Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The paper presents the three-loop BFKL eigenvalue at every odd conformal spin as an exact closed form in nested harmonic sums on an integer-shifted ladder, derived from the three-loop integrand and verified spin by spin through n=91.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:29 UTC pith:7APDIHEV

load-bearing objection Real per-spin closed forms at odd spin, with unusually good scaffolding — but the continuous-ν dependence is anchored only at ν=0, and the 'derived vs fitted' wording should be fixed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17613 v2 pith:7APDIHEV submitted 2026-07-20 hep-th

The next-to-next-to-leading order BFKL eigenvalue at odd conformal spin in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills: closed form, coefficient structure, and arithmetic

Alexander Prygarin , Claudelle Capasia Madjuogang Sandeu This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords BFKL eigenvalueN=4 super Yang-Millsnested harmonic sumsthree-loop integrandMellin transformQuantum Spectral Curvehermitian separabilityconformal spin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that the three-loop (next-to-next-to-leading-order) BFKL eigenvalue of planar N=4 super Yang-Mills, until now known in closed form only on two vertical lines (n=0, n=1) and the horizontal line nu=0, is an exact closed form at every odd conformal spin: a finite combination of analytically continued nested harmonic sums and rational functions evaluated at the integer-shifted arguments z+k running from the reflected endpoint -zbar to z and one step beyond. If true, this matters because it makes the eigenvalue's pole structure, uniform transcendental weight five, and additive hermitian separability explicit at generic (n,nu), and it shows the three-loop object lives in the same function class as the leading and next-to-leading orders — a structural fact, not a coincidence, once the integrand's harmonic-polylogarithm alphabet is granted. The per-spin atom tables are exact rational extractions of the three-loop integrand, regenerable on demand by a shipped command, and at nu=0 the resulting intercepts reproduce independent spectral-curve values spin by spin through n=91, including 26 out-of-sample spins. The paper also reports a proved arithmetic law on the raw coefficient data — a fresh denominator prime at every spin n=p+2 with n-2 prime — which, if it continues, rules out algebraic or globally bounded generating data for those coefficients while remaining consistent with holonomy.

Core claim

Presented is a closed form for the three-loop BFKL eigenvalue of planar N=4 super Yang-Mills at every odd conformal spin: chi2(n,nu)=1/4[F_n(z)+F_n(zbar)], with z=(|n|-1)/2+inu and F_n a finite combination of analytically continued nested harmonic sums, rational functions, and the constants {zeta2,zeta3,zeta4,zeta5,ln2,Li4(1/2),zeta2 zeta3}, evaluated on the integer-shifted ladder z+k, k=-(n-1),...,1, from the reflected endpoint -zbar to z and one step beyond. Every coefficient is an exact rational multiple of 1, pi^2, or zeta3, derived as a Mellin moment of the three-loop integrand; about 85% of coefficient slots close in an elementary basis of harmonic sums in the two ladder distances, and

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The Mellin rule u^l ln^j u |-> 2(-1)^j j!/(l+1+2inu)^{j+1}, applied to the three-loop integrand, sends each monomial to a rational function of an integer-shifted point z+k, so all nu-dependence enters only through shifted harmonic-sum arguments. Exact partial fractions then reduce every dressed atom to sixteen one-variable kernels NL_{v,j}(w)=sum_{N>=1}(-1)^N S_v(N)/(N+w)^j, which close in the harmonic-sum class by first-order difference equations and a periodicity-uniqueness lemma (eleven proven, five confirmed numerically). A principal-part cancellation between rational and alternating sectors at the interior integer gap points makes the completed sums re

Load-bearing premise

The reduction to nested harmonic sums rests on the assertion that the three-loop integrand at every odd conformal spin is a harmonic polylogarithm in the three-letter alphabet {0,+1,-1}, a property verified on all spins through n=91 but not proven for all n; if a single odd-spin integrand contained the cyclotomic letter i*sqrt(x) seen at even spin, the eigenvalue would leave the claimed function class.

