artifacts of the lattice map, not of the continuum nonlocal theory itself.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kernel-preservation logic suggests that many other entire-function UV completions used in nonlocal gravity or string-inspired models should likewise leave free particle content unaltered, provided the form factor stays zero-free.
  • A practical numerical check would be to track candidate roots of successive Taylor truncations of a concrete form factor (e.g., exp) and verify they either recede to infinity or disappear as the order increases.
  • If interactions generate additional poles only through the self-energy, those poles are dynamical bound states or resonances rather than regulator-induced doublers; the free-theory test already separates the two cases.
  • The paper’s distinction between mathematical and physical doubling could be used as a diagnostic checklist for any proposed non-local or higher-derivative fermion regulator.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that continuum nonlocal Dirac theories regulated by a zero-free entire form factor F of the covariant d’Alembertian do not suffer fermion doubling. With DF = AF D0 and AF = F^{-1}(□_D/E_M^{2}) invertible, the kernel of DF equals that of the ordinary Dirac operator D0 (Theorems 2 and 6); in the translation-invariant vacuum the finite-momentum zero set and free one-particle poles coincide with those of D0 (determinant identities such as Eqs. 60, 204, 231). Nielsen–Ninomiya does not apply because there is no compact Brillouin torus and the kinetic operator is nonlocal. The authors supply a general species-counting criterion (Theorem 3), tests distinguishing genuine vs false and mathematical vs physical doubling, and a false-doubling theorem for finite polynomial truncations of F (Theorem 7). They conclude that the full continuum nonlocal theory has N_species = N_target.

Significance. If the free continuum spectral claim holds under the stated invertibility hypotheses, it cleanly separates continuum entire-function nonlocal QFT from lattice doubling and from truncation artifacts. The kernel and determinant arguments are elementary and correctly proved; the general invertible-deformation theorem, the species-counting criterion, and the genuine/false and mathematical/physical tests are useful organizing tools for the literature. The paper also settles a concrete historical claim about the 1991 nonlocal construction. Strengths include explicit hypotheses (F entire and zero-free), clear free-vs-interacting and continuum-vs-lattice distinctions, and a falsifiable condition under which the result would fail (a finite zero of F or loss of injectivity of AF).

major comments (2)
  1. The free continuum result is sound under the stated hypotheses, but the domain hypotheses for unbounded operators in nontrivial gauge backgrounds (before Theorem 6 and after Eq. 32) remain schematic. A short paragraph specifying the common domain (or Sobolev-type space) on which AF is injective on Ran D0 would make the kernel equality fully rigorous without changing the claim.
  2. The interacting discussion (around Eqs. 96–99 and 234–236) correctly notes that self-energy can generate extra poles, but the paper should state more sharply that the no-doubling theorem is only a free/kinematical statement and does not by itself control the interacting spectrum unless an effective factorization Γ_A^{(2)} = A_eff Γ_0^{(2)} with invertible A_eff is assumed. This is already flagged but should be elevated to an explicit limitation of the main claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. The long MP3/Gibbs-phenomenon analogy in the finite-truncation section is distracting and can be cut or moved to a footnote; the mathematical content of Theorem 7 is clear without it.
  2. Several typos and formatting issues: “INTRODUCTORY CONSIDERATIONS” spacing, “ti test” for “to test”, “an an algebraic zero”, and inconsistent use of DF vs D_F and AF vs A_F.
  3. Heavy self-citation to related Moffat/Thompson nonlocal papers is understandable for context but could be trimmed where the references are not load-bearing for the kernel argument.
  4. The historical discussion of the Cline/Woodard comment is useful for motivation but could be shortened; the mathematical criterion already settles the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: kernel equality is elementary operator algebra under an explicit zero-free hypothesis, not a self-referential fit or load-bearing self-citation of the target claim.

