pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30176 · v1 · pith:TVAN72CHnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech

Trimers in the Extended Hubbard Model

R. R. Montenegro-Filho , D. R. B. Silva , D. Cogollo , M. D. Coutinho-Filho This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords extended Hubbard modeltrimer chainferrimagnetismphase separationLieb theoremDMRGdoublonshalf-filling
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Lieb ferrimagnetic phase in the trimer extended Hubbard model remains stable up to the phase separation line at V ≳ U/4

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how nearest-neighbor repulsion V affects the Lieb insulating ferrimagnetic phase in the extended Hubbard model on a trimer chain at half-filling with one electron per site. The authors report that the ferrimagnetic phase stays robust even as doublon density increases with V, holding until the phase separation line at V greater than or equal to U over 4. Beyond this point one coexisting phase contains doublons mainly on one sublattice and pairs either with a metallic unsaturated ferromagnetic phase when U is greater than or equal to t or with a singlet phase when U is less than or equal to t. The locations of the phase separation and crossover lines are obtained from density matrix renormalization group calculations on finite chains.

Core claim

The Lieb insulating ferrimagnetic phase remains robust up to the phase separation (PS) line, which is observed at V ≳ U/4, where U is the local Coulomb repulsion. Above the PS line, one of the coexisting phases is primarily populated by doublons on one of the two sublattices of the chain. This phase coexists with a metallic, unsaturated ferromagnetic phase for U ≳ t, and with a singlet phase for U ≲ t, where t is the intra-trimer hopping amplitude.

What carries the argument

Density matrix renormalization group calculations on finite trimer chains to locate the phase separation line and identify the character of coexisting phases

If this is right

  • The ferrimagnetic insulating phase is stable against nearest-neighbor repulsion up to V approximately U/4.
  • Phase separation produces a phase with doublons concentrated on one sublattice.
  • For U greater than or equal to t the second phase is metallic and unsaturated ferromagnetic.
  • For U less than or equal to t the second phase is a singlet.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported stability range may extend to other one-dimensional geometries with similar trimer motifs.
  • Optical-lattice realizations could directly image the predicted sublattice-selective doublon accumulation after phase separation.
  • Mapping the ferromagnetic-to-singlet crossover as a continuous function of U/t would test the boundary between the two coexistence regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The DMRG calculations on finite trimer chains accurately locate the thermodynamic-limit phase boundaries and correctly identify the character of the coexisting phases without significant truncation or finite-size artifacts.

What would settle it

A measurement showing phase separation beginning at a value of V substantially different from U/4, or showing that doublons are not concentrated on one sublattice in the separated phase, would contradict the reported structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30176 by D. Cogollo, D. R. B. Silva, M. D. Coutinho-Filho, R. R. Montenegro-Filho.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the extended Hubbard model for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Static configurations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. DMRG results for the particle and doublon occupan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. DMRG results for particle and doublon spatial aver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. DMRG results for the particle and doublon distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Charge distribution in the phase-separation regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. DMRG results for a chain of size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The phase-separation instability point predicted using ∆max, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. DMRG results for (a) the average of doublon occu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Lieb theorem is a cornerstone of quantum magnetism theory in condensed matter. In this work, we investigate the instability of the Lieb insulating ferrimagnetic phase in the extended Hubbard model on a trimer chain at half-filling, with one electron per site, under increasing the nearest-neighbor Coulomb coupling $V$. Our results show that despite a noticeable increase in doublon density with $V$, the ferrimagnetic insulating phase remains robust up to the phase separation (PS) line, which is observed at $V \gtrsim U/4$, where $U$ is the local Coulomb repulsion. Above the PS line, one of the coexisting phases is primarily populated by doublons on one of the two sublattices of the chain. This phase coexists with a metallic, unsaturated ferromagnetic phase for $U \gtrsim t$, and with a singlet phase for $U \lesssim t$, where $t$ is the intra-trimer hopping amplitude. We estimate the PS and the crossover lines with the help of density matrix renormalization group calculations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines the stability of the Lieb ferrimagnetic insulating phase in the extended Hubbard model on a trimer chain at half filling (one electron per site) as the nearest-neighbor repulsion V is increased. DMRG calculations are used to argue that, despite rising doublon density, the ferrimagnetic phase persists up to a phase-separation boundary at V ≳ U/4; above this line the system phase-separates into a doublon-rich phase on one sublattice coexisting either with an unsaturated ferromagnetic metal (U ≳ t) or a singlet phase (U ≲ t).

