Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

HarmoHOI is a unified diffusion framework that jointly generates synchronized multi-view hand-object interaction videos and globally aligned metric-scale 3D point tracks from a single reference image and target camera poses.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 19:01 UTC pith:5F5575OE

load-bearing objection Genuinely new multi-view HOI video+motion co-generation with a load-bearing scale-source gap at inference. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17097 v1 pith:5F5575OE submitted 2026-07-19 cs.CV

HarmoHOI: Harmonizing Appearance and 3D Motion for Multi-view Hand-Object Interaction Synthesis

Lingwei Dang , Juntong Li , Zonghan Li , Hongwen Zhang , Liang An , Wei Min , Yebin Liu , Qingyao Wu This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords multi-view video generationhand-object interaction synthesis3D point tracksdiffusion transformergeometry-aware generationpseudo-video representationglobal motion alignmenthybrid curriculum learning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper's central claim is that consistent multi-view video of hand-object interaction is best produced by generating appearance and 3D motion together, not by synchronizing 2D views or reconstructing 3D afterward. To establish this, the authors build HarmoHOI, a diffusion framework that denoises RGB videos and 3D point tracks in one pass, representing tracks as color-coded pseudo-videos so a pretrained video model can process them. A second diffusion module, GloMAD, turns up-to-scale coarse tracks into metric-scale, globally aligned trajectories, and the two modules exchange signals during denoising. A staged curriculum trains first on single-view video, then on synchronized multi-view data, to preserve generic visual priors while injecting geometric consistency. If the central claim holds, animators and embodied agents would get synchronized viewpoints plus usable 3D motion from one image, with geometric consistency built in rather than patched on.

Core claim

On its own terms, HarmoHOI claims that representing 3D point tracks as 'motion pseudo-videos' erases the domain gap between geometry and the latent space of video foundation models, so the same diffusion transformer can co-model 2D appearance and 3D motion. Co-denoising the two branches lets each constrain the other; inter-view geometric attention enforces epipolar consistency at every denoising step. GloMAD then refines the coarse tracks into metric-scale, globally aligned 3D trajectories, closing a loop by projecting refined tracks back into pseudo-video form to guide the next denoising step. With only a reference image, target cameras, and a text prompt, the framework outputs V synchroniz

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are two. First, the motion pseudo-video: 3D point tracks are depth-normalized, reverse-scaled, color-mapped into RGB-like frames, and VAE-encoded exactly like video frames, so the geometric signal shares a latent space with appearance. Second, the Global Motion Aligning Diffusion (GloMAD): a sparse-convolution point-cloud network with inter-view geometric attention that takes the coarse up-to-scale tracks from M2DiT and outputs globally aligned metric-scale trajectories. The two are wired into a closed loop: during denoising, GloMAD's refined tracks are projected back into pseudo-video and injected into M2DiT's next step, while M2DiT's estimated global scale token ma

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that metric-scale depth of the reference image is available at inference, but the paper does not state how this depth is obtained; if only relative depth is available, the 'metric-scale' and 'globally aligned' parts of the claim lose their meaning.

What would settle it

Take a reference image with known ground-truth metric depth, run the pipeline, and compare the output 3D point tracks against motion-capture ground truth; if the tracks are off by a non-constant scale or more than a small rigid misalignment, the central claim fails. A simpler probe: scale the input depth by 0.5 and check whether the output tracks scale correspondingly—if the model ignores or hallucinates the scale, metric alignment is not actually happening.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A user supplies one reference image, target camera poses, and a text prompt; the model returns V synchronized videos and K metric-scale 3D point tracks in one pass.
  • Multi-view geometric consistency is enforced during generation, not through post-hoc reconstruction or ICP alignment.
  • Because point tracks are encoded as pseudo-videos, a pretrained video diffusion backbone can be adapted to generate 3D motion without training a separate 3D generator from scratch.
  • The three-stage curriculum (single-view warm-up, multi-view appearance, then multi-view geometry) allows scarce multi-view HOI data to be supplemented by abundant single-view video.
  • If the scale assumption is met, the 3D tracks have metric meaning, so they can be used directly for animation, simulation, or embodied-agent training.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension left implicit: the pseudo-video representation is a general recipe; any dynamic 3D signal (object trajectories, human skeleton motion, scene flow) could be color-mapped and injected into a video DiT the same way, potentially turning other video generators into geometry-aware ones.
  • The method's practical reach depends on resolving where metric reference depth comes from; a monocular depth network plus a scale calibration step could make the pipeline true RGB-only, a natural next step.
  • The closed-loop design suggests a broader principle: rather than treating geometry as a conditioning side channel, feed a generator's own geometric output back as input at each denoising step—an idea that could transfer to other multi-view or 4D generation tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes HarmoHOI, a unified diffusion framework for multi-view hand-object interaction (HOI) synthesis. From a single reference image, multi-view target camera poses, and a text prompt, the method jointly generates synchronized multi-view RGB videos and 3D point tracks claimed to be metric-scale and globally aligned. The architecture couples a Mixture of Multi-view Diffusion Transformer (M2DiT), which co-models RGB videos and motion pseudo-videos derived from point tracks, with a Global Motion Aligning Diffusion (GloMAD) module that refines coarse point tracks. A hybrid-data progressive curriculum uses single-view in-the-wild data, synthetic multi-view data, and lab-captured TACO data. Experiments report improved video quality, motion plausibility, and geometric consistency over several baselines on held-out TACO data, with ablations for each component.