full rationale

The central derivation (Theorems 2 and 6, Corollary 4) states that if DF = AF D0 with AF injective on Ran D0 (in particular AF = F^{-1}(□_D/E_M^{2}) for entire F with F(z) ≠ 0 for all finite z), then ker DF = ker D0 and the finite-momentum zero set of det DF(p) coincides with that of det D0(p). This is ordinary linear algebra / determinant multiplicativity; the zero-free condition is listed as an explicit admissibility hypothesis (Eq. 30), not derived from the no-doubling conclusion. The Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem is correctly distinguished by its compact Brillouin-torus + locality hypotheses, which the continuum nonlocal operator lacks. Self-citations to the 1991 Evens–Moffat–Kleppe–Woodard construction and later Moffat/Thompson nonlocal papers supply historical background and the form-factor ansatz, but the spectral identity itself is proved in-line without relying on those citations as unverified uniqueness theorems. Finite-truncation artifacts and free-vs-interacting distinctions are separated rather than smuggled. No fitted parameter is renamed a prediction, no uniqueness is imported circularly, and the result does not reduce by construction to its inputs. Score 1 only for the minor presence of author-overlapping background citations that are not load-bearing for the kernel proof.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard linear-algebra/operator facts plus three domain assumptions about the form factor and the continuum setting; no free parameters are fitted and no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption F is entire (holomorphic on all of ℂ) and satisfies F(z) ≠ 0 for every finite z, with F(0)=1.
    Stated as admissibility conditions (30); invertibility of AF and the kernel equality rest on it.
  • domain assumption The operator AF = F^{-1}(□_D/E_M^{2}) is well-defined and invertible on a common domain containing the range of D0.
    Required for Theorems 2 and 6; asserted for both vacuum and gauge backgrounds subject to domain hypotheses.
  • domain assumption Spacetime and momentum space remain continuous (M = ℝ^d, not a compact Brillouin torus).
    Places the theory outside the topological hypotheses of Nielsen-Ninomiya; used throughout the continuum analysis.
  • standard math Multiplicativity of the determinant for finite-dimensional matrices and the elementary fact that injective left multiplication preserves kernels.
    Used in Eqs. (50), (60), (126), (180); classical linear algebra.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 34170 in / 2746 out tokens · 25763 ms · 2026-07-11T07:05:55.624078+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we will examine if nonlocal quantum field theory will suffer from the fermion doubling pathology. We find that for a nonlocal Dirac theory, that no additional fermion species are introduced. This is provided that the form factor is nonvanishing at every point. The proof follows from the invertibility of the entire-function operator, which implies that the nonlocal Dirac operator has exactly the same kernel and finite-momentum zero set as the original local Dirac operator. We will distinguish this result from the standard Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem, which applies local lattice Fermions on a compact Brillouin zone. We provide a general criterion for fermion doubling, a test for Genuine and false doubling, and then a test procedure for mathematical and physical fermion doubling. We then will go on to distinguish this result from finite derivative truncations, which can introduce spurious polynomial zeros. We then conclude that fermion doubling is absent in the full continuum nonlocal theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A First Bound on the Moffat Energy and Thorium--229 Clock as a Probe of the Nonlocal Time-Energy Structure

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    First bounds on the nonlocality scale E_M from 229Th nuclear clock data: E_M > 22.3 MeV directly, > 1.72 GeV with nuclear enhancement, and TeV-scale for assumed nuclear reference energies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    ,[p(N)]; (106)

    the quotient zero setZ/∼contains finitely many isolated classes [p(1)], . . . ,[p(N)]; (106)

  2. [2]

    every zero class is Dirac-regular, with multi- plicitym i; 3.D(p)is invertible away from these zero classes. Then the exact number of massless Dirac fermion species described by the quadratic theory is Nspecies = NX i=1 mi.(107) If the intended continuum theory containsN target fermion species, then the theory is free of fermion doubling if and only if Ns...

  3. [3]

    the same finite-momentum zero set

  4. [4]

    the same nullity at every momentum

  5. [5]

    the same Dirac multiplicity at every regular zero

  6. [6]

    This shows that an everywhere-invertible deforma- tion cannot introduce fermion doublers

    the same total number of fermion species. This shows that an everywhere-invertible deforma- tion cannot introduce fermion doublers. The proof appears as at every momentum: detD ′(p) = detA(p) detD(p) detB(p).(126) Since detA(p) and detB(p) are nonzero, we have: detD ′(p) = 0⇐ ⇒detD(p) = 0.(127) Moreover we have: kerD ′(p) =B(p) −1 kerD(p),(128) so the ker...

