pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29575 · v2 · pith:HETK53KGnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.AI

TF-MoE: Time-Frequency Mixture-of-Experts for Efficient Speech Separation

Qinzhe Hu , Chenda Li , Wangyou Zhang , Shujie Liu , Yan Lu , Yanmin Qian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 06:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.AI
keywords speech separationmixture of expertstime-frequency modelingefficient neural networksConformer backboneedge device deployment
0
0 comments X

The pith

TF-MoE adds dynamic time and frequency expert selection to raise speech separation quality at fixed low compute cost.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces TF-MoE as a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture for speech separation that alternates between time-wise and frequency-wise modules, each choosing experts dynamically per frame or mel band. This design is placed on a mel-band-splitting Conformer backbone to grow model capacity while keeping inference cost nearly unchanged. The central result is that the approach delivers higher separation scores than prior compact models under the same computation budget. If the claim holds, edge devices could run higher-quality separation without extra hardware resources.

Core claim

TF-MoE introduces alternating time-wise and frequency-wise MoE modules that perform dynamic expert selection per frame or mel band on a mel-band-splitting Conformer backbone, raising separation performance under strict computation limits while adding almost no inference cost.

What carries the argument

Alternating time-wise and frequency-wise MoE modules with per-frame or per-mel-band dynamic expert selection.

If this is right

  • TF-MoE outperforms BSRNN by 3.8 dB SDR on Libri2Mix at comparable 4.1 GMACs/s inference cost.
  • Model capacity grows without a proportional rise in inference cost for speech separation tasks.
  • The architecture is positioned for deployment on edge devices that face tight compute budgets.
  • Performance gains appear consistently when computation cost is held fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same alternating selection pattern could be tested on other audio tasks such as enhancement or diarization that also split time and frequency processing.
  • If the experts truly specialize, one could inspect activation patterns to see whether time experts handle transients and frequency experts handle harmonics.
  • Combining the MoE structure with further pruning or quantization might push the operating point even lower while preserving the reported gains.

Load-bearing premise

Dynamic expert selection in the time and frequency modules adds negligible extra computation beyond the stated GMACs figure and produces real specialization instead of duplicated work.

What would settle it

Run the model on target edge hardware and measure end-to-end latency and power; if the measured cost exceeds the reported 4.1 GMACs/s or the SDR gain disappears when overhead is included, the claim does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29575 by Chenda Li, Qinzhe Hu, Shujie Liu, Wangyou Zhang, Yan Lu, Yanmin Qian.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the proposed TF-MoE framework. (A) The TF-Conformer backbone; (B) The proposed TF-MoE model; (C) The MoE Conformer block, where standard feed-forward modules are replaced by MoE FFNs; (D.1): The standard feed-forward module; (D.2) The MoE feed-forward module with top-J sparse routing. 2. Methodology 2.1. Backbone Model We first introduce a new SS model, TF-Conformer, as our back￾bone, which is … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization of the expert routing in the first Feed Forward module of the fifth TF-MoE block. The top spec￾trogram displays the time-frequency representation of the in￾put signal comprising female-only (frames 0-100), mixed (100- 200), and male-only (200-300) segments. The lower bar shows the routing decisions of T-MoE experts in the T-module along the time axis, while the right bar shows the routing dec… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in speech separation (SS) have led to compact front-end models with small parameter sizes, yet their high computational cost remains a major barrier for deployment on edge devices. To address this, we propose TF-MoE, a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that enhances model capacity with almost no increase in inference cost. Our method introduces dynamic expert specialization in time and frequency dimensions through alternating time-wise and frequency-wise MoE modules, each dynamically selecting experts per frame or mel band. Built upon a mel-band-splitting Conformer backbone, TF-MoE achieves strong performance on SS tasks under low-compute settings. Experimental results demonstrate that TF-MoE consistently improves separation performance under computation cost constraints, outperforming BSRNN by +3.8 dB SDR on Libri2Mix with comparable 4.1 GMACs/s inference cost. This positions TF-MoE as a promising candidate for edge-device deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TF-MoE, a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture for speech separation built on a mel-band-splitting Conformer backbone. It introduces alternating time-wise and frequency-wise MoE modules that perform dynamic expert selection per frame or mel band. The central empirical claim is that this yields consistent gains under compute constraints, specifically +3.8 dB SDR improvement over BSRNN on Libri2Mix at a comparable inference cost of 4.1 GMACs/s, positioning the model for edge deployment.

