Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

The J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice transitions directly from 120° Néel order to a gapless quantum spin liquid at J2/J1 ≈ 0.08, consistent with a U(1) Dirac spin liquid.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 04:02 UTC pith:IVKMEW3C

load-bearing objection PEPS up to D=7 on the J1-J2 triangular model finds a low-J2 transition to a putative gapless QSL, but the Z2-symmetric ansatz may simply be unable to hold topological order at these bond dimensions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.31021 v1 pith:IVKMEW3C submitted 2026-06-30 cond-mat.str-el

Investigation of the J₁-J₂ Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: A study with projected entangled-pair states

Litao Ma , Wei-Lin Tu , Didier Poilblanc , Ji-Yao Chen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords J1-J2 Heisenberg modeltriangular latticequantum spin liquidprojected entangled-pair statesU(1) Dirac spin liquidNéel orderstripe antiferromagnetismZ2 symmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses infinite projected entangled-pair states to study the frustrated J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice under varying symmetry constraints. It identifies a direct transition from the 120° Néel state to a putative quantum spin liquid at J2/J1 ≈ 0.08 where magnetic order collapses. Optimization of Z2-symmetric PEPS wavefunctions up to bond dimension 7 causes spinons to condense while visons confine, removing Z2 topological order. This points to a gapless or critical phase most consistent with a U(1) Dirac spin liquid. The same framework also represents the stripe antiferromagnetic phase through unitary rotation or spontaneous long-range order.

Core claim

The central claim is that the intervening quantum spin liquid phase is gapless or critical and most naturally consistent with a U(1) Dirac spin liquid scenario. This follows from the observation that fully symmetric Z2 resonating valence bond states and generic Z2-symmetric PEPS of larger bond dimension, when optimized, exhibit spinon condensation together with vison confinement, thereby precluding Z2 topological order, while magnetic order collapses at J2/J1 ≈ 0.08.

What carries the argument

Infinite projected entangled-pair states (PEPS) with enforced Z2 symmetry, which serve as variational wavefunctions that can represent both magnetic order and topological states but break toward gapless behavior upon optimization.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that condensation of spinons and confinement of visons observed in optimized Z2-symmetric PEPS at finite bond dimension reflects the intrinsic physics of the true ground state rather than a finite-D artifact or optimization bias.

What would settle it

A simulation at substantially larger bond dimension, or with an independent method such as DMRG, that finds persistent Z2 topological order or deconfined visons inside the putative QSL phase would falsify the gapless U(1) Dirac interpretation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Magnetic order collapses directly at J2/J1 ≈ 0.08 without an intervening ordered phase.
  • Optimized Z2-symmetric PEPS of bond dimension up to 7 exhibit simultaneous spinon condensation and vison confinement.
  • The stripe antiferromagnetic phase is representable inside the PEPS ansatz via unitary rotation or spontaneous order.
  • The QSL phase lacks Z2 topological order and is therefore gapless or critical.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The finding that enforced Z2 symmetry is unstable under optimization suggests that variational searches for topological spin liquids on this lattice may systematically favor gapless states.
  • Similar PEPS or tensor-network studies on related frustrated models could test whether U(1) Dirac liquids generically emerge when Z2 order is disallowed by energetics.
  • The direct transition implies that any experimental signature of the QSL, such as specific-heat or susceptibility data, should match predictions for a Dirac spectrum rather than a gapped Z2 liquid.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses infinite PEPS to study the J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice. It reports a direct transition at J2/J1≈0.08 from the 120° Néel state to a putative QSL, and finds that optimization of Z2-symmetric PEPS (D=3 to D=7) causes spinon condensation and vison confinement, precluding Z2 topological order and favoring a gapless U(1) Dirac spin liquid scenario. The stripe phase is captured via unitary rotation or spontaneous order.

