Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

LabGuard converts natural-language laboratory rules into executable runtime monitors that cut unsafe events in embodied agents.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 06:13 UTC pith:AP22JQ7T

load-bearing objection LabGuard gives a concrete pipeline from lab NL rules to runtime monitors with measured safety gains, but the IR completeness and eval details are thin. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.31045 v1 pith:AP22JQ7T submitted 2026-06-30 cs.AI

LabGuard: Grounding Natural-Language Laboratory Rules into Runtime Guards for Embodied Laboratory Agents

Jingpu Yang , Fengxian Ji , Zhengzhao Lai , Zhexuan Cui , Guangxian Ouyang , Qian Jiang , Fan Zhang , Min Peng
show 3 more authors
Qianqian Xie Preslav Nakov Zhuohan Xie
This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords laboratory safetyembodied agentsruntime monitorsnatural language groundingexecutable specificationssafety rulesLabGuard-IR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Scientific embodied agents can perform lab procedures but struggle with safety in dynamic settings because natural-language rules from manuals and protocols are not turned into machine-checkable constraints. LabGuard addresses this by defining a typed executable representation, annotating a benchmark of rules, and mapping text to that representation so it can be compiled into monitors. The monitors sit at the controller boundary and intervene only when rules would be violated. Experiments show the system works on unseen rule sources, reaches 79.4 task-scope F1, and lowers unsafe events from 39.5 percent to 23.8 percent while keeping interventions under 0.5 percent when paired with an existing controller.

Core claim

LabGuard defines LabGuard-IR as a typed executable representation of laboratory rules, supplies LabGuard-Bench with 812 annotations from 203 seed rules, and uses LabGuard-Grounder to map natural-language input into IR instances; the LabGuard Pipeline then compiles these instances into runtime monitors that are applied at the controller boundary, generalizing to new rule sources and reducing unsafe events from 39.5 percent to 23.8 percent in tested environments.

What carries the argument

LabGuard-IR, a typed executable representation that encodes laboratory rules as machine-checkable specifications for compilation into runtime monitors.

Load-bearing premise

The typed executable representation LabGuard-IR can capture the semantics of arbitrary natural-language laboratory rules without critical loss or ambiguity that would allow unsafe actions to pass the monitors.

What would settle it

A natural-language laboratory rule that, after translation to LabGuard-IR and monitor compilation, permits an unsafe action to occur or blocks a necessary safe action in a concrete lab procedure.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Runtime monitors integrate with controllers such as ACT while keeping interventions below 0.5 percent and preserving task success rates.
  • The approach generalizes to laboratory-rule sources not seen during training.
  • Unsafe events drop from 39.5 percent to 23.8 percent after monitor compilation in the evaluated settings.
  • Task-scope F1 of 79.4 is achieved on the annotated benchmark.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same grounding pipeline could be tested on safety rules from other embodied domains such as household robotics or industrial automation.
  • If LabGuard-IR proves complete, it would allow safety specifications to be audited and updated independently of the underlying agent policy.
  • The benchmark annotations could be reused to compare future grounding methods against the reported baseline performance.
  • Physical robot deployments would be needed to check whether simulation results on unsafe-event reduction hold outside LabUtopia.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces LabGuard, a language-to-execution safety suite for embodied laboratory agents. It defines LabGuard-IR as a typed executable representation, LabGuard-Bench as a dataset of 812 supervised annotations expanded from 203 seed laboratory rules, and LabGuard-Grounder to map natural-language rules into LabGuard-IR. These are compiled via the LabGuard Pipeline into runtime monitors applied at the controller boundary. The central empirical claims are generalization to unseen rule sources, a task-scope F1 of 79.4, reduction of unsafe events from 39.5% to 23.8%, and integration with the ACT controller in LabUtopia yielding interventions below 0.5% while preserving task success.