Significance. If the claims hold, HarmoHOI is a substantial contribution: it is the first framework to jointly generate multi-view HOI videos and 3D point tracks in a single diffusion process, reuses video foundation model priors through pseudo-video representation, and explicitly targets metric-scale global alignment. The curriculum strategy is also a plausible way to mitigate the scarcity of paired multi-view video and 3D motion data. However, the central 'metric-scale globally aligned' claim depends on an inference-time depth/scale input that the paper never specifies, and the quantitative evidence is based solely on point estimates without error bars or significance tests. The conceptual framework is promising, but the manuscript currently overstates what is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Algorithm 1, Algorithm 2] The metric-scale claim is not supported by the stated inference inputs. Algorithm 1 consumes a reference depth d_ref and depth scale s to build motion pseudo-videos (lines 5-7), and Algorithm 2 lists only an 'averager depth scale s-bar' and the reference image. The task definition in Sec. 3 says input is a single reference image, camera poses, and text. A single RGB image is metrically ambiguous; the learnable scale tokens can at best regress a plausible scale from object priors, not recover true metric scale. The paper must state where d_ref and s come from at inference, and validate metric-scale alignment using that source (e.g., comparing outputs obtained with DA3-estimated depth vs. TACO ground-truth depth). If the method only produces up-to-scale geometry, the 'metric-scale' wording and the matching claims in the abstract and Sec. 4 must be revised.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Tables 1-3] All quantitative comparisons are single point estimates with no error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests. This is load-bearing for the 'state-of-the-art' claim, especially where margins are small (Table 1: CLIP-V 83.18 vs 83.01; Table 2: RPE 14.8 vs 16.7, non-contact rate 0.12 vs 0.15). Please report standard deviations over multiple evaluation seeds or test splits, state the number of test clips, and provide paired significance tests where appropriate. Table 3 also omits RPE for the row without GloMAD, making that ablation incomplete.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Baselines] The baseline comparison protocol is underspecified. The text says baselines were fine-tuned on 'our data' but does not state whether the same TACO train/test split, reference images, and camera poses were used, nor the fine-tuning hyperparameters. SV4D 2.0 receives a source video and multi-view reference images, so its input is strictly richer; the paper should explain how this is accounted for. Without this detail, the reported gains over prior methods are hard to interpret.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Algorithm 2] 'averager depth scale s-bar' should be 'average depth scale s-bar'. Also, s-bar is never defined; please define it and explain how it is computed at inference.
  2. [Sec. 4.1 / Table 2] Table 2 has the typo 'Plaussibility' for 'Plausibility'. In addition, the column header 'Mat. Pix.' in Table 1 should match the metric name 'Matching Pixels' used in Sec. 4.1.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 / Table 2] Depth Anything 3 is used to produce pseudo-depth labels for HOIGen1M in Stage 1 and is also listed as a 3D motion baseline in Table 2. This creates a possible circularity; the paper should acknowledge this and discuss whether the comparison is affected.
  4. [Sec. 3.3] The name 'Mixture of Multi-view Diffusion Transformer' suggests a mixture-of-experts design, but the described architecture is a dual-branch transformer with inter-view attention. Please clarify the naming to avoid confusion.
  5. [Fig. 2] The figure uses abbreviations such as 'Bach Size', 'B', 't', 'V', 'hw', 'd' without a full legend. Please spell out 'Batch Size' and define all tensor-dimension symbols in the caption or text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction in the derivation chain; metric-scale alignment is a supervised, held-out benchmarked output. Minor independence burdens come from same-group prior work (SViMo, TACO) and from Depth Anything 3 doubling as pseudo-label generator and baseline, but none of these make the central claim equivalent to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The central claims are supported by supervised training objectives and external held-out evaluation, not by definitional equivalence. M2DiT is trained with Eq. (4), which jointly supervises the RGB velocity, the motion pseudo-video velocity, and the global metric scale s: ||ŝ - s||^2. The metric scale is therefore a learned regression target, not a quantity defined by the outputs. GloMAD refines coarse point tracks with a loss containing MSE and Chamfer distance against ground-truth M (Eq. 5), and the final 3D results are evaluated on a held-out TACO split using Chamfer distance, RPE, and inlier percentage. Thus the 'metric-scale, globally aligned 3D point tracks' are supervised predictions benchmarked against ground truth, not the same quantity as any fitted input. The skeptical concern about an unstated inference-time metric depth source is a correctness/assumption gap, not a circularity. Algorithm 1 consumes d_ref and s during training to build multi-view conditions; Algorithm 2 at inference uses the reference latent and predicted scale ŝ. The manuscript does not state where a metric d_ref would come from at inference, so the metric-scale property may degrade for arbitrary single RGB images. But this does not reduce the derivation to its own inputs: the paper never defines d_ref or s as the output, and the scale is not fitted to the final tracks. Self-citation is present but not load-bearing. SViMo (Dang et al. 2025) is a same-group prior method used as a related-work contrast and as a Table 1 baseline; TACO (Liu et al. 2024b) is co-authored by one of the present authors and used as the benchmark dataset. These are independence concerns, but the paper's central results are not justified by citing these works as theorems or as forced choices. The benchmark numbers come from held-out TACO ground truth with external metrics and additional external baselines. Similarly, Depth Anything 3 is used both to generate pseudo-labels in stage 1 and as a baseline in Table 2; this is a possible fairness/contamination issue, but the final TACO 3D evaluation uses ground-truth motion, so the headline quantitative result is not forced by that overlap. The explicit Limitation section concerns viewpoint density and future 4D Gaussian rendering, not a circular dependence. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, no ansatz is smuggled in via a self-citation, and the pseudo-video representation is an architectural choice rather than a renaming of a kn