Significance. If the variational conclusions hold, the work supplies concrete numerical evidence on the symmetry and gap structure of the debated intermediate phase, using symmetry-constrained tensor networks to probe excitation behavior. The explicit construction of a D=3 Z2 RVB state and the observation of condensation under optimization are useful technical contributions to the literature on this model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and QSL symmetry discussion] Abstract and the paragraph on the role of PEPS symmetry in the QSL: the central inference that spinon condensation plus vison confinement under Z2-symmetric optimization (D≤7) implies the true ground state lacks Z2 order and is consistent with U(1) Dirac relies on the assumption that the variational manifold is expressive enough to represent a gapped Z2 QSL if it were the ground state. No D-extrapolation of the vison gap, topological order parameters, or entanglement spectrum is reported, so the observed confinement could be an artifact of limited bond dimension rather than intrinsic physics.
  2. [Transition and magnetic order results] Results on the Néel-to-QSL transition (J2/J1≈0.08): the claim of a direct transition signaled by collapse of magnetic order is obtained within the PEPS ansatz; however, the manuscript does not present a direct comparison of the variational energies or order parameters against symmetry-unconstrained or higher-D runs that might stabilize a different intermediate phase, leaving open whether the transition point and the absence of Z2 order are robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the bond dimension D and the definition of the Z2 symmetry projectors should be made uniform between the D=3 RVB construction and the D=7 optimizations.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the variational energy per site for the optimized D=7 states relative to the D=3 RVB state to quantify the improvement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments, indicating where we agree and where revisions or clarifications will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and QSL symmetry discussion] Abstract and the paragraph on the role of PEPS symmetry in the QSL: the central inference that spinon condensation plus vison confinement under Z2-symmetric optimization (D≤7) implies the true ground state lacks Z2 order and is consistent with U(1) Dirac relies on the assumption that the variational manifold is expressive enough to represent a gapped Z2 QSL if it were the ground state. No D-extrapolation of the vison gap, topological order parameters, or entanglement spectrum is reported, so the observed confinement could be an artifact of limited bond dimension rather than intrinsic physics.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit D-extrapolation of the vison gap or topological diagnostics would provide stronger evidence and that its absence leaves open the possibility of a finite-D artifact. At the same time, the consistent flow toward spinon condensation and vison confinement is observed already at D=3 and persists through D=7 when starting from a Z2-symmetric initial state; this trend within an increasingly expressive manifold supports our interpretation that the variational minimum does not accommodate stable Z2 topological order. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the bond-dimension dependence and explicitly acknowledging the lack of extrapolation as a limitation of the present study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Transition and magnetic order results] Results on the Néel-to-QSL transition (J2/J1≈0.08): the claim of a direct transition signaled by collapse of magnetic order is obtained within the PEPS ansatz; however, the manuscript does not present a direct comparison of the variational energies or order parameters against symmetry-unconstrained or higher-D runs that might stabilize a different intermediate phase, leaving open whether the transition point and the absence of Z2 order are robust.