What would settle it

Run the shipped Mellin extractor at a spin beyond the verified range, say n=101 or n=127, and (1) check that the integrand still uses only the letters {0,+1,-1} and (2) compare the resulting nu=0 intercept with the independent numerical value from spectral-curve methods. A new letter class or an intercept mismatch beyond the numeric floor would show the closed form is not valid at every odd spin; likewise, a denominator prime greater than n-2, or a missing prime at most n-2, in any raw coefficient at such n would disprove the prime law's continuation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The full analytic content of the eigenvalue — pole structure in nu, uniform transcendental weight five, additively separable hermitian form — becomes explicit at every odd spin, where previously only numeric values and a few special lines (n=0, n=1, nu=0) were known in closed form.
  • The exact per-spin atom tables supply reproducible boundary data: any independent determination of the three-loop high-energy evolution must agree spin by spin, and any new odd spin n>=3 can be regenerated on demand rather than read from a table.
  • The function class matches the leading and next-to-leading orders, so the odd-spin eigenvalue is the natural candidate for the highest-transcendentality part of the corresponding QCD eigenvalue at arbitrary odd spin.
  • If the conjectured master generating function is right, the same closed master contains the even spins as well; the even case is checked through m=6 and would require half-integer ladder shifts.
  • If the prime law continues, the exceptional coefficient grids can never be algebraic or globally bounded generating data — a hard constraint on any future all-n closed form for those seven slots.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct check the authors leave implicit: running the regenerator at a spin well beyond 91 (say 101 or 127) and comparing its nu=0 intercept against independent spectral-curve numerics would immediately test whether the alphabet hypothesis and the prime law continue; nothing in the paper's structure prevents this.
  • The n=p+2 onset law says prime p first appears at exactly spin p+2 — the same first-appearance pattern seen in denominators of harmonic numbers H_k; if that is not a coincidence, the exceptional coefficients may be expressible through harmonic-sum-like objects whose denominator arithmetic is known, potentially closing the five-kernel gap.
  • The gauge-dependence of the kernel onsets (only Kcw3's n=19 is stable) suggests the onset staircase is a property of the chosen elementary basis rather than of the eigenvalue; a basis-independent invariant might be the rank of the exceptional layer, which the data fix at exactly one.
  • Should the odd-spin reduction extend to even spins through half-integer shifts, the eigenvalue at even n would presumably involve cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms, matching the even-spin integrand's letter i*sqrt(x); the same spectral-curve intercept line would then provide a ready-made test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to give, for every odd conformal spin n, a closed form for the three-loop (NNLO) BFKL eigenvalue in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills, χ2(n,ν) = (1/4)[F_n(z)+F_n(zbar)] with z=(|n|-1)/2+iν. The holomorphic block F_n is assembled from continued nested harmonic sums and rational functions of z, evaluated on the integer-shifted ladder z+k, k=-(n-1),...,1. The per-spin atom tables are obtained by exact rational Mellin extraction from the Caron-Huot-Herranen three-loop integrand at that spin; a shipped command regenerates any odd n≥3 table. A master generating function that resums the conformal spin is formulated and conjectured to match the CHH integrands, but is explicitly not used for the per-spin tables. At ν=0 the intercepts reproduce independent Quantum Spectral Curve values through n=91, with 26 spins out of sample. Coefficients are rational combinations of 1, π^2, ζ_3; 40 of 47 coefficient slots close in an elementary basis of two ladder distances, while the residual five-kernel layer is analyzed through a holonomic recurrence and a finite denominator-prime law proved through n=91 and conjectured to continue. The central claim is presented as an exact spin-by-spin closed form, with several clearly labelled conjectures and negative results.