Significance. If the efficiency and performance claims are substantiated with full cost accounting and specialization evidence, the work would offer a practical route to higher-capacity speech separation models without proportional compute growth, which is relevant for on-device audio processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline result (+3.8 dB SDR at 4.1 GMACs/s) rests on the unverified assertion that alternating time/frequency MoE modules add negligible inference cost beyond the stated GMACs figure. No derivation or breakdown of MACs for the gating networks, expert loading, or dynamic routing is supplied, so it is impossible to confirm that the comparison to BSRNN remains valid once routing overhead is included.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'genuine specialization' via per-frame/per-mel-band expert selection lacks supporting statistics (e.g., expert utilization histograms or activation overlap metrics). Without these, the efficiency advantage could be an artifact of redundant computation paths rather than sparse capacity increase.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the computational cost accounting and evidence of specialization. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline result (+3.8 dB SDR at 4.1 GMACs/s) rests on the unverified assertion that alternating time/frequency MoE modules add negligible inference cost beyond the stated GMACs figure. No derivation or breakdown of MACs for the gating networks, expert loading, or dynamic routing is supplied, so it is impossible to confirm that the comparison to BSRNN remains valid once routing overhead is included.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit breakdown strengthens the efficiency claim. The reported 4.1 GMACs/s was obtained via standard FLOPs profiling of the complete architecture (including gating and routing) on the target hardware, but the abstract and main text do not provide the component-wise derivation. We will add a dedicated paragraph and supplementary table in the revised manuscript that decomposes the MACs for the time-wise and frequency-wise MoE modules, gating networks, and routing overhead to allow direct verification against BSRNN. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'genuine specialization' via per-frame/per-mel-band expert selection lacks supporting statistics (e.g., expert utilization histograms or activation overlap metrics). Without these, the efficiency advantage could be an artifact of redundant computation paths rather than sparse capacity increase.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not include quantitative evidence of expert specialization. To demonstrate that the per-frame and per-mel-band routing produces non-redundant expert usage, we will add expert utilization histograms, load-balancing statistics, and activation overlap metrics (e.g., average pairwise expert co-activation) to the experiments section of the revised paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical architecture proposal with reported experimental outcomes

full rationale

The paper introduces TF-MoE as a sparse MoE architecture on a mel-band-splitting Conformer backbone and reports measured SDR gains and GMACs/s figures from experiments on Libri2Mix. No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. The +3.8 dB claim is presented as an observed experimental result rather than a quantity forced by construction from model definitions or prior self-citations. The derivation chain is therefore empty and self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method implicitly assumes that sparse expert routing incurs no hidden compute cost and that mel-band splitting is compatible with the MoE modules.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5705 in / 1123 out tokens · 24459 ms · 2026-07-01T06:40:56.571525+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Introduction Speech separation (SS) has made great progress with deep learning [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], emerging as a critical enabler for a wide range of real-world applications. Driven by growing pri- vacy concerns [9], the demand for low-latency interaction [10], and the need for offline capability in network-unavailable envi- ronments [11, 12], there...

  2. [2]

    We propose a competitive mel-band-splitting Conformer backbone that balances performance and efficiency, achieving a +2.5 dB SDR improvement over BSRNN on Libri2Mix at com- parable computational cost

  3. [3]

    It outperforms Conformer backbone by +1.3 dB SDR on Libri2Mix

    We propose TF-MoE, a sparse Mixture-of-Experts framework that replaces the feed-forward modules in both the time and frequency Conformer blocks with sparsely-gated ex- pert layers, scaling model capacity without increasing compu- tational cost. It outperforms Conformer backbone by +1.3 dB SDR on Libri2Mix

  4. [4]

    TF-MoE: Time-Frequency Mixture-of-Experts for Efficient Speech Separation

    Comprehensive ablation studies validate the complemen- tary nature of sparse MoE routing and Conformer on both tem- poral and frequency dimensions. Furthermore, visual analysis of the gating policies reveals an explicit structural specialization on different acoustic patterns. arXiv:2606.29575v2 [cs.SD] 30 Jun 2026 Feed Forward / MoE Multi-head Self Atten...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Methodology 2.1. Backbone Model We first introduce a new SS model, TF-Conformer, as our back- bone, which is inspired by the band-split RNN (BSRNN) [6] with two key modifications: (i) the manually designed sub- band splitting is replaced with mel-scale [30] band splitting, and (ii) the RNN sequence modeling modules are replaced with Conformer [31] blocks....