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on several learned or assumed quantities: global scale tokens and average depth scale (free parameters), transferability of video-foundation priors to pseudo-videos, trust in DA3 pseudo-depth for stage 1, availability of metric reference depth at inference, and synthetic-to-real multi-view transfer. None of these are externally validated beyond the paper's own experiments.

free parameters (2)
  • Global metric-scale tokens (two learnable tokens f_s)
    Sec. 3.3 and Supp. C: two learnable scale tokens are prepended to regress the global metric scale ŝ from scale-normalized pseudo-videos; the scale-prediction head is trained with ||ŝ - s||^2 loss. The metric-scale claim depends on this learned quantity.
  • Average depth scale s̄
    Alg. 2: at t=T the global scale is initialized to an "averager depth scale" from training data; if this training-distribution average is wrong for a test scene, the entire trajectory scale is wrong.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Depth-normalized, colormapped point tracks ('motion pseudo-videos') can be encoded by the same video VAE as RGB with sufficiently small information loss for 2D-to-3D co-generation.
    Sec. 3.3: the whole M2DiT design depends on reusing the pretrained video VAE and DiT for 3D motion; if VAE encoding destroys metric/depth information, GloMAD cannot recover globally aligned trajectories.
  • domain assumption The pretrained WAN 2.1 text-to-video DiT priors transfer to the motion pseudo-video branch and to multi-view joint generation without collapse.
    Sec. 3.3: 'reuse the representational and generative priors of pretrained video models'; no formal guarantee, only empirical warm-up.
  • domain assumption Pseudo-geometric annotations from Depth Anything 3 on in-the-wild HOIGen1M are reliable enough to teach appearance-motion correspondence.
    Sec. 3.5 and Sec. 4.1: stage 1 uses DA3-estimated depth and camera poses as supervision; if these are noisy or scale-inconsistent, stage-1 priors are biased.
  • ad hoc to paper Metric reference depth (or equivalent global scale) is available as an input at inference.
    Algorithm 1 consumes d_ref and s to build motion pseudo-videos; without specifying how metric scale is obtained from a single image, the 'metric-scale globally aligned' output is underdetermined.
  • domain assumption Multi-view epipolar consistency learned on synthetic UE5 and lab TACO data transfers to in-the-wild HOI scenes.
    Sec. 3.5: final curriculum trains on TACO only (12-view lab); in-the-wild generalization demos rely on this transfer.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18837 in / 14227 out tokens · 118355 ms · 2026-08-01T19:01:25.923777+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hand-Object Interaction (HOI) synthesis is a cornerstone for animation production and embodied AI. Despite the strong priors of video foundation models, multi-view consistent HOI synthesis remains challenging due to complex hand motions and occlusions. We present HarmoHOI, a unified diffusion framework that jointly and harmoniously generates synchronized multi-view HOI videos and globally aligned 3D point tracks. Our core insight is that robust multi-view consistency fundamentally requires globally aligned 3D geometry and motion. To this end, we propose a Mixture of Multi-view Diffusion Transformer that co-models RGB videos and 3D point tracks. By representing point tracks as pseudo-videos, we align 3D geometric signals with the 2D latent space of foundation models, thereby minimizing the domain gap and easing adaptation of priors. To further ensure geometry consistency, we introduce Global Motion Aligning Diffusion, which refines coarse point tracks into metric-scale, globally aligned 3D trajectories. HarmoHOI enables on-the-fly co-evolution of 2D appearance and 3D motion during denoising. To overcome the scarcity of multi-view HOI data, we employ a hybrid data curriculum learning strategy that successfully transfers generic priors from single-view data to synchronized multi-view generation. Experimental results show that HarmoHOI achieves state-of-the-art performance in visual quality, motion plausibility, and multi-view geometric consistency. Project page available at https://droliven.github.io/HarmoHOI_project.