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is a substantial advance: the first ν-dependent closed form at NNLO for odd conformal spin, with exact rational extraction from the CHH integrand, reproducible code, and strong out-of-sample QSC agreement at ν=0. The paper is unusually careful in separating derived results from conjectures, shipping machine-readable exact tables, and reporting negative results and gauge dependencies. The strengths include: exact rational verification of the master at finite order, bit-identical reproduction of surviving prior tables, a concrete holonomic recurrence verified on holdout, and a transparent conditional arithmetic obstruction. The main risks are two load-bearing proof gaps — the odd-spin alphabet assumption and the five numerically verified kernel closures — and the fact that independent physical validation of the full ν-dependence is confined to the ν=0 line. These make the result highly plausible but not yet fully rigorous as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Sec. 2.3] The all-spin closed form rests on the statement that, for odd m, the CHH integrand is a harmonic polylogarithm of weight at most four in the level-two alphabet {0,+1,-1}. This is verified on every computed odd spin through n=91, but no proof from the parity selection of the projection is given. If a cyclotomic letter i√x appeared at some odd m, the Mellin transform would leave the nested-harmonic-sum class and Eq. (4.1) would not provide a closed form in the stated class. Please either prove the alphabet property for all odd m or state the main theorem as conditional on this finite verification.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Table 1, App. D] Five of the sixteen kernel closures (NL_(1),3, NL_(-2),2, NL_(1,1),2, NL_(-2,1),1, NL_(1,-2),1) are marked 'verified' numerically rather than proven. These kernels are used to reduce every dressed alternating atom, so the exactness of F_n at arbitrary ν is not rigorously established. The paper's own definition of closed form in Sec. 4.1 says the one-variable identities are 'proven save for five kernels confirmed numerically.' This is a load-bearing gap. The authors should either supply proofs or explicitly reformulate the central claim as conditional on these five identities.
  3. [Sec. 8.3, Sec. 8.4] Independently of the proof gaps, the physical validation of the full ν-dependence is weak. The QSC comparison probes only the ν=0 line, and the end-to-end ν≠0 comparison of Sec. 8.3 is against a series evaluator sharing the same atom tables; the paper itself notes that common-mode truncation error cancels. Thus a systematic error in the exact Mellin extraction that happens to vanish at z=M would pass all reported checks while corrupting χ2(n,ν) away from ν=0. The single n=3 numerical curve does not constrain higher spins. I recommend either adding independent full-ν checks at several higher odd spins (e.g., direct numerical evaluation of the CHH eigenvalue representation) or stating explicitly that the ν≠0 domain is validated only internally.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6.6)] The displayed sum for R_k(z) has no visible upper limit in Eq. (6.6); it should read −Σ_{m=k+1}^{0} 1/(z+m) for k≤0. Please clarify the notation.
  2. [Sec. 2.1 vs Sec. 3] The symbol ω is used both for the Regge trajectory in Eq. (2.1) and for the spin-generating variable in Sec. 3 and Eq. (3.5). Although Sec. 3 announces the distinction, the double use can confuse readers; a different symbol for the spin-generating variable would help.
  3. [App. E.3] The abbreviation 'dps' is used without definition; please define it as the decimal precision in mpmath (e.g., dps = decimal digits of working precision).
  4. [Table 4] The n=3 entry '1' in the denominator-max-prime column is unconventional; label it as 'unit denominator' to avoid implying that 1 is a prime.
  5. [Sec. 3.4, App. F] The phrase 'byte-identically in the same build environment' is environment-dependent and weaker than the intended invariant. Suggest replacing it with 'record-for-record identical' as the precise claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central per-spin result is an exact Mellin extraction of the external Caron-Huot–Herranen integrand; master function is conjectural and quarantined; independent QSC comparison at ν=0 is genuine and out-of-sample.