    1991

  7. [7]

    Confinement of Quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,” Phys. Rev. D10, 2445–2459 (1974)

    1974

  8. [8]

    Hamiltonian Formu- lation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian Formu- lation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. D11, 395–408 (1975)

    1975

  9. [9]

    Strong-Coupling Field Theories. II. Fermions and Gauge Fields on a Lattice,

    S. D. Drell, M. Weinstein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Strong-Coupling Field Theories. II. Fermions and Gauge Fields on a Lattice,” Phys. Rev. D14, 1627– 1647 (1976)

    1976

  10. [10]

    Lattice Fermions,

    L. Susskind, “Lattice Fermions,” Phys. Rev. D16, 3031–3039 (1977)

    1977

  11. [11]

    Quarks and Strings on a Lattice,

    K. G. Wilson, “Quarks and Strings on a Lattice,” inNew Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics, Part A, edited by A. Zichichi (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), pp. 69–142

    1977

  12. [12]

    Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Trian- gle Anomaly,

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit, “Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Trian- gle Anomaly,” Nucl. Phys. B183, 103–140 (1981)

    1981

  13. [13]

    Montvay and G

    I. Montvay and G. M¨ unster,Quantum Fields on a Lattice(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    1994

  14. [14]

    H. J. Rothe,Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduc- tion, 4th ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    Smit,Introduction to Quantum Fields on a Lattice(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    J. Smit,Introduction to Quantum Fields on a Lattice(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    2002

  16. [16]

    Gattringer and C

    C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang,Quantum Chromo- dynamics on the Lattice: An Introductory Presen- tation, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 788 (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    2010

  17. [17]

    Fermion Doubling in Loop Quantum Gravity,

    J. Barnett, “Fermion Doubling in Loop Quantum Gravity,” Bachelor of Independent Studies thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Fermion Doubling in Loop Quantum Gravity,

    J. Barnett and L. Smolin, “Fermion Doubling in Loop Quantum Gravity,” arXiv:1507.01232 [gr-qc] (2015)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    No Fermion Doubling in Quantum Geometry,

    R. Gambini and J. Pullin, “No Fermion Doubling in Quantum Geometry,” Phys. Lett. B749, 374–375 (2015), arXiv:1506.08794 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Fermion Cou- pling to Loop Quantum Gravity: Canonical For- mulation,

    J. Lewandowski and C. Zhang, “Fermion Cou- pling to Loop Quantum Gravity: Canonical For- mulation,” Phys. Rev. D105, 124025 (2022), arXiv:2112.08865 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Fermions in Loop Quantum Gravity and Resolution of Doubling Prob- lem,

    C. Zhang, H. Liu, and M. Han, “Fermions in Loop Quantum Gravity and Resolution of Doubling Prob- lem,” Class. Quantum Grav.40, 205022 (2023), arXiv:2212.00933 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    A No-Go Theo- rem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “A No-Go Theo- rem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,” Phys. Lett. B105, 219–223 (1981)

    1981

  23. [23]

    Absence of Neu- trinos on a Lattice. I. Proof by Homotopy Theory,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of Neu- trinos on a Lattice. I. Proof by Homotopy Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B185, 20–40 (1981); Erratum: Nucl. Phys. B195, 541 (1982)

    1981

  24. [24]

    Absence of Neu- trinos on a Lattice. II. Intuitive Topological Proof,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of Neu- trinos on a Lattice. II. Intuitive Topological Proof,” Nucl. Phys. B193, 173–194 (1981)

    1981

  25. [25]

    A Proof of the Nielsen–Ninomiya The- orem,

    D. Friedan, “A Proof of the Nielsen–Ninomiya The- orem,” Commun. Math. Phys.85, 481–490 (1982)

    1982

  26. [26]

    Chiral-Invariant Regularization of Fermions on the Lattice,

    C. Rebbi, “Chiral-Invariant Regularization of Fermions on the Lattice,” Phys. Lett. B186, 200– 204 (1987)

    1987

  27. [27]