    Authors: The symmetry-constrained optimization is the central methodological choice of the work precisely to test whether a gapped Z2 QSL can be stabilized; an unconstrained ansatz would not isolate this question. The reported transition point is defined by the vanishing of the magnetic order parameter within the same family of states used to probe the QSL. While higher-D or fully unconstrained calculations could in principle alter the location of the transition, they lie outside the scope of the symmetry-focused analysis presented here. We therefore do not plan to add such comparisons, as they would not directly address the stability of Z2 order under the symmetry constraint. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports direct variational optimization of infinite PEPS wavefunctions (D up to 7) on the microscopic J1-J2 Hamiltonian under explicit symmetry constraints. The central observation—that optimized Z2-symmetric states exhibit spinon condensation and vison confinement—is an output of the energy minimization procedure rather than a re-derivation or renaming of any fitted input. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters re-labeled as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the reported chain. The symmetry choices and bond-dimension limits are stated as methodological choices whose consequences are measured, not presupposed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the variational principle applied to a symmetry-constrained PEPS ansatz whose ability to represent the true QSL is an unproven domain assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • J2/J1 transition ratio
    The value ≈0.08 is located numerically by monitoring the collapse of magnetic order parameters during optimization.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Infinite PEPS with bond dimension D≤7 and enforced Z2 symmetry can faithfully approximate the ground state of the model in the putative QSL regime
    Invoked when interpreting the condensation of spinons and confinement of visons as intrinsic rather than ansatz artifacts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5847 in / 1408 out tokens · 69798 ms · 2026-07-01T04:02:26.770880+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The nature of the quantum spin liquid (QSL) phase in the frustrated $J_1$-$J_2$ Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice remains an open and actively debated problem. In this work, we employ the infinite projected entangled-pair state (PEPS) to systematically investigate the model under different symmetry constraints. Our simulations reveal a direct transition from the $120^\circ$ N\'eel state to a putative QSL at $J_2/J_1\approx 0.08$, signaled by the collapse of magnetic order. We further show that, through either an appropriate unitary rotation or spontaneous spin long-range order, the stripe antiferromagnetic phase can also be accurately captured within the infinite PEPS framework. A central focus of our study is the role played by the PEPS symmetry in approximating the QSL ground-state sandwiched between the two magnetic phases. We first found that a fully-symmetric topological $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Resonating Valence Bond state, which can be written as a simple PEPS with bond dimension $D=3$, exhibits a reasonably good variational energy. Motivated by this finding, we have further constructed generic $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetric PEPS of larger bond dimension (up to $D=7$). We found that, under wavefunction optimization, spinons condense and, simultaneously, topological vison excitations get confined, hence precluding $\mathbb{Z}_2$ topological order. This strongly indicates the gapless (or critical) nature of the QSL phase, which is most naturally consistent with a U(1) Dirac spin liquid scenario.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31021 by Didier Poilblanc, Ji-Yao Chen, Litao Ma, Wei-Lin Tu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Phase diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. PEPS setup on a coarse-grained lattice. (a) Grouping three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Setups for computing spin (a), dimer (b), spinon (c) cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bond energies of the triangular Heisenberg model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Ground-state energy per site [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Finite bond dimension scaling for ground state observables [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. iPEPS investigation of the stripe phase at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Comparison of the ground-state energies - plotted versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fast two-dimensional tensor-network contraction via subspace iteration

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A new CTMRG variant, SI-CTMRG, substitutes QR-based subspace iteration for the dominant large SVD, shifting cost to tensor contractions and enabling state-of-the-art iPEPS calculations on a single H100 GPU.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Further,T 1 0 and T0 1 show the same spectrum, with leading eigenvalues show- ing multi-fold degeneracy in magnitude (see Fig. 10(c)). This behavior is consistent with breakingZ 2 ×Z 2 symmetry of the transfer operator toZ 2 symmetry in the boundary state, where simultaneously acting withZon the bra and ket layer leaves the boundary state invariant. Howev...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review, Re- ports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insula- tor?, Materials Research Bulletin8, 153 (1973)

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insula- tor?, Materials Research Bulletin8, 153 (1973)

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Y . Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Zhu and S

    Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of thes= 1 2 J1 − J2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Hu, S.-S

    W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Competing spin-liquid states in the spin- 1 2 heisenberg model on the trian- gular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 140403 (2015). 11

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Iqbal, W.-J

    Y . Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the heisenbergJ 1 −J 2 triangular antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. B93, 144411 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    S.-S. Gong, W. Zheng, M. Lee, Y .-M. Lu, and D. N. Sheng, Chiral spin liquid with spinon fermi surfaces in the spin- 1 2 tri- angular heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B100, 241111(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y .-C. He, Dirac spin liquid on the spin-1/2triangular heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 207203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Shen, Y .-D

    Y . Shen, Y .-D. Li, H. Wo, Y . Li, S. Shen, B. Pan, Q. Wang, H. C. Walker, P. Steffens, M. Boehm, Y . Hao, D. L. Quintero-Castro, L. W. Harriger, M. D. Frontzek, L. Hao, S. Meng, Q. Zhang, G. Chen, and J. Zhao, Evidence for a spinon fermi surface in a triangular-lattice quantum-spin-liquid candidate, Nature540, 559–562 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    J. A. M. Paddison, M. Daum, Z. Dun, G. Ehlers, Y . Liu, M. B. Stone, H. Zhou, and M. Mourigal, Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO 4, Nature Phys.13, 117 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Y . Li, D. Adroja, D. V oneshen, R. I. Bewley, Q. Zhang, A. A. Tsirlin, and P. Gegenwart, Nearest-neighbour resonating va- lence bonds in YbMgGaO4, Nat. Commun.8, 15814 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    A. O. Scheie, M. Lee, K. Wang, P. Laurell, E. S. Choi, D. Pa- jerowski, Q. Zhang, J. Ma, H. D. Zhou, S. Lee, S. M. Thomas, M. O. Ajeesh, P. F. S. Rosa, A. Chen, V . S. Zapf, M. Heyl, C. D. Batista, E. Dagotto, J. E. Moore, and D. A. Tennant, Spectrum and low-energy gap in triangular quantum spin liquid NaYbSe2, arXiv:2406.17773 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Kaneko, S