full rationale

The derivation chain is anchored to an external input, the Caron-Huot–Herranen three-loop integrand [13], and the per-spin atom tables are direct exact Mellin extractions of that integrand (Secs. 3.1, 3.4). The resummed master generating function is explicitly labeled conjectural: Conjecture 1 is 'not needed for the per-spin tables' and is quarantined from them. The reduction to nested harmonic sums proceeds through proven tower identities and partial-fraction algebra (Secs. 4.2–4.3, App. A), with the sixteen one-variable kernel closures justified in App. D (eleven proven, five numerically verified by independent methods), not by circular definition. The ν=0 agreement with the independent Quantum Spectral Curve values [19] is a genuine benchmark: the paper reports out-of-sample high-spin intercepts and states those rows were not used to fix the construction. The coefficient catalog is explicitly 'fitted, then verified' on holdout cells rather than presented as a first-principles prediction. The acknowledged limitations — the end-to-end series evaluator shares the same atom tables, five kernel closures are numerically verified not proven, and the QSC comparison probes only ν=0 — are validation-scope caveats stated in the paper, not circular reductions. Self-citations to the authors' reflection-identity program are background and are explicitly said not to appear verbatim in the final formula. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central derivation pulls from the prior literature the CHH integrand, the harmonic-sum continuation apparatus (GLMS/Vermaseren/Blumlein), and standard diagonal/Eisenstein/Christol theorems. It adds one honest conjecture (the master, Conjecture 1, quarantined), one fitted-verified catalog, three fitted structural layers (basis, catalog constants, recurrence), and a conditional corollary (Conjecture 4). No new physical degrees of freedom are invented; the new objects are mathematical.

free parameters (3)
  • elementary catalog coefficient constants (window alpha/beta and S1/S2/S-2 family constants, e.g. the 48 in Eq. (4.9)) = fixed by exact-rational fit on n<=49; refit on n<=17 is byte-identical
    Section 5.2 / Table 8: 'fitted, verified'. The all-spin forms are Conjecture 2. These constants are load-bearing for the claimed 40/47 slot closure, though verified on 56595 holdout cells.
  • holonomic recurrence operator coefficients (68 integers c_{a,b,s,t}) = unique null space fixed on 156 interior cells (M=1..13, n<=27)
    Section 5.5: fitted, then annihilates the 26-cell bridge and 1710 holdout cells exactly; evidence for holonomy, not a proof.
  • elementary basis choice including the min-distance block = basis fixed by hand; dropping the min-distance block moves closing slots from 40 to 32
    Section 5.2: the 40/47 and 85% figures are basis-dependent, a point the authors disclose.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The Caron-Huot-Herranen three-loop integrand is correct and is the single external input
    Section 1.4: 'The single external input is the Caron-Huot-Herranen three-loop integrand [13]'; all per-spin tables inherit its correctness.
  • domain assumption Odd-spin CHH integrands are harmonic polylogarithms of weight at most four in the level-two alphabet {0,+1,-1}
    Section 3.1: 'verified on every computed odd spin... and expected from the parity selection'; the harmonic-sum classification depends on it and is verified only finitely.
  • domain assumption The even-branch analytic continuation of nested harmonic sums ((-1)^w := +1) is the relevant continuation
    Section 2.2, App. A.1; the ladder identities (Phi_q = -(S_{-q} + eta(q)), etc.) are proven relative to it.
  • ad hoc to paper All sixteen kernel closures hold (eleven proven via the periodicity-uniqueness lemma; five verified numerically to at least 40 digits)