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17097 by Hongwen Zhang, Juntong Li, Liang An, Lingwei Dang, Qingyao Wu, Wei Min, Yebin Liu, Zonghan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our HarmoHOI jointly models the consistency between 2D visual appearance and 3D motion, and learns the synchronization of multi-view epipolar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Our HarmoHOI framework comprises two key components: First, the Mixture of Multi-view Diffusion Transformer (𝑀2DiT) generates synchronized multi-view RGB videos, intermediate motion pseudo videos, and global metric scales (Sec. 3.3). Second, the Global Motion Aligning Diffusion (GloMAD) takes the resulting coarse 3D point tracks as a conditioning signal to reconstruct globally aligned point track sequences… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hybrid-data progressive curriculum learning. HarmoHOI is trained progressively from single-view geometry-aware learning, to multi-view appearance synchronization, and finally to unified multi-view appearance-geometry learning, thereby preserving pretrained visual priors while gradually injecting multi-view geometric consistency. accurate 3D motion dynamics. By contrast, large-scale in-the-wild HOI videos [… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of the generated multi-view videos from different methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of multi-view 3D points. Baseline methods exhibit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In the wild single-view generalization demonstration. From top to bottom are the generated 2D videos, motion pseudo-video, and 3D point tracks. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: In the wild multi-view generalization demonstration, we showcase a HOI case of “slicing red chilies”: the first row shows prompts (reference image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of multi-view hand-object interaction videos and the corresponding globally aligned 3D point tracks. From left to right are two different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Generalization to UNSEEN HOI tasks: multi-view synchronized 2D video and 3D point track generation results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: HOI generation results of top-ranked video models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. StreamHOI: Interaction-aware Temporal Memory Adaptation for Streaming HOI Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A streaming image-to-video model that assigns block-specific sink/local memory and learned RoPE distance scaling preserves long human-object interactions under bounded latency.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

190 extracted references · 15 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries

    Sarah Cohen and Werner Nutt and Yehoshua Sagic. Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries. doi:10.1145/1219092.1219093

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Special issue: Digital Libraries. 1996

    1996

  3. [3]

    Understanding Policy-Based Networking

    David Kosiur. Understanding Policy-Based Networking

  4. [6]

    doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

    The title of book two. doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

    doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

  5. [7]

    Asad Z. Spector. Achieving application requirements. Distributed Systems. doi:10.1145/90417.90738

    arXiv

  6. [8]

    Douglass and David Harel and Mark B

    Bruce P. Douglass and David Harel and Mark B. Trakhtenbrot. Statecarts in use: structured analysis and object-orientation. Lectures on Embedded Systems. doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29

    doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29

  7. [9]

    Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd. ed.)