    R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and M. Imada, Gapless spin-liquid phase in an extended spin 1/2 triangular heisenberg model, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan83, 093707 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    S. N. Saadatmand and I. P. McCulloch, Detection and charac- terization of symmetry-broken long-range orders in the spin- 1 2 triangular heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B96, 075117 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Jiang and H.-C

    Y .-F. Jiang and H.-C. Jiang, Nature of quantum spin liquids of thes= 1 2 heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice: A parallel dmrg study, Phys. Rev. B107, L140411 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Jiang, S

    S. Jiang, S. R. White, S. A. Kivelson, and H.-C. Jiang, Competing states in theS= 1/2triangular-latticeJ 1-J2 Heisenberg model: a dynamical density-matrix renormaliza- tion group study, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.14892 (2026), arXiv:2602.14892 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Ferrari and F

    F. Ferrari and F. Becca, Dynamical structure factor of the J1 −J 2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: Magnons, spinons, and gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X9, 031026 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral function of theJ 1 −J 2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 165146 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Drescher, L

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in ans= 1 2 heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L220401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Wietek, S

    A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. L ¨auchli, Quantum electro- dynamics in2 + 1dimensions as the organizing principle of a triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X14, 021010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Kovalska, E

    O. Kovalska, E. Pag `es Fontanella, B. Schneider, H.-H. Tu, and J. von Delft, Revisiting theJ 1-J2 Heisenberg Model on a Triangular Lattice: Quasi-Degenerate Ground States and Phase Competition, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.08650 (2026), arXiv:2603.08650 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Renormalization algorithms for Quantum-Many Body Systems in two and higher dimensions

    F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions, arXiv:cond-mat/0407066 (2004)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  24. [24]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P ´erez-Garc´ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Ma- trix product states and projected entangled pair states: Con- cepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Jiang and Y

    S. Jiang and Y . Ran, Symmetric tensor networks and practical simulation algorithms to sharply identify classes of quantum phases distinguishable by short-range physics, Phys. Rev. B92, 104414 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Mambrini, R

    M. Mambrini, R. Or ´us, and D. Poilblanc, Systematic construc- tion of spin liquids on the square lattice from tensor networks with su(2) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B94, 205124 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    J.-Y . Chen, L. Vanderstraeten, S. Capponi, and D. Poilblanc, Non-abelian chiral spin liquid in a quantum antiferromagnet re- vealed by an ipeps study, Phys. Rev. B98, 184409 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    J.-Y . Chen, S. Capponi, A. Wietek, M. Mambrini, N. Schuch, and D. Poilblanc,SU(3) 1 chiral spin liquid on the square lat- tice: A view from symmetric projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 017201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    R. Chi, Y . Liu, Y . Wan, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Spin excita- tion spectra of anisotropic spin-1/2triangular lattice heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 227201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, P. Corboz, and F. Verstraete, Gradient methods for variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B94, 155123 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Hasik, D

    J. Hasik, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Investigation of the N ´eel phase of the frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet by differen- tiable symmetric tensor networks, SciPost Phys.10, 012 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Nishino and K

    T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, Corner Transfer Matrix Renormal- ization Group Method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65, 891 (1996)

    work page 1996

  33. [33]

    Or ´us and G

    R. Or ´us and G. Vidal, Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems on an infinite lattice revisited: Corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction, Phys. Rev. B80, 094403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing states in the t-jmodel: Uniformd-wave state versus stripe state, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 046402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Corboz, Variational optimization with infinite projected entangled-pair states, Phys