  6. [6]

    Experimental Setup Datasets & Configuration:Experiments are conducted on the Libri2Mix (16kHz, min) dataset from LibriMix [33]

    Experiments 3.1. Experimental Setup Datasets & Configuration:Experiments are conducted on the Libri2Mix (16kHz, min) dataset from LibriMix [33]. The input spectrogram is extracted using a 32 ms Hanning window with an 8 ms shift, and split intoK=80 mel-scale [30] sub-bands. Unless otherwise stated, models use hidden dimensionN= 32 Table 1:Separation result...

  7. [7]

    free lunch

    Conclusion We proposed TF-MoE, a highly efficient time-frequency Mixture-of-Experts framework, to overcome the capacity- computation bottleneck in the state-of-the-art speech separa- tion. By integrating sparse expert routing into a dual-path Con- former backbone, our model successfully converts newly added parameters into separation performance almost wi...

  8. [8]

    2021ZD0201500, in part by the Na- tional Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No

    Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by the China STI 2030–Major Projects under Grant No. 2021ZD0201500, in part by the Na- tional Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. U25A20409, and in part by the SJTU Med-X (Medicine & Engineering) Translational Research Grant under Grant No. YG2025LC09

    2030

  9. [9]

    Generative AI Use Disclosure During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used genera- tive AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, GLM, Gemini) for language pol- ishing and grammar checking to improve the readability of the manuscript. All scientific content, methodology design, and ex- perimental analysis were conducted and verified solely by the authors, who ta...

  10. [10]

    Supervised speech separation based on deep learning: An overview,

    D. Wang and J. Chen, “Supervised speech separation based on deep learning: An overview,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Au- dio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1702– 1726, 2018

    2018

  11. [11]

    Permutation invari- ant training of deep models for speaker-independent multi-talker speech separation,

    D. Yu, M. Kolbæk, Z. Tan, and J. Jensen, “Permutation invari- ant training of deep models for speaker-independent multi-talker speech separation,” Mar. 2017, pp. 241–245

    2017

  12. [12]

    Conv-TasNet: Surpassing Ideal Time– Frequency Magnitude Masking for Speech Separation,

    Y . Luo and N. Mesgarani, “Conv-TasNet: Surpassing Ideal Time– Frequency Magnitude Masking for Speech Separation,” vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1256–1266, Aug. 2019

    2019

  13. [13]

    Speech Enhancement with Score-Based Generative Models in the Complex STFT Do- main,

    S. Welker, J. Richter, and T. Gerkmann, “Speech Enhancement with Score-Based Generative Models in the Complex STFT Do- main,” inInterspeech 2022. ISCA, Sep. 2022, pp. 2928–2932

    2022

  14. [14]

    Tf-gridnet: Making time-frequency domain models great again for monaural speaker separation,

    Z.-Q. Wang, S. Cornell, S. Choi, Y . Lee, B.-Y . Kim, and S. Watan- abe, “Tf-gridnet: Making time-frequency domain models great again for monaural speaker separation,” inICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  15. [15]

    Efficient Monaural Speech Enhancement with Universal Sample Rate Band-Split RNN,

    J. Yu and Y . Luo, “Efficient Monaural Speech Enhancement with Universal Sample Rate Band-Split RNN,” Jun. 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  16. [16]

    URGENT Challenge: Universality, Robustness, and Generalizability For Speech Enhancement,

    W. Zhang, R. Scheibler, K. Saijo, S. Cornell, C. Li, Z. Ni, A. Kumar, J. Pirklbauer, M. Sach, S. Watanabe, T. Fingscheidt, and Y . Qian, “URGENT Challenge: Universality, Robustness, and Generalizability For Speech Enhancement,” 2024, pp. 4868– 4872

    2024

  17. [17]

    Interspeech 2025 URGENT Speech Enhancement Challenge,

    K. Saijo, W. Zhang, S. Cornell, R. Scheibler, C. Li, Z. Ni, A. Ku- mar, M. Sach, Y . Fu, W. Wang, T. Fingscheidt, and S. Watanabe, “Interspeech 2025 URGENT Speech Enhancement Challenge,” in Interspeech 2025, 2025, pp. 858–862

    2025

  18. [18]

    The voiceprivacy 2024 challenge evaluation plan,

    N. Tomashenko, X. Miao, P. Champion, S. Meyer, X. Wang, E. Vincent, M. Panariello, N. Evans, J. Yamagishi, and M. Todisco, “The voiceprivacy 2024 challenge evaluation plan,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02677, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Icassp 2023 deep noise suppression challenge,