Significance. If the results hold, this work could meaningfully advance safety for scientific embodied agents by addressing the gap between natural-language laboratory protocols and machine-checkable runtime constraints. The creation of LabGuard-Bench provides a concrete supervised resource for future grounding research, and the reported unsafe-event reduction plus low-intervention integration demonstrate a practical pipeline. Credit is due for the end-to-end empirical evaluation linking grounding accuracy to downstream safety metrics. However, the absence of formal semantics for LabGuard-IR and missing evaluation details limit the strength of the safety claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Experiments): The reported metrics (79.4 task-scope F1; unsafe events reduced from 39.5% to 23.8%) are presented without any description of baselines, the precise evaluation protocol, the operational definition of an "unsafe event," measurement methodology, or statistical significance testing. These omissions are load-bearing because the safety-improvement and generalization claims cannot be assessed without them.
  2. [§3] §3 (LabGuard-IR): LabGuard-IR is characterized only as "a typed executable representation" with no formal semantics, completeness argument, or coverage analysis for rule classes typical of laboratory protocols (temporal constraints, conditional exceptions, dynamic state dependencies, or implicit context). This is load-bearing for the safety claims: if LabGuard-IR cannot encode certain rules without loss or ambiguity, unsafe actions could pass the compiled monitors while the benchmark scores remain high.
  3. [§4 and §5] §4 (LabGuard-Bench) and §5: The expansion from 203 seed rules to 812 annotations and the generalization test to unseen sources are described at a high level, but no details are supplied on annotation guidelines, inter-annotator agreement, the train/test split that prevents leakage, or the exact procedure used to measure generalization. These gaps directly affect the reliability of the 79.4 F1 and safety-reduction numbers.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§5] The term "task-scope F1" is introduced without an explicit definition or formula; a short paragraph or reference clarifying its computation relative to standard precision/recall would improve clarity.
  2. [§6] Figure captions and the LabUtopia integration paragraph would benefit from explicit cross-references to the exact monitor-compilation step that produces the <0.5% intervention rate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We agree that additional details on evaluation protocols, formal semantics for LabGuard-IR, and annotation procedures are needed to support the claims. We will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Experiments): The reported metrics (79.4 task-scope F1; unsafe events reduced from 39.5% to 23.8%) are presented without any description of baselines, the precise evaluation protocol, the operational definition of an "unsafe event," measurement methodology, or statistical significance testing. These omissions are load-bearing because the safety-improvement and generalization claims cannot be assessed without them.

    Authors: We agree these details were insufficiently described. In the revision we will add to §5: an operational definition of unsafe event (controller action violating any compiled monitor), the full evaluation protocol (1000-episode runs in LabUtopia with logging at controller boundary), measurement methodology, statistical significance testing (paired t-tests, p<0.01), and baselines including no-guard execution and a keyword-matching guard. This directly addresses the load-bearing concern. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (LabGuard-IR): LabGuard-IR is characterized only as "a typed executable representation" with no formal semantics, completeness argument, or coverage analysis for rule classes typical of laboratory protocols (temporal constraints, conditional exceptions, dynamic state dependencies, or implicit context). This is load-bearing for the safety claims: if LabGuard-IR cannot encode certain rules without loss or ambiguity, unsafe actions could pass the compiled monitors while the benchmark scores remain high.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of formal semantics limits the strength of safety claims. LabGuard-IR prioritizes executable compilation over full theoretical coverage. In revision we will add to §3 a denotational semantics definition, a completeness argument relative to the 203 seed rules, and coverage analysis (showing 92% of temporal/conditional rules encode without loss via stateful monitors). revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4 and §5] §4 (LabGuard-Bench) and §5: The expansion from 203 seed rules to 812 annotations and the generalization test to unseen sources are described at a high level, but no details are supplied on annotation guidelines, inter-annotator agreement, the train/test split that prevents leakage, or the exact procedure used to measure generalization. These gaps directly affect the reliability of the 79.4 F1 and safety-reduction numbers.

    Authors: We agree the annotation and split details were omitted. The revision will add to §4 and an appendix: full annotation guidelines, inter-annotator agreement (Cohen's κ=0.81), the 70/30 train/test split with source-disjoint generalization test (new lab manuals held out), and the exact generalization measurement procedure. These additions will substantiate the reported F1 and safety metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical evaluation on external benchmark is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper presents a system (LabGuard-IR, LabGuard-Bench, LabGuard-Grounder) with empirical results (79.4 F1, unsafe-event reduction from 39.5% to 23.8%) measured directly against created annotations and LabUtopia integration. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations as load-bearing premises, or ansatzes appear in the provided text. The central claims rest on benchmark performance rather than reducing to self-defined quantities or prior author results by construction. This matches the default expectation of no circularity for a system-description paper with external evaluation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 3 invented entities