    Table 1 / App. D; the full-nu closed form depends on all sixteen closures.
  • standard math Furstenberg, Christol/globally-bounded and Eisenstein theorems apply to the diagonal and coefficient-arithmetic arguments
    Section 7.2, Corollary 1; requires the cone/iterated-Laurent regularity stated in Section 5.6.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 4: the prime-accumulation law continues past n=91
    Corollary 1's non-algebraicity / global-boundedness conclusion is conditional on this continuation; the exceptional-sector weight grading also passes through Conjecture 1.
invented entities (2)
  • master generating function F(x;omega) over the omega-alphabet independent evidence
    purpose: resums the conformal spin inside the CHH projection so that [omega^m]F = I_m(x) for every spin
    Conjecture 1. Evidence: exact rational agreement through u16 at five rational omega, spins through 17, and at m=9,11,13,15,21,31; even spins through m=6. The authors quarantine it from the per-spin tables.
  • five-kernel exceptional layer (KR1, KR2, KR3, Kcw3, Kcw2) and the collapsed two-letter form independent evidence
    purpose: carries the residual 7/47 coefficient slots after projection onto the elementary basis
    A structural object, not a new physical degree of freedom. Evidence: finite-data holonomic recurrence (Sec. 5.5), the prime law (Thm. 1), and the exact collapse of the kernel-weighted ladder onto psi(z+1)+gamma_E and Phi(-1,2,z+1) (Sec. 6).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 60003 in / 20045 out tokens · 180297 ms · 2026-08-01T17:29:58.384826+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the three-loop (next-to-next-to-leading order) BFKL eigenvalue of planar N=4 super Yang-Mills at odd conformal spin n in closed form, as a finite combination of continued nested harmonic sums and rational functions of z=(|n|-1)/2 + i nu on an integer-shifted ladder. For each odd spin the atom table is extracted exactly, in rational arithmetic, from the Caron-Huot-Herranen three-loop integrand; a shipped command regenerates it for any odd n>=3, with n=1 a supplied boundary block. A resummed master generating function, conjectured to reproduce those integrands at every spin (verified through n=17 and at m=9,11,13,15,21,31), is not used for the per-spin tables. At nu=0 the intercepts reproduce the independent Quantum Spectral Curve values spin by spin through n=91. The coefficients are rational multiples of 1, pi^2 and zeta_3; in a fixed elementary basis, forty of the forty-seven slots close as harmonic sums of the two ladder distances (all-spin form conjectural). The residual five-kernel layer includes one grid obeying a holonomic recurrence; once the harmonic sums are separated the coefficient-weighted ladder collapses onto two depth-one polygamma transcendentals. We report an arithmetic obstruction: the exceptional-grid coefficients recruit a new denominator prime at each n=p+2 (n-2 prime) through the computed range, a finite law we prove and conjecture to continue; on that continuation their generating data cannot be algebraic or globally bounded. Even spins are conjecturally contained in the same master. At each odd spin the eigenvalue is the product-free case of the Kotikov-Lipatov hermitian-separable form. A companion Letter announces the result.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The next-to-next-to-leading order BFKL eigenvalue at odd conformal spin in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    The NNLO BFKL eigenvalue of planar N=4 SYM is now in closed form at every odd spin n, with ν=0 intercepts matching Quantum Spectral Curve data through n=91.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The next-to-next-to-leading order BFKL eigenvalue at odd conformal spin in planarN= 4 super Yang–Mills,