    An Intro- duction to Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

    S. Chandrasekharan and U.-J. Wiese, “An Intro- duction to Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.53, 373–418 (2004), arXiv:hep- lat/0405024

    arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Chiral Symmetry and Lattice Fermions,

    D. B. Kaplan, “Chiral Symmetry and Lattice Fermions,” arXiv:0912.2560 [hep-lat] (2009)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,” Phys. Rev. D25, 2649–2657 (1982)

    1982

  30. [30]

    A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice,

    D. B. Kaplan, “A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice,” Phys. Lett. B288, 342– 347 (1992), arXiv:hep-lat/9206013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  31. [31]

    Chiral Fermions from Lattice Bound- aries,

    Y. Shamir, “Chiral Fermions from Lattice Bound- aries,” Nucl. Phys. B406, 90–106 (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9303005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  32. [32]

    Chiral Determi- nant as an Overlap of Two Vacua,

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, “Chiral Determi- nant as an Overlap of Two Vacua,” Nucl. Phys. B 412, 574–606 (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9307006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  33. [33]

    Perfect Lat- tice Action for Asymptotically Free Theories,

    P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, “Perfect Lat- tice Action for Asymptotically Free Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B414, 785–814 (1994), arXiv:hep- 26 lat/9308004

    arXiv 1994

  34. [34]

    Exactly Massless Quarks on the Lat- tice,

    H. Neuberger, “Exactly Massless Quarks on the Lat- tice,” Phys. Lett. B417, 141–144 (1998), arXiv:hep- lat/9707022

    arXiv 1998

  35. [35]

    More About Exactly Massless Quarks on the Lattice,

    H. Neuberger, “More About Exactly Massless Quarks on the Lattice,” Phys. Lett. B427, 353– 355 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9801031

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Exact Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice and the Ginsparg–Wilson Relation,

    M. L¨ uscher, “Exact Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice and the Ginsparg–Wilson Relation,” Phys. Lett. B 428, 342–345 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9802011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    Axial Symmetry in Lat- tice Theories,

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit, “Axial Symmetry in Lat- tice Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B144, 536–540 (1978)

    1978

  38. [38]

    The Vacuum Polariza- tion with SLAC Lattice Fermions,

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit, “The Vacuum Polariza- tion with SLAC Lattice Fermions,” Phys. Lett. B 85, 100–102 (1979)

    1979

  39. [39]

    A Test of the SLAC Lattice Fermion Method in Two-Dimensional QED,

    G. T. Bodwin and E. V. Kovacs, “A Test of the SLAC Lattice Fermion Method in Two-Dimensional QED,” Phys. Rev. D35, 3198–3214 (1987)

    1987

  40. [40]

    Can a Non-Local Lattice Fermion Formulation Avoid the Doubling Problem?

    M. Campostrini, G. Curci, and A. Pelissetto, “Can a Non-Local Lattice Fermion Formulation Avoid the Doubling Problem?” Phys. Lett. B193, 279–282 (1987)

    1987

  41. [41]

    Nonlocal Lattice Fermions: Absence of Chiral Anomalies and Fermion Doubling,

    A. Pelissetto, “Nonlocal Lattice Fermions: Absence of Chiral Anomalies and Fermion Doubling,” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)182, 177–214 (1988)

    1988

  42. [42]

    Non-Local Quantum Theory of the Scalar Field,

    G. V. Efimov, “Non-Local Quantum Theory of the Scalar Field,” Commun. Math. Phys.5, 42–56 (1967)

    1967

  43. [43]

    A Proof of the Unitarity of theS-Matrix in a Nonlocal Quan- tum Field Theory,

    V. A. Alebastrov and G. V. Efimov, “A Proof of the Unitarity of theS-Matrix in a Nonlocal Quan- tum Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.31, 1–24 (1973)

    1973

  44. [44]

    Nonlocal Gauge Theories,

    N. V. Krasnikov, “Nonlocal Gauge Theories,” Theor. Math. Phys.73, 1184–1190 (1987) [Teor. Mat. Fiz.73, 235–244 (1987)]

    1987

  45. [45]

    Finite Nonlocal Gauge Field The- ory,

    J. W. Moffat, “Finite Nonlocal Gauge Field The- ory,” Phys. Rev. D41, 1177–1184 (1990)

    1990

  46. [46]