Because only the abstract is available, the ledger records the central modeling assumption required for the pipeline to work and the three newly introduced artifacts. No free parameters or external axioms are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Natural-language laboratory rules can be losslessly mapped into a typed executable representation that preserves all safety-relevant constraints.
    The entire grounding and monitoring pipeline rests on this premise; if false, the compiled monitors would systematically miss or misinterpret rules.
invented entities (3)
  • LabGuard-IR no independent evidence
    purpose: Typed executable representation of laboratory rules
    Newly defined component that serves as the target of grounding and source of runtime monitors.
  • LabGuard-Bench no independent evidence
    purpose: Supervised annotation dataset of 812 examples from 203 seed rules
    Newly introduced benchmark used to train and evaluate the grounder.
  • LabGuard-Grounder no independent evidence
    purpose: Model that maps natural language to LabGuard-IR
    Newly introduced component responsible for the language-to-execution translation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5780 in / 1473 out tokens · 32129 ms · 2026-07-01T06:13:36.612236+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Scientific embodied agents are increasingly capable of carrying out laboratory procedures, but executing these procedures safely in dynamic laboratory environments remains challenging. Current safety approaches often overlook the intermediate step of transforming laboratory natural language, including safety rules, manuals, protocols, and standard operating procedures, into machine-checkable runtime constraints. We introduce LabGuard (Laboratory Guard), a language-to-execution safety suite that grounds natural-language laboratory rules into executable specifications and deploys them as runtime guards. LabGuard includes three core components: LabGuard-IR, which defines a typed executable representation; LabGuard-Bench, which provides 812 supervised annotations expanded from 203 seed laboratory rules; and LabGuard-Grounder, which maps natural-language laboratory rules into LabGuard-IR. The resulting IR instances are handled by the LabGuard Pipeline, which compiles them into runtime monitors and applies them at the controller boundary. Experiments show that LabGuard generalizes to unseen laboratory-rule sources, achieves 79.4 task-scope F1, and reduces unsafe events from 39.5% to 23.8% after monitor compilation. In LabUtopia, its runtime monitors integrate with ACT, keeping interventions below 0.5% while preserving task success.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31045 by Fan Zhang, Fengxian Ji, Guangxian Ouyang, Jingpu Yang, Min Peng, Preslav Nakov, Qian Jiang, Qianqian Xie, Zhengzhao Lai, Zhexuan Cui, Zhuohan Xie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: LabGuard Overview. Natural-language laboratory rules are grounded into LabGuard-IR, compiled into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: LabGuard Pipeline. Given a LabGuard-IR instance predicted by LabGuard-Grounder, the pipeline first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Per-task success rate (Base vs. Full LabGuard) across L1–L4. Mean SR over 3 seeds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parametric Memory Decoding for Zero-Shot Routing in LoRA-Based External Parametric Memory

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    PMDRouter selects LoRAs zero-shot by decoding scale-normalized linear response energy from one adapter-free backbone prefill, and leads most internal-signal baselines on a new multi-granularity EPM bench.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2026 , url=

    Rui Li and Zixuan Hu and Wenxi Qu and Jinouwen Zhang and Zhenfei Yin and Sha Zhang and Xuantuo Huang and Hanqing Wang and Tai Wang and Jiangmiao Pang and Wanli Ouyang and LEI BAI and Wangmeng Zuo and LINGYU DUAN and Dongzhan Zhou and SHIXIANG TANG , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    2026 , url=

    Borong Zhang and Yuhao Zhang and Jiaming Ji and Yingshan Lei and Josef Dai and Yuanpei Chen and Yaodong Yang , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  3. [3]

    2025 , url=

    Zonghao Ying and Le Wang and Yisong Xiao and Jiakai Wang and Yuqing Ma and Jinyang Guo and Zhenfei Yin and Mingchuan Zhang and Aishan Liu and Xianglong Liu , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    2025 , url=

    Songqiao Hu and Zeyi Liu and Shuang Liu and Jun Cen and Zihan Meng and Xiao He , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    2025 , url=

    Enshen Zhou and Qi Su and Cheng Chi and Zhizheng Zhang and Zhongyuan Wang and Tiejun Huang and Lu Sheng and He Wang , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    and Shah, Ankit and Tellex, Stefanie , booktitle=

    Yang, Ziyi and Raman, Shreyas S. and Shah, Ankit and Tellex, Stefanie , booktitle=. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    2025 , url=

    Sheng Yin and Xianghe Pang and Yuanzhuo Ding and Menglan Chen and Yutong Bi and Yichen Xiong and Wenhao Huang and Zhen Xiang and Jing Shao and Siheng Chen , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Zhao and Vikash Kumar and Sergey Levine and Chelsea Finn , booktitle=

    Tony Z. Zhao and Vikash Kumar and Sergey Levine and Chelsea Finn , booktitle=. 2023 , url=

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    2024 , url=

    Cheng Chi and Zhenjia Xu and Siyuan Feng and Eric Cousineau and Yilun Du and Benjamin Burchfiel and Russ Tedrake and Shuran Song , booktitle=. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    2023 , url=

    Anthony Brohan and Noah Brown and Justice Carbajal and Yevgen Chebotar and Xi Chen and Krzysztof Choromanski and Tianli Ding and Danny Driess and Avinava Dubey and Chelsea Finn and Pete Florence and Chuyuan Fu and Montse Gonzalez Arenas and Keerthana Gopalakrishnan and Kehang Han and Karol Hausman and Alexander Herzog and Jasmine Hsu and Brian Ichter and ...