    A. Prygarin and C. C. Madjuogang Sandeu, “The next-to-next-to-leading order BFKL eigenvalue at odd conformal spin in planarN= 4 super Yang–Mills,” [arXiv:2607.17608]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories,

    V. S. Fadin, E. A. Kuraev and L. N. Lipatov, “On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories,” Phys. Lett. B60(1975) 50

    1975

  3. [3]

    The Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories,

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin, “The Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories,” Sov. Phys. JETP45(1977) 199

    1977

  4. [4]

    The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromody- namics,

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, “The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromody- namics,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.28(1978) 822

    1978

  5. [5]

    The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics,

    L. N. Lipatov, “The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics,” Sov. Phys. JETP63 (1986) 904

    1986

  6. [6]

    Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high energies in connection with exactly solvable spin models,

    L. N. Lipatov, “Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high energies in connection with exactly solvable spin models,” JETP Lett.59(1994) 596 [arXiv:hep-th/9311037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model,

    L. D. Faddeev and G. P. Korchemsky, “High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model,” Phys. Lett. B342(1995) 311 [arXiv:hep-th/9404173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation,

    V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov, “BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation,” Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 127 [arXiv:hep-ph/9802290]. 55

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation,

    M. Ciafaloni and G. Camici, “Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation,” Phys. Lett. B430(1998) 349 [arXiv:hep-ph/9803389]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    NLO corrections to the BFKL equation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “NLO corrections to the BFKL equation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 19 [arXiv:hep-ph/0004008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    DGLAP and BFKL equations in the N = 4 supersym- metric gauge theory,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “DGLAP and BFKL equations in the N = 4 supersym- metric gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B661(2003) 19 [Erratum: Nucl. Phys. B685(2004) 405] [arXiv:hep-ph/0208220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    On the highest transcendentality in N = 4 SUSY,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “On the highest transcendentality in N = 4 SUSY,” Nucl. Phys. B769(2007) 217 [arXiv:hep-th/0611204]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    High-energy evolution to three loops,

    S. Caron-Huot and M. Herranen, “High-energy evolution to three loops,” JHEP02(2018) 058 [arXiv:1604.07417]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    High-energy evolution in planar QCD to three loops: the non-conformal contribution,

    G. Brunello, S. Caron-Huot, G. Crisanti, M. Giroux and S. Smith, “High-energy evolution in planar QCD to three loops: the non-conformal contribution,” JHEP11(2025) 055 [arXiv:2508.03794]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Quantum Spectral Curve for Planar N= 4 Super-Yang–Mills Theory,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin, “Quantum Spectral Curve for Planar N= 4 Super-Yang–Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 011602 [arXiv:1305.1939]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    QCD Pomeron from AdS/CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov and V. Kazakov, “QCD Pomeron from AdS/CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,” JHEP07(2015) 164 [arXiv:1408.2530]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Pomeron Eigenvalue at Three Loops in N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Theory,

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and G. Sizov, “Pomeron Eigenvalue at Three Loops in N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 251601 [arXiv:1507.04010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    BFKL pomeron in the next-to-next-to-leading approximation in the planarN= 4 SYM theory,

    V. N. Velizhanin, “BFKL pomeron in the next-to-next-to-leading approximation in the planarN= 4 SYM theory,” [arXiv:1508.02857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    BFKL spectrum of N = 4 SYM: non-zero conformal spin,

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov and G. Sizov, “BFKL spectrum of N = 4 SYM: non-zero conformal spin,” JHEP07(2018) 181 [arXiv:1802.06908]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Long Range Asymptotic Baxter–Bethe Ansatz forN= 4 BFKL,

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and M. Preti, “Long Range Asymptotic Baxter–Bethe Ansatz forN= 4 BFKL,” [arXiv:2406.18639]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Regge trajectories of N = 4 SYM. Part I. General Asymptotic Baxter–Bethe Ansatz,

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and M. Preti, “Regge trajectories of N = 4 SYM. Part I. General Asymptotic Baxter–Bethe Ansatz,” JHEP02(2026) 027 [arXiv:2507.15983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    NNNLLA BFKL pomeron eigenvalue in the planar N = 4 SYM theory,

    V. N. Velizhanin, “NNNLLA BFKL pomeron eigenvalue in the planar N = 4 SYM theory,” [arXiv:2106.06527]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Reflection identities of harmonic sums up to weight three,

    A. Prygarin, “Reflection identities of harmonic sums up to weight three,” [arXiv:1808.09307]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Reflection identities of harmonic sums of weight four,

    A. Prygarin, “Reflection identities of harmonic sums of weight four,” Universe5(2019) 77 [arXiv:1809.06696]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    The analytic structure of the BFKL equation and reflection identities of harmonic sums at weight five,

    M. Joubat and A. Prygarin, “The analytic structure of the BFKL equation and reflection identities of harmonic sums at weight five,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34(2019) 1950064 [arXiv:1903.06773]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    BFKL Eigenvalue and Maximal Alternation of Harmonic Sums,

    A. Prygarin, “BFKL Eigenvalue and Maximal Alternation of Harmonic Sums,” Nucl. Phys. B947(2019) 114734 [arXiv:1901.05248]. 56

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Reflection Identities of Harmonic Sums and pole decomposition of BFKL eigenvalue,

    M. Joubat and A. Prygarin, “Reflection Identities of Harmonic Sums and pole decomposition of BFKL eigenvalue,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36(2021) 2150025 [arXiv:2011.08095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Real Valued Functions for the BFKL Eigenvalue,