  8. [10]

    Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming

  9. [11]

    Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol)

    Dan Geiger and Christopher Meek. Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol). Proceedings of Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, The Barbados

  10. [12]

    Stan W. Smith. An experiment in bibliographic mark-up: Parsing metadata for XML export. Proceedings of the 3rd. annual workshop on Librarians and Computers

  11. [13]

    Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms

    Matthew Van Gundy and Davide Balzarotti and Giovanni Vigna. Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms. Proceedings of the first USENIX workshop on Offensive Technologies

  12. [14]

    Predicate Path expressions

    Sten Andler. Predicate Path expressions. Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. doi:10.1145/567752.567774

    arXiv

  13. [15]

    LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER

    David Harel. LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER

  14. [16]

    Anisi , title =

    David A. Anisi , title =

  15. [17]

    Clarkson

    Kenneth L. Clarkson. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry)

  16. [18]

    Introduction to Bayesian Statistics

    Harry Thornburg. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. 2001

    2001

  17. [19]

    CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11

    Rafal Ablamowicz and Bertfried Fauser. CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11. 2007

    2007

  18. [20]

    Stats and Analysis

    Poker-Edge.Com. Stats and Analysis. 2006

    2006

  19. [21]

    A more perfect union

    Barack Obama. A more perfect union

  20. [22]

    The fountain of youth

    Joseph Scientist. The fountain of youth

  21. [23]

    Solder man

    Dave Novak. Solder man. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Video Review on Animation theater Program: Part I - Vol. 145 (July 27--27, 2003). doi:10.945/woot07-S422

    2003

  22. [24]

    Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005

    Newton Lee. Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005. Comput. Entertain. doi:10.1145/1057270.1057278

    arXiv 2005

  23. [25]

    The Enabling of Digital Libraries

    Bernard Rous. The Enabling of Digital Libraries. Digital Libraries

  24. [27]

    (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =

    Werneck, Renato and Setubal, Jo\. (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =. doi:10.1145/351827.384253 , acmid = 384253, publisher =

    arXiv

  25. [29]

    and Mei, Alessandro , title =

    Conti, Mauro and Di Pietro, Roberto and Mancini, Luigi V. and Mei, Alessandro , title =. Inf. Fusion , volume =. 2009 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 , acmid =

    doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 2009

  26. [30]

    and Hutchful, David K

    Li, Cheng-Lun and Buyuktur, Ayse G. and Hutchful, David K. and Sant, Natasha B. and Nainwal, Satyendra K. , title =. CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358946 , acmid =

    arXiv

  27. [31]

    , title =

    Hollis, Billy S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    1999

  28. [32]

    Goossens, Michel and Rahtz, S. P. and Moore, Ross and Sutor, Robert S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    1999

  29. [33]

    and Rosenberg, Arnold L

    Buss, Jonathan F. and Rosenberg, Arnold L. and Knott, Judson D. , title =. 1987 , source =

    1987

  30. [34]

    CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

    , note =. CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

  31. [35]

    Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

    Clarkson, Kenneth Lee , advisor =. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

  32. [36]

    SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. , year =

  33. [37]

    2004 , isbn =

    IEEE TCSC Executive Committee , booktitle =. 2004 , isbn =. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2004.64 , acmid =

    doi:10.1109/icws.2004.64 2004

  34. [38]

    Distributed systems (2nd Ed.) , year =

  35. [39]

    , title =

    Petrie, Charles J. , title =. 1986 , source =

    1986

  36. [40]

    Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1981

    1981

  37. [41]

    E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , Title =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =

  38. [42]

    E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , type =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =

  39. [43]

    Chapter 9 , booktitle =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. Chapter 9 , booktitle =

  40. [44]

    E-commerce and cultural values , editor =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , title =. E-commerce and cultural values , editor =. 2003 , isbn =

    2003

  41. [45]

    E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =. 2004 , address =

    2004

  42. [46]

    E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =. 2005 , address =

    2005

  43. [47]

    E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =. 2006 , address =

    2006

  44. [48]

    Microelectron

    Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi , title =. Microelectron. J. , volume =. 2010 , pages =

    2010

  45. [49]

    Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi and Zahra Sasanian , title =. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. , volume =