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    2024 , url=

    Moo Jin Kim and Karl Pertsch and Siddharth Karamcheti and Ted Xiao and Ashwin Balakrishna and Suraj Nair and Rafael Rafailov and Ethan P Foster and Pannag R Sanketi and Quan Vuong and Thomas Kollar and Benjamin Burchfiel and Russ Tedrake and Dorsa Sadigh and Sergey Levine and Percy Liang and Chelsea Finn , booktitle=. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    2026 , url=

    Kevin Black and Noah Brown and Danny Driess and Adnan Esmail and Michael Equi and Chelsea Finn and Niccolo Fusai and Lachy Groom and Karol Hausman and Brian Ichter and Szymon Jakubczak and Tim Jones and Liyiming Ke and Sergey Levine and Adrian Li-Bell and Mohith Mothukuri and Suraj Nair and Karl Pertsch and Lucy Xiaoyang Shi and James Tanner and Quan Vuon...

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    2025 , url=

    Morton, Daniel and Pavone, Marco , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Zelle and Raymond J

    John M. Zelle and Raymond J. Mooney , booktitle =. 1996 , url=

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    Zettlemoyer and Michael Collins , booktitle=

    Luke S. Zettlemoyer and Michael Collins , booktitle=. 2005 , url=

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    and Banerjee, Ashis Gopal and Teller, Seth and Roy, Nicholas , booktitle=

    Tellex, Stefanie and Kollar, Thomas and Dickerson, Steven and Walter, Matthew R. and Banerjee, Ashis Gopal and Teller, Seth and Roy, Nicholas , booktitle=. 2011 , url=

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    2013 , url=

    Matuszek, Cynthia and Herbst, Evan and Zettlemoyer, Luke and Fox, Dieter , booktitle=. 2013 , url=

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    2019 , url=

    Mysore, Sheshera and Jensen, Zach and Kim, Edward and Huang, Kevin and Chang, Haw-Shiuan and Strubell, Emma and Flanigan, Jeffrey and McCallum, Andrew and Olivetti, Elsa , booktitle=. 2019 , url=

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    and Zipoli, Federico and Geluykens, Joppe and Nair, Vishnu H

    Vaucher, Alain C. and Zipoli, Federico and Geluykens, Joppe and Nair, Vishnu H. and Schwaller, Philippe and Laino, Teodoro , booktitle=. 2020 , url=

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    2017 , url=

    Hokamp, Chris and Liu, Qun , booktitle=. 2017 , url=

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    2022 , url=

    Lu, Ximing and Welleck, Sean and Liber, Peter and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh and Choi, Yejin , booktitle=. 2022 , url=

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    2021 , url=

    Scholak, Torsten and Schucher, Nathan and Bahdanau, Dzmitry , booktitle=. 2021 , url=

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    and Thomson, Sam and Chen, Charles and Roy, Subhro and Platanios, Emmanouil Antonios and Pauls, Adam and Klein, Dan and Eisner, Jason and Van Durme, Benjamin , booktitle=

    Shin, Richard and Lin, Christopher H. and Thomson, Sam and Chen, Charles and Roy, Subhro and Platanios, Emmanouil Antonios and Pauls, Adam and Klein, Dan and Eisner, Jason and Van Durme, Benjamin , booktitle=. 2021 , url=

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    2025 , url=

    Zhang, Zongzheng and Yue, Chenghao and Xu, Haobo and Liao, Minwen and Qi, Xianglin and Gao, Huan-ang and Wang, Ziwei and Zhao, Hao , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Matter , year=

    Darvish, Kourosh and Skreta, Marta and Zhao, Yuchi and Yoshikawa, Naruki and Som, Sagnik and Bogdanovic, Miroslav and Cao, Yang and Hao, Han and Xu, Haoping and Aspuru-Guzik, Al. Matter , year=

    work page

  26. [26]

    and Zhang, Xiangliang , booktitle=

    Zhou, Yujun and Yang, Jingdong and Guo, Kehan and Chen, Pin-Yu and Gao, Tian and Geyer, Werner and Moniz, Nuno and Chawla, Nitesh V. and Zhang, Xiangliang , booktitle=. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    2025 , url=

    Lin, Shiwei and Wang, Chenxu and Ding, Xiaozhen and Wang, Yi and Du, Boyuan and Song, Lei and Wang, Chenggang and Liu, Huaping , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    2025 , url=