    M. Joubat and A. Prygarin, “Real Valued Functions for the BFKL Eigenvalue,” Universe7 (2021) 444 [arXiv:2109.12904]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Universal transcendentality limit of BFKL eigenvalue,

    M. Joubat and A. Prygarin, “Universal transcendentality limit of BFKL eigenvalue,” Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 45 [arXiv:2111.11664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Hermitian separability and transition from singlet to adjoint BFKL equations inN= 4 super Yang–Mills Theory,

    S. Bondarenko and A. Prygarin, “Hermitian separability and transition from singlet to adjoint BFKL equations inN= 4 super Yang–Mills Theory,” [arXiv:1510.00589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Hermitian separability of BFKL eigenvalue in Bethe–Salpeter approach,

    M. Joubat and A. Prygarin, “Hermitian separability of BFKL eigenvalue in Bethe–Salpeter approach,” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1183 [arXiv:2007.15388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals,

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, “Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 2037 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806280]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  33. [33]

    Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two loop order,

    J. Bl¨ umlein and S. Kurth, “Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two loop order,” Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 014018 [arXiv:hep-ph/9810241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  34. [34]

    Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to Weight w= 5,

    J. Bl¨ umlein, “Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to Weight w= 5,” Comput. Phys. Commun.180(2009) 2218 [arXiv:0901.3106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Polylogarithms and Associated Functions,

    L. Lewin, “Polylogarithms and Associated Functions,” North-Holland, New York/Amsterdam (1981)

    1981

  36. [36]

    Algebraic relations between harmonic sums and associated quantities,

    J. Bl¨ umlein, “Algebraic relations between harmonic sums and associated quantities,” Com- put. Phys. Commun.159(2004) 19 [arXiv:hep-ph/0311046]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  37. [37]

    Harmonic polylogarithms,

    E. Remiddi and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “Harmonic polylogarithms,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15 (2000) 725 [arXiv:hep-ph/9905237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Algebraic functions over finite fields,

    H. Furstenberg, “Algebraic functions over finite fields,” J. Algebra7(1967) 271

    1967

  39. [39]

    ¨Uber eine allgemeine Eigenschaft der Reihen-Entwicklungen aller algebrais- chen Functionen,

    G. Eisenstein, “ ¨Uber eine allgemeine Eigenschaft der Reihen-Entwicklungen aller algebrais- chen Functionen,” Bericht ¨ uber die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (1852) 441

  40. [40]

    Globally bounded solutions of differential equations,

    G. Christol, “Globally bounded solutions of differential equations,” inAnalytic Number Theory (Tokyo, 1988), Lecture Notes in Math.1434, Springer (1990) 45

    1988

  41. [41]

    Algebraic power series and diagonals,

    J. Denef and L. Lipshitz, “Algebraic power series and diagonals,” J. Number Theory26 (1987) 46

    1987

  42. [42]

    The diagonal of a D-finite power series is D-finite,

    L. Lipshitz, “The diagonal of a D-finite power series is D-finite,” J. Algebra113(1988) 373

    1988

  43. [43]

    On some series containing ψ(x) −ψ (y) and ( ψ(x) −ψ (y))2 for certain values ofxandy,

    P. J. De Doelder, “On some series containing ψ(x) −ψ (y) and ( ψ(x) −ψ (y))2 for certain values ofxandy,” J. Comput. Appl. Math.37(1991) 125

    1991

  44. [44]

    Explicit evaluation of Euler sums,

    D. Borwein, J. M. Borwein and R. Girgensohn, “Explicit evaluation of Euler sums,” Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc.38(1995) 277

    1995

  45. [45]

    Euler sums and contour integral representations,

    P. Flajolet and B. Salvy, “Euler sums and contour integral representations,” Experiment. Math.7(1998) 15

    1998

  46. [46]

    Sur une classe de s´ eries de Taylor,

    F. Carlson, “Sur une classe de s´ eries de Taylor,” Dissertation, Uppsala University, 1914. 57

    1914