  46. [50]

    Kirschmer, Markus and Voight, John , title =. SIAM J. Comput. , issue_date =. 2010 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/080734467 , acmid =

    doi:10.1137/080734467 2010

  47. [51]

    Hoare, C. A. R. , title =. Structured programming (incoll) , editor =. 1972 , isbn =

    1972

  48. [52]

    History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =

    Lee, Jan , title =. History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =. 1981 , isbn =. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800025.1198348 , acmid =

    arXiv 1981

  49. [53]

    , title =

    Dijkstra, E. , title =. Classics in software engineering (incoll) , year =

  50. [54]

    , title =

    Wenzel, Elizabeth M. , title =. Multimedia interface design (incoll) , year =. doi:10.1145/146022.146089 , acmid =

    arXiv

  51. [55]

    , title =

    Mumford, E. , title =. Critical issues in information systems research (incoll) , year =

  52. [56]

    and Golden, Donald G

    McCracken, Daniel D. and Golden, Donald G. , title =. 1990 , isbn =

    1990

  53. [57]

    The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    H. The analysis of linear partial differential operators. 1985 , PAGES =

    1985

  54. [58]

    IEEE", address =

    A. Adya and P. Bahl and J. Padhye and A.Wolman and L. Zhou , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Broadnets Networks (BroadNets'04) , publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =

  55. [59]

    I. F. Akyildiz and W. Su and Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci , title =. Comm. ACM , volume = 38, number = "4", year =

  56. [60]

    I. F. Akyildiz and T. Melodia and K. R. Chowdhury , title =. Computer Netw. , volume = 51, number = "4", year =

  57. [61]

    ACM", address =

    P. Bahl and R. Chancre and J. Dungeon , title =. Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'04) , publisher = "ACM", address = "New York, NY", year =

  58. [62]

    8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)

    D. Culler and D. Estrin and M. Srivastava , title =. IEEE Comput. , volume = 37, number = "8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)", publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =

  59. [63]

    Natarajan and M

    A. Natarajan and M. Motani and B. de Silva and K. Yap and K. C. Chua , title =. Network Architectures , editor =. 960935712

  60. [64]

    Tzamaloukas and J

    A. Tzamaloukas and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves , title =

  61. [65]

    Zhou and J

    G. Zhou and J. Lu and C.-Y. Wan and M. D. Yarvis and J. A. Stankovic , title =

  62. [66]

    Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes

    Jacob Kornerup. Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes. 1994

    1994

  63. [67]

    Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

    Michael Gerndt. Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

  64. [68]

    J. E. Archer, Jr. and R. Conway and F. B. Schneider. User recovery and reversal in interactive systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  65. [69]

    D. D. Dunlop and V. R. Basili. Generalizing specifications for uniformly implemented loops. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  66. [70]

    Heering and P

    J. Heering and P. Klint. Towards monolingual programming environments. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  67. [71]

    Donald E. Knuth. The book

  68. [72]

    Korach and D

    E. Korach and D. Rotem and N. Santoro. Distributed algorithms for finding centers and medians in networks. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  69. [73]

    : A Document Preparation System

    Leslie Lamport. : A Document Preparation System

  70. [74]

    F. Nielson. Program transformations in a denotational setting. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  71. [75]

    Brian K. Reid. A high-level approach to computer document formatting. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

  72. [76]

    and Abdelzaher, Tarek F

    Zhou, Gang and Wu, Yafeng and Yan, Ting and He, Tian and Huang, Chengdu and Stankovic, John A. and Abdelzaher, Tarek F. , title =. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/1721695.1721705 , acmid = 1721705, publisher =

    arXiv

  73. [77]

    Institutional members of the Users Group

  74. [78]

    Boris Veytsman , title =

  75. [79]

    Robin Schneider , title =

  76. [80]

    and Peterson, Larry L

    Bowman, Mic and Debray, Saumya K. and Peterson, Larry L. , title =. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  77. [81]

    TUGboat , volume =

    Braams, Johannes , title =. TUGboat , volume =

  78. [82]

    Post Congress Tristesse

    Malcolm Clark. Post Congress Tristesse. TeX90 Conference Proceedings

  79. [83]

    ACM Trans

    Herlihy, Maurice , title =. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  80. [84]

    Salas and Einar Hille

    S.L. Salas and Einar Hille. Calculus: One and Several Variable. 1978

    1978

Showing first 80 references.