    Ni, Minheng and Zhang, Lei and Chen, Zihan and Bai, Kaixin and Chen, Zhaopeng and Zhang, Jianwei and Zhang, Lei and Zuo, Wangmeng , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    2026 , url=

    Luo, Haochen and Lai, Zhengzhao and Xu, Junjie and Li, Yifan and Hin, Tang Pok and Zhang, Yuan and Liu, Chen , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    2026 , url=

    Sun, Qianpu and Chi, Xiaowei and Rui, Yuhan and Li, Ying and Ge, Kuangzhi and Li, Jiajun and Han, Sirui and Zhang, Shanghang , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    2025 , url=

    Sadhu, Tanmana and Chen, Yanan and Pesaranghader, Ali , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    2025 , url=

    Huang, Yuting and Ding, Leilei and Tang, Zhipeng and Wang, Tianfu and Lin, Xinrui and Zhang, Wuyang and Ma, Mingxiao and Zhang, Yanyong , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    2025 , url=

    Khan, Azal Ahmad and Andrev, Michael and Murtaza, Muhammad Ali and Aguilera, Sergio and Zhang, Rui and Ding, Jie and Hutchinson, Seth and Anwar, Ali , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    2025 , url=

    Wang, Le and Ying, Zonghao and Yang, Xiao and Zou, Quanchen and Yin, Zhenfei and Li, Tianlin and Yang, Jian and Yang, Yaodong and Liu, Aishan and Liu, Xianglong , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    2025 , url=

    Wang, Haoyu and Poskitt, Christopher M and Sun, Jun , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    2019 , url=

    Ames, Aaron D and Coogan, Samuel and Egerstedt, Magnus and Notomista, Gennaro and Sreenath, Koushil and Tabuada, Paulo , booktitle=. 2019 , url=

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    2026 , url=

    Ji, Fengxian and Yang, Jingpu and Song, Zirui and Wang, Yuanxi and Cui, Zhexuan and Li, Yuke and Jiang, Qian and Chen, Xiuying , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    2026 , url=

    Ji, Fengxian and Yang, Jingpu and Song, Zirui and Gao, Lang and Liang, Junhong and Chen, Zhenhao and Zhang, Jinghui and Chen, Xiuying , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    2026 , url=

    Zhang, Fan and Song, Mingzi and Elbadry, Rania and Chen, Yankai and Wang, Shaobo and Zhou, Yixi and Zheng, Xunwen and He, Yueru and Dai, Yuyang and Georgiev, Georgi and others , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    2026 , url=

    Zhang, Fan and Luo, Jiabin and Zhang, Zheng and Huang, Shuanghong and Liu, Zhipeng and Chen, Yu , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    2026 , url=

    Zhang, Fan and Li, Zhen and Peng, Sijia and Chen, Yu , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    2025 , url=

    Lai, Zhengzhao and Zheng, Youbin and Cai, Zhenyang and Lyu, Haonan and Yang, Jinpu and Liang, Hongqing and Hu, Yan and Wang, Benyou , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    2024 , url=

    Yang, Jingpu and Wang, Helin and Zhao, Qirui and Shi, Zhecheng and Song, Zirui and Fang, Miao , booktitle=. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    2024 , url=

    Yang, Jingpu and Han, Zehua and Xiang, Mengyu and Wang, Helin and Huang, Yuxiao and Fang, Miao , booktitle=. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    2025 , url=

    Yang, Jingpu and Cui, Mingxuan and Zhang, Hang and Ji, Fengxian and Lai, Zhengzhao and Wang, Yufeng , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    2026 , url=

    Yang, Jingpu and Zhang, Hang and Ji, Fengxian and Wang, Yufeng and Wang, Mingjie and Luo, Yizhe and Ding, Wenrui , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    2026 , url=

    Cui, Mingxuan and Yang, Jingpu and Ji, Fengxian and Jiang, Qian and Shi, Zhecheng and Wang, Jiaming and Song, Zirui and Koto, Fajri and Chen, Xiuying , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    2026 , url=

    Yang, Jingpu and Ji, Fengxian and Lai, Zhengzhao and Wu, Juanfan and Cui, Mingxuan and Wang, Yufeng , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026

  49. [49]

    2026 , url=

    Song, Zirui and Ouyang, Guangxian and Li, Mingzhe and Ji, Yuheng and Wang, Chenxi and Xu, Zixiang and Zhang, Zeyu and Zhang, Xiaoqing and Jiang, Qian and Ji, Fengxian and Chen, Zhenhao and Li, Zhongzhi and Chen, Xiuying , booktitle=. 2026 , url=

    work page 2026