Significance. If the numerical location of the phase-separation line and the character of the coexisting phases are confirmed, the work would establish a concrete limit on the robustness of Lieb ferrimagnetism against extended interactions in a quasi-one-dimensional geometry and would supply falsifiable predictions for the nature of the high-V phases.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / DMRG section] Abstract and numerical-methods description: the central claim that the ferrimagnetic phase remains stable up to the PS line at V ≳ U/4 rests entirely on DMRG data, yet no chain lengths, bond dimensions, truncation-error thresholds, or finite-size extrapolations are reported. Without these controls the reported position of the PS boundary and the identification of the coexisting phases cannot be assessed for truncation or boundary artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states “one electron per site” at half-filling; this is standard but could be clarified by explicitly noting that the trimer chain has three sites per unit cell.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater transparency in our DMRG methodology. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested details in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / DMRG section] Abstract and numerical-methods description: the central claim that the ferrimagnetic phase remains stable up to the PS line at V ≳ U/4 rests entirely on DMRG data, yet no chain lengths, bond dimensions, truncation-error thresholds, or finite-size extrapolations are reported. Without these controls the reported position of the PS boundary and the identification of the coexisting phases cannot be assessed for truncation or boundary artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of these technical specifications limits the ability to evaluate the numerical reliability of our results. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the methods (and expand the abstract if space permits) that reports: (i) the range of chain lengths used (typically L = 24–96 sites with open boundaries), (ii) the bond dimensions retained (D up to 2000–4000 depending on U/t and V), (iii) the truncation-error thresholds enforced (kept below 10^{-8}–10^{-9}), and (iv) the finite-size extrapolation procedure employed to locate the phase-separation boundary. These additions will allow readers to assess possible truncation or boundary effects on the reported V ≳ U/4 line and on the character of the coexisting phases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct DMRG simulation

full rationale

The paper obtains its central claims (robustness of the ferrimagnetic phase up to the PS line at V ≳ U/4, phase character above it) exclusively from density-matrix renormalization group calculations on the extended Hubbard Hamiltonian. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-definitional relations appear, and the Lieb theorem is cited as an external result rather than derived internally. The provided text contains no self-citations that bear load on the phase boundaries, nor any ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported from prior author work. This is a standard numerical study whose outputs are independent of the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of DMRG ground-state searches for the extended Hubbard Hamiltonian on finite open chains; no additional free parameters beyond the model couplings U, V, t are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DMRG truncation and finite-size effects are small enough to locate thermodynamic phase boundaries reliably.
    Invoked implicitly when the abstract states that DMRG calculations estimate the PS and crossover lines.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1239 out tokens · 20034 ms · 2026-06-30T04:03:23.297292+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and weak coupling [22], and associated with materi- als [3]. In addition, several interesting features were ob- served in the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model in the atomic limit [23] and in a version of the extended Hubbard model in the diamond chain [24]. In this work, we present several relevant properties of the referred extended Hubbard model o...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  3. [3]

    T. Morya, ed.,Electron Correlation and Magnetism in Narrow-Band Systems: Proceedings of the Third Taniguchi International Symposium, Mount Fuji, Japan, November 1–5, 1980, Springer Series in Solid-State Sci- ences (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1981)

    1980

  4. [4]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard Model, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 202213, 239 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard Model: A Computational Per- spective, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 275 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Zheng, C.-M

    B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Science358, 1155 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    H. Xu, H. Shi, E. Vitali, M. Qin, and S. Zhang, Stripes and spin-density waves in the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model: Ground state phase diagram, Physical Review Research4, 013239 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    ˇSimkovic, R

    F. ˇSimkovic, R. Rossi, A. Georges, and M. Ferrero, Origin and fate of the pseudogap in the doped Hubbard model, Science385, eade9194 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    E. H. Lieb and F.-Y. Wu, Absence of Mott transition in an exact solution of the short-range, one-band model in one dimension, Physical Review Letters20, 1445 (1968)

    1968

  10. [10]

    Ha,Quantum Many-body Systems In One Dimension, Series On Advances In Statistical Mechanics (World Sci- entific Publishing Company, 1996)

    Z. Ha,Quantum Many-body Systems In One Dimension, Series On Advances In Statistical Mechanics (World Sci- entific Publishing Company, 1996)

    1996

  11. [11]

    F. H. L. Essler, H. Frahm, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. E. Korepin,The One-Dimensional Hubbard Model (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension, In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 2004)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension, In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 2004)

    2004

  13. [13]

    See, e.g., J. E. Hirsch, Charge-Density-Wave to Spin- Density-Wave Transition in the Extended Hubbard Model, Physical Review Letters53, 2327 (1984), and ref- erences therein

    1984

  14. [14]

    Nakamura, Tricritical behavior in the extended Hub- bard chains, Physical Review B61, 16377 (2000)

    M. Nakamura, Tricritical behavior in the extended Hub- bard chains, Physical Review B61, 16377 (2000)

    2000

  15. [15]