    H. Dubey, A. Aazami, V . Gopal, B. Naderi, S. Braun, R. Cutler, A. Ju, M. Zohourian, M. Tang, M. Golestanehet al., “Icassp 2023 deep noise suppression challenge,”IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing, vol. 5, pp. 725–737, 2024

    2023

  20. [20]

    Tinylstms: Effi- cient neural speech enhancement for hearing aids,

    I. Fedorov, M. Stamenovic, C. Jensen, L.-C. Yang, A. Mandell, Y . Gan, M. Mattina, and P. N. Whatmough, “Tinylstms: Effi- cient neural speech enhancement for hearing aids,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11138, 2020

    work page arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Low latency speech enhancement for hearing aids using deep filtering,

    H. Schr ¨oter, T. Rosenkranz, A.-N. Escalante-B, and A. Maier, “Low latency speech enhancement for hearing aids using deep filtering,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Lan- guage Processing, vol. 30, pp. 2716–2728, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    Dual-Path RNN: Effi- cient Long Sequence Modeling for Time-Domain Single-Channel Speech Separation,

    Y . Luo, Z. Chen, and T. Yoshioka, “Dual-Path RNN: Effi- cient Long Sequence Modeling for Time-Domain Single-Channel Speech Separation,” Barcelona, May 2020, pp. 46–50

    2020

  23. [23]

    Attention Is All You Need In Speech Separation,

    C. Subakan, M. Ravanelli, S. Cornell, M. Bronzi, and J. Zhong, “Attention Is All You Need In Speech Separation,” Jun. 2021, pp. 21–25

    2021

  24. [24]

    Skim: Skipping Mem- ory Lstm for Low-Latency Real-Time Continuous Speech Sepa- ration,

    C. Li, L. Yang, W. Wang, and Y . Qian, “Skim: Skipping Mem- ory Lstm for Low-Latency Real-Time Continuous Speech Sepa- ration,” Singapore, May 2022, pp. 681–685

    2022

  25. [25]

    Tiger: Time-frequency in- terleaved gain extraction and reconstruction for efficient speech separation,

    M. Xu, K. Li, G. Chen, and X. Hu, “Tiger: Time-frequency in- terleaved gain extraction and reconstruction for efficient speech separation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01469, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Stack Less, Repeat More: A Block Reusing Approach for Progressive Speech En- hancement,

    J. Kim, U.-H. Shin, J. Ko, and H.-M. Park, “Stack Less, Repeat More: A Block Reusing Approach for Progressive Speech En- hancement,” May 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Beyond Performance Plateaus: A Comprehensive Study on Scal- ability in Speech Enhancement,

    W. Zhang, K. Saijo, J.-w. Jung, C. Li, S. Watanabe, and Y . Qian, “Beyond Performance Plateaus: A Comprehensive Study on Scal- ability in Speech Enhancement,” inProc. Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 1740–1744

    2024

  28. [28]

    Predictive Skim: Contrastive Pre- dictive Coding for Low-Latency Online Speech Separation,

    C. Li, Y . Wu, and Y . Qian, “Predictive Skim: Contrastive Pre- dictive Coding for Low-Latency Online Speech Separation,” Jun. 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  29. [29]

    CheapNET: Improving Light- weight speech enhancement network by projected loss function,

    K. Tan, B. Dai, J. Li, and W. Mao, “CheapNET: Improving Light- weight speech enhancement network by projected loss function,” Nov. 2023

    2023

  30. [30]

    TF-SkiMNet: Speech En- hancement Based on Inplace Modeling and Skipping Memory in Time-Frequency Domain,

    Z. Li, S. He, J. Bai, and X. Zhang, “TF-SkiMNet: Speech En- hancement Based on Inplace Modeling and Skipping Memory in Time-Frequency Domain,” 2025, pp. 5143–5147

    2025

  31. [31]

    A Comprehensive Survey of Mixture-of- Experts: Algorithms, Theory, and Applications,

    S. Mu and S. Lin, “A Comprehensive Survey of Mixture-of- Experts: Algorithms, Theory, and Applications,” Apr. 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer,

    N. Shazeer, A. Mirhoseini, K. Maziarz, A. Davis, Q. Le, G. Hin- ton, and J. Dean, “Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer,” Jan. 2017

    2017

  33. [33]

    Building a great multi-lingual teacher with sparsely-gated mixture of experts for speech recognition,

    K. Kumatani, R. Gmyr, F. C. Salinas, L. Liu, W. Zuo, D. Patel, E. Sun, and Y . Shi, “Building a great multi-lingual teacher with sparsely-gated mixture of experts for speech recognition,” Jan. 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts,

    N. Du, Y . Huang, A. M. Dai, S. Tong, D. Lepikhin, Y . Xu, M. Krikun, Y . Zhou, A. W. Yu, O. Firat, B. Zoph, L. Fedus, M. P. Bosma, Z. Zhou, T. Wang, E. Wang, K. Webster, M. Pellat, K. Robinson, K. Meier-Hellstern, T. Duke, L. Dixon, K. Zhang, Q. Le, Y . Wu, Z. Chen, and C. Cui, “GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts,” inProce...