    Nonlocal Regularizations of Gauge The- ories,

    D. Evens, J. W. Moffat, G. Kleppe, and R. P. Woodard, “Nonlocal Regularizations of Gauge The- ories,” Phys. Rev. D43, 499–519 (1991)

    1991

  47. [47]

    Nonlocal Yang– Mills,

    G. Kleppe and R. P. Woodard, “Nonlocal Yang– Mills,” Nucl. Phys. B388, 81–112 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9203016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  48. [48]

    Superrenormalizable Gauge and Gravitational Theories,

    E. T. Tomboulis, “Superrenormalizable Gauge and Gravitational Theories,” arXiv:hep-th/9702146 (1997)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  49. [49]

    Dynamics with Infinitely Many Derivatives: The Initial Value Problem,

    N. Barnaby and N. Kamran, “Dynamics with Infinitely Many Derivatives: The Initial Value Problem,” J. High Energy Phys.02, 008 (2008), arXiv:0709.3968 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    Towards Singularity- and Ghost-Free Theories of Gravity,

    T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazum- dar, “Towards Singularity- and Ghost-Free Theories of Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 031101 (2012), arXiv:1110.5249 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Nonlocal Quantum Gravity: A Review,

    L. Modesto and L. Rachwa l, “Nonlocal Quantum Gravity: A Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730020 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Ghost-Free Infinite Derivative Quantum Field Theory,

    L. Buoninfante, G. Lambiase, and A. Mazum- dar, “Ghost-Free Infinite Derivative Quantum Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B944, 114646 (2019), arXiv:1805.03559 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Comment on ‘Standard Model Mass Spectrum and Interactions in the Holomorphic Uni- fied Field Theory’,

    J. M. Cline, “Comment on ‘Standard Model Mass Spectrum and Interactions in the Holomorphic Uni- fied Field Theory’,” arXiv:2508.05280v2 [hep-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Maybe I confused the doubling problem with the axial vector anomaly in my footnote,

    James M. Cline, private communications, “Maybe I confused the doubling problem with the axial vector anomaly in my footnote,” (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Comment on a ‘Comment on Standard Model Mass Spectrum and Interactions in the Holomorphic Unified Field The- ory’,

    J. W. Moffat and E. J. Thompson, “Comment on a ‘Comment on Standard Model Mass Spectrum and Interactions in the Holomorphic Unified Field The- ory’,” arXiv:2508.08510 [hep-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    On Gauge- Invariant Entire-Function Regulators and UV Finiteness in NonLocal Quantum Field The- ory,

    J. W. Moffat and E. J. Thompson, “On Gauge- Invariant Entire-Function Regulators and UV Finiteness in NonLocal Quantum Field The- ory,” Ann. Phys. (Berlin)538, e70207 (2026), arXiv:2511.11756 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    On Covariance for Entire-Function Deformations of Rela- tivistic Field Theories,

    E. J. Thompson, “On Covariance for Entire-Function Deformations of Rela- tivistic Field Theories,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202604.0706.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202604.0706.v1 2026

  58. [58]

    Asymptotic Micro- causality: Deformations of Local Quan- tum Field Theory,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Micro- causality: Deformations of Local Quan- tum Field Theory,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202601.1874.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202601.1874.v1 2026

  59. [59]

    Asymptotic Locality: Rectifying Newton–Wigner and Foldy– Wouthuysen Localization,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Locality: Rectifying Newton–Wigner and Foldy– Wouthuysen Localization,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202601.2027.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202601.2027.v1 2026

  60. [60]

    Asymptotic Microcausality to Macrocausality: Complete Quantum Electrody- namics and the RegulatedS-Matrix,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Microcausality to Macrocausality: Complete Quantum Electrody- namics and the RegulatedS-Matrix,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202602.0207.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202602.0207.v1 2026

  61. [61]

    On the Meaning of Localization in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory and On the Limits of a Space-Time Description and the Physical Meaning of Phase Space in a Nonlocal Continuum

    E. J. Thompson, “On the Meaning of Localization in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory,” Ann. Phys. (Berlin)538, e70233 (2026), arXiv:2606.27387 [hep- th], doi:10.1002/andp.70233