    Sengupta, A

    P. Sengupta, A. W. Sandvik, and D. K. Campbell, Bond- order-wave phase and quantum phase transitions in the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model, Physical Re- view B65, 155113 (2002)

    2002

  16. [16]

    Jeckelmann, Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Half- Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Phys- ical Review Letters89, 236401 (2002)

    E. Jeckelmann, Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Half- Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Phys- ical Review Letters89, 236401 (2002)

    2002

  17. [17]

    Tsuchiizu and A

    M. Tsuchiizu and A. Furusaki, Phase Diagram of the One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model at Half Fill- ing, Physical Review Letters88, 056402 (2002)

    2002

  18. [18]

    A. W. Sandvik, L. Balents, and D. K. Campbell, Ground State Phases of the Half-Filled One-Dimensional Ex- tended Hubbard Model, Physical Review Letters92, 236401 (2004)

    2004

  19. [19]

    Y. Z. Zhang, Dimerization in a Half-Filled One- Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Physical Review Letters92, 246404 (2004)

    2004

  20. [20]

    Ejima and S

    S. Ejima and S. Nishimoto, Phase Diagram of the One-Dimensional Half-Filled Extended Hubbard Model, Physical Review Letters99, 216403 (2007)

    2007

  21. [21]

    Voit, Phase diagram and correlation functions of the 9 half-filled extended Hubbard model in one dimension, Physical Review B45, 4027 (1992)

    J. Voit, Phase diagram and correlation functions of the 9 half-filled extended Hubbard model in one dimension, Physical Review B45, 4027 (1992)

    1992

  22. [22]

    P. G. J. van Dongen, Extended Hubbard model at strong coupling, Physical Review B49, 7904 (1994)

    1994

  23. [23]

    P. G. J. van Dongen, Extended Hubbard model at weak coupling, Physical Review B50, 14016 (1994)

    1994

  24. [24]

    Rojas, S

    O. Rojas, S. M. De Souza, J. Torrico, L. M. Ver´ ıssimo, M. S. S. Pereira, M. L. Lyra, and O. Derzhko, Un- usual low-temperature behavior in the half-filled band of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model in atomic limit, Physical Review E110, 024130 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Rojas, S

    O. Rojas, S. M. de Souza, J. Torrico, L. M. Ver´ ıssimo, M. S. S. Pereira, and M. L. Lyra, Low-temperature pseudo-phase-transition in an extended Hubbard dia- mond chain, Physical Review E103, 042123 (2021), arXiv:2102.10332

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Edge states in trimer lattices, Physical Review A99, 013833 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Verma and T

    S. Verma and T. K. Ghosh, Bulk-boundary correspon- dence in extended trimer Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Physical Review B110, 125424 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    T. Zhao, X. Kang, H. Wang, X. Tian, Q. Chen, Q. Zhang, H. Qin, H. He, G. Yao, and K. Zhan, Interface states and optical coupling functionalities in the super-SSH lattices, Optics Express32, 21487 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W. P. Su, Solitons in conducting polymers, Reviews of Modern Physics60, 781 (1988)

    1988

  30. [30]

    R. Ma, Q. Yan, Y. Luo, Y. Li, X. Wang, C. Lu, X. Hu, and Q. Gong, Information-entropy enabled identifying topological photonic phase in real space, Frontiers of Op- toelectronics17, 11 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    M. Hase, M. Matsuda, K. Kakurai, K. Ozawa, H. Ki- tazawa, N. Tsujii, A. D¨ onni, M. Kohno, and X. Hu, Di- rect observation of the energy gap generating the 1/3 magnetization plateau in the spin-1/2 trimer chain com- pound Cu 3(P2O6OD)2 by inelastic neutron scattering measurements, Physical Review B76, 064431 (2007)

    2007

  32. [32]

    M. Hase, V. Y. Pomjakushin, L. Keller, U. Stuhr, A. D¨ onni, M. Kohno, and A. Tanaka, Evaluation of field- induced magnetic moments in the spin-1/2 antiferromag- netic trimerized chain compound Cu 3(P2O6OD)2, Phys- ical Review B102, 014403 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    B. Gu, G. Su, and S. Gao, Thermodynamics of spin- 1/2 antiferromagnet-antiferromagnet-ferromagnet and ferromagnet-ferromagnet-antiferromagnet trimerized quantum Heisenberg chains, Physical Review B73, 134427 (2006)

    2006

  34. [34]

    Cheng, J

    J.-Q. Cheng, J. Li, Z. Xiong, H.-Q. Wu, A. W. Sandvik, and D.-X. Yao, Fractional and composite excitations of antiferromagnetic quantum spin trimer chains, npj Quan- tum Materials7, 3 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Verkholyak and J

    T. Verkholyak and J. Streˇ cka, Modified strong-coupling treatment of a spin-1/2 Heisenberg trimerized chain de- veloped from the exactly solved Ising-Heisenberg dia- mond chain, Physical Review B103, 184415 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Kikuchi, Y