    P. Corboz, Variational optimization with infinite projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B94, 035133 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Liao, J.-G

    H.-J. Liao, J.-G. Liu, L. Wang, and T. Xiang, Differentiable pro- gramming tensor networks, Phys. Rev. X9, 031041 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, NY , USA, 2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    Corboz, P

    P. Corboz, P. Czarnik, G. Kapteijns, and L. Tagliacozzo, Finite correlation length scaling with infinite projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. X8, 031031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Rader and A

    M. Rader and A. M. L ¨auchli, Finite correlation length scaling in lorentz-invariant gapless ipeps wave functions, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031030 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Huang, X

    J. Huang, X. Qian, and M. Qin, On the magnetization of the 120° order of the spin-1/2 triangular lattice heisenberg model: a dmrg revisited, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 185602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Naumann, J

    J. Naumann, J. Eisert, and P. Schmoll, Variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B113, 045117 (2026)

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    Heidarian, S

    D. Heidarian, S. Sorella, and F. Becca, Spin- 1 2 heisenberg model on the anisotropic triangular lattice: From magnetism to a one-dimensional spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B80, 012404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Poilblanc and M

    D. Poilblanc and M. Mambrini, Quantum critical phase with infinite projected entangled paired states, Phys. Rev. B96, 014414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    S. Niu, J. Hasik, J.-Y . Chen, and D. Poilblanc, Chiral spin liq- uids on the kagome lattice with projected entangled simplex states, Phys. Rev. B106, 245119 (2022). 12

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    H.-Y . Lee, R. Kaneko, T. Okubo, and N. Kawashima, Gapless kitaev spin liquid to classical string gas through tensor net- works, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 087203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Schuch, D

    N. Schuch, D. Poilblanc, J. I. Cirac, and D. P ´erez-Garc´ıa, Res- onating valence bond states in the peps formalism, Phys. Rev. B86, 115108 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Poilblanc, N

    D. Poilblanc, N. Schuch, D. P´erez-Garc´ıa, and J. I. Cirac, Topo- logical and entanglement properties of resonating valence bond wave functions, Phys. Rev. B86, 014404 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Chen and D

    J.-Y . Chen and D. Poilblanc, Topological Z 2 resonating- valence-bond spin liquid on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B97, 161107 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Duivenvoorden, M

    K. Duivenvoorden, M. Iqbal, J. Haegeman, F. Verstraete, and N. Schuch, Entanglement phases as holographic duals of anyon condensates, Phys. Rev. B95, 235119 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Iqbal, K

    M. Iqbal, K. Duivenvoorden, and N. Schuch, Study of anyon condensation and topological phase transitions from aZ 4 topo- logical phase using the projected entangled pair states approach, Phys. Rev. B97, 195124 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Iqbal and N

    M. Iqbal and N. Schuch, Entanglement order parameters and critical behavior for topological phase transitions and beyond, Phys. Rev. X11, 041014 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Schuch, D

    N. Schuch, D. Poilblanc, J. I. Cirac, and D. P´erez-Garc´ıa, Topo- logical order in the projected entangled-pair states formalism: Transfer operator and boundary hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland, Condensate-induced transi- tions between topologically ordered phases, Phys. Rev. B79, 045316 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    S. Sachdev, Kagome´- and triangular-lattice heisenberg antifer- romagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum- disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons, Phys. Rev. B45, 12377 (1992)

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    Rispler, K

    M. Rispler, K. Duivenvoorden, and N. Schuch, Long-range or- der and symmetry breaking in projected entangled-pair state models, Phys. Rev. B92, 155133 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Budaraju, A

    S. Budaraju, A. Parola, Y . Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Monopole excitations in theu(1)dirac spin liquid on the trian- gular lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 125150 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Dynamical dimer structure factor of the triangular $S=1/2$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Dynamical dimer structure factor of the trian- gularS= 1/2Heisenberg antiferromagnet, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2604.24868 (2026), arXiv:2604.24868 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026