    2022

  35. [35]

    DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ulti- mate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Mod- els,

    D. Dai, C. Deng, C. Zhao, R. X. Xu, H. Gao, D. Chen, J. Li, W. Zeng, X. Yu, Y . Wu, Z. Xie, Y . K. Li, P. Huang, F. Luo, C. Ruan, Z. Sui, and W. Liang, “DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ulti- mate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Mod- els,” Jan. 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    CLIP-MoE: Towards Building Mixture of Experts for CLIP with Diversified Multiplet Upcycling,

    J. Zhang, X. Qu, T. Zhu, and Y . Cheng, “CLIP-MoE: Towards Building Mixture of Experts for CLIP with Diversified Multiplet Upcycling,” May 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Speech Enhance- ment using a Deep Mixture of Experts,

    S. E. Chazan, J. Goldberger, and S. Gannot, “Speech Enhance- ment using a Deep Mixture of Experts,” Mar. 2017

    2017

  38. [38]

    Handling Trade-Offs in Speech Separation with Sparsely-Gated Mixture of Experts,

    X. Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Shi, J. Wu, N. Kanda, and T. Yoshioka, “Handling Trade-Offs in Speech Separation with Sparsely-Gated Mixture of Experts,” May 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch,

    J. V olkmann, S. S. Stevens, and E. B. Newman, “A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 8, no. 3 Supplement, p. 208, Jan. 1937

    1937

  40. [40]

    Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition,

    A. Gulati, J. Qin, C.-C. Chiu, N. Parmar, Y . Zhang, J. Yu, W. Han, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y . Wu, and R. Pang, “Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition,” 2020, pp. 5036–5040

    2020

  41. [41]

    Searching for Activation Functions

    P. Ramachandran, B. Zoph, and Q. V . Le, “Searching for activa- tion functions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05941, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Librimix: An open-source dataset for generalizable speech separation,

    J. Cosentino, M. Pariente, S. Cornell, A. Deleforge, and E. Vin- cent, “Librimix: An open-source dataset for generalizable speech separation,”arXiv, 2020

    2020

  43. [43]

    Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts

    ——, “Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    BSS EV AL Toolbox User Guide – Revision 2.0,

    C. F ´evotte, R. Gribonval, and E. Vincent, “BSS EV AL Toolbox User Guide – Revision 2.0,” Report, 2005

    2005

  46. [46]

    SDR – Half-baked or Well Done?

    J. L. Roux, S. Wisdom, H. Erdogan, and J. R. Hershey, “SDR – Half-baked or Well Done?” May 2019, pp. 626–630

    2019

  47. [47]

    Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,

    A. W. Rix, J. G. Beerends, M. P. Hollier, and A. P. Hekstra, “Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,” in 2001 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37221), vol. 2. IEEE, 2001, pp. 749–752

    2001

  48. [48]

    An Algo- rithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech,

    C. H. Taal, R. C. Hendriks, R. Heusdens, and J. Jensen, “An Algo- rithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech,” vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2125–2136, Sep. 2011

    2011

  49. [49]

    SPMamba: State-space model is all you need in speech separation,

    K. Li, G. Chen, R. Yang, and X. Hu, “SPMamba: State-space model is all you need in speech separation,” Sep. 2024

    2024

  50. [50]

    Speech separation using an asynchronous fully recurrent convolutional neural network,

    X. Hu, K. Li, W. Zhang, Y . Luo, J.-M. Lemercier, and T. Gerk- mann, “Speech separation using an asynchronous fully recurrent convolutional neural network,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 22 509–22 522, 2021

    2021

  51. [51]

    An efficient encoder-decoder ar- chitecture with top-down attention for speech separation,

    K. Li, R. Yang, and X. Hu, “An efficient encoder-decoder ar- chitecture with top-down attention for speech separation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15200, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Sudo rm-rf: Efficient net- works for universal audio source separation,

    E. Tzinis, Z. Wang, and P. Smaragdis, “Sudo rm-rf: Efficient net- works for universal audio source separation,” in2020 IEEE 30th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Process- ing (MLSP). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020