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/andp.70233 2026

  62. [62]

    Asymptotic Renormalization: On the Status of Wick Ordering in QED and Nonlocal UV Completions,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Renormalization: On the Status of Wick Ordering in QED and Nonlocal UV Completions,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202601.2049.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202601.2049.v1 2026

  63. [63]

    On the Structure of Local Observables in String Field Theory,

    E. J. Thompson and A. Kouroshnia, “On the Structure of Local Observables in String Field Theory,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202603.2318.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202603.2318.v1 2026

  64. [64]

    On Recent measurements of Toponium Threshold Enhancement in Entire- Function-Regulated Nonlocal Quantum Field The- ory,

    E. J. Thompson, “On Recent measurements of Toponium Threshold Enhancement in Entire- Function-Regulated Nonlocal Quantum Field The- ory,” arXiv:2507.16831 [physics.gen-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    De Sitter Cores from Non- Local Quantum Field Theories,

    E. J. Thompson, “De Sitter Cores from Non- Local Quantum Field Theories,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202601.2225.v1

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202601.2225.v1 2026

  66. [66]

    Gravitational-Wave Echoes in Non-Local Quantum Gravity,

    E. J. Thompson, “Gravitational-Wave Echoes in Non-Local Quantum Gravity,” manuscript (2026)

    2026

  67. [67]

    UV-Finite Four-Loop Gluon- Fusion Higgs Form Factor at N 3LO from Gauge- Invariant Entire-Function Regulation,

    E. J. Thompson, “UV-Finite Four-Loop Gluon- Fusion Higgs Form Factor at N 3LO from Gauge- Invariant Entire-Function Regulation,” manuscript (2026)

    2026

  68. [68]

    On the Problem of Ostrogradsky in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory,

    E. J. Thompson, “On the Problem of Ostrogradsky in Non-Local Quantum Field Theory,” manuscript in preparation (2026). 27

    2026

  69. [69]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon,Methods of Modern Mathe- matical Physics, Vol. I: Functional Analysis, revised and enlarged ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1980)

    1980

  70. [70]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory(Addison–Wesley, Read- ing, Massachusetts, 1995)

    1995

  71. [71]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I: Foundations(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1995)

    1995

  72. [72]

    The Quantum Theory of the Elec- tron,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “The Quantum Theory of the Elec- tron,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A117, 610–624 (1928)

    1928

  73. [73]

    Elektron und Gravitation. I,

    H. Weyl, “Elektron und Gravitation. I,” Z. Phys. 56, 330–352 (1929)

    1929

  74. [74]

    Spinoranalyse,

    B. L. van der Waerden, “Spinoranalyse,” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wis- senschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse1929, 100–109 (1928)

    1928

  75. [75]

    Zur Quantenmechanik des magnetischen Elektrons,

    W. Pauli, “Zur Quantenmechanik des magnetischen Elektrons,” Z. Phys.43, 601–623 (1927)

    1927

  76. [76]

    Two- Component Spinor Techniques and Feynman Rules for Quantum Field Theory and Supersymmetry,

    H. K. Dreiner, H. E. Haber, and S. P. Martin, “Two- Component Spinor Techniques and Feynman Rules for Quantum Field Theory and Supersymmetry,” Phys. Rept.494, 1–196 (2010), arXiv:0812.1594 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  77. [77]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000)

    2000

  78. [78]

    Locality and Exceptional Points in Pseudo-Hermitian Physics,

    J. L. Barnett, “Locality and Exceptional Points in Pseudo-Hermitian Physics,” Ph.D. thesis, Univer- sity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2023)

    2023

  79. [79]

    Axial-Vector Vertex in Spinor Electro- dynamics,

    S. L. Adler, “Axial-Vector Vertex in Spinor Electro- dynamics,” Phys. Rev.177, 2426–2438 (1969)

    1969

  80. [80]

    A PCAC Puzzle:π 0 →γγ in theσ-Model,

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC Puzzle:π 0 →γγ in theσ-Model,” Nuovo Cim. A60, 47–61 (1969)

    1969

Showing first 80 references.