    H. Kikuchi, Y. Fujii, M. Chiba, S. Mitsudo, T. Ide- hara, T. Tonegawa, K. Okamoto, T. Sakai, T. Kuwai, and H. Ohta, Experimental Observation of the 1/3 Mag- netization Plateau in the Diamond-Chain Compound Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2, Physical Review Letters94, 227201 (2005)

    2005

  37. [37]

    K. C. Rule, A. U. B. Wolter, S. S¨ ullow, D. A. Tennant, A. Br¨ uhl, S. K¨ ohler, B. Wolf, M. Lang, and J. Schreuer, Nature of the Spin Dynamics and 1/3 Magnetization Plateau in Azurite, Physical Review Letters100, 117202 (2008)

    2008

  38. [38]

    F. Aimo, S. Kr¨ amer, M. Klanjˇ sek, M. Horvati´ c, C. Berthier, and H. Kikuchi, Spin Configuration in the 1/3 Magnetization Plateau of Azurite Determined by NMR, Physical Review Letters102, 127205 (2009)

    2009

  39. [39]

    Takano, K

    K. Takano, K. Kubo, and H. Sakamoto, Ground states with cluster structures in a frustrated Heisenberg chain, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter8, 6405 (1996)

    1996

  40. [40]

    Okamoto, T

    K. Okamoto, T. Tonegawa, and M. Kaburagi, Magnetic properties of the S=1/2 distorted diamond chain at T = 0, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter15, 5979 (2003)

    2003

  41. [41]

    Matsuda, K

    M. Matsuda, K. Kakurai, A. A. Belik, M. Azuma, M. Takano, and M. Fujita, Magnetic excitations from the linear Heisenberg antiferromagnetic spin trimer system A3Cu3(PO4)4 (A = Ca, Sr, and Pb), Physical Review B 71, 144411 (2005)

    2005

  42. [42]

    A. A. Belik, A. Matsuo, M. Azuma, K. Kindo, and M. Takano, Long-range magnetic ordering of S = 1/2 linear trimers in A 3Cu3(PO4)4 (A = Ca, Sr, and Pb), Journal of Solid State Chemistry178, 709 (2005)

    2005

  43. [43]

    R. R. Montenegro-Filho, E. J. P. Silva-J´ unior, and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Ground-state phase diagram and ther- modynamics of coupled trimer chains, Physical Review B105, 134423 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    A. M. S. Macˆ edo, M. C. dos Santos, M. D. Coutinho- Filho, and C. A. Macˆ edo, Magnetism and Phase Sepa- ration in Polymeric Hubbard Chains, Physical Review Letters74, 1851 (1995)

    1995

  45. [45]

    Montenegro-Filho and M

    R. Montenegro-Filho and M. Coutinho-Filho, Quasi-one- dimensional quantum ferrimagnets, Physica A: Statisti- cal Mechanics and its Applications357, 173 (2005)

    2005

  46. [46]

    R. R. Montenegro-Filho and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, DopedAB 2 Hubbard chain: Spiral, Nagaoka and resonating-valence-bond states, phase separation, and Luttinger-liquid behavior, Physical Review B74, 125117 (2006)

    2006

  47. [47]

    M. H. Oliveira, E. P. Raposo, and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, AB2 Hubbard chains in the strong-coupling limit: Fer- rimagnetism, Nagaoka and RVB states, phase separa- tion, and Luttinger-liquid behavior, Physical Review B 80, 205119 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    R. R. Montenegro-Filho and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Mag- netic and nonmagnetic phases in dopedAB 2 t−JHub- bard chains, Physical Review B90, 115123 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Lieb and hole-doped ferrimagnetism, spiral, resonating valence-bond states, and phase separation in large-U AB 2 Hubbard chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 195603 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Lieb and D

    E. Lieb and D. Mattis, Ordering Energy Levels of Inter- acting Spin Systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics3, 749 (1962)

    1962

  51. [51]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys- ical Review Letters62, 1201 (1989)

    1989

  52. [52]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters69, 2863 (1992); Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review B48, 10345 (1993); U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormaliza- tion group, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 259 (2005)

    1992

  53. [53]

    Tian and T.-h

    G.-S. Tian and T.-h. Lin, Quasi-one-dimensional or- 10 ganic unsaturated ferromagnetism: Some rigorous re- sults, Physical Review B53, 8196 (1996)

    1996

  54. [54]

    White, and E

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. Stoudenmire, The ITen- sor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.4 (2022)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.4 2022

  55. [55]

    Ogata, M

    M. Ogata, M. U. Luchini, S. Sorella, and F. F. Assaad, Phase diagram of the one-dimensional t - J model, Phys- ical Review Letters66, 2388 (1991)

    1991