Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Smearing dual-resonance amplitudes over continuous Regge slopes yields fully unitary, local, analytic S-matrices with controllable second-sheet resonances.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:46 UTC pith:4MHVKEMB

load-bearing objection Real construction of unitary dual-resonance amplitudes via Regge-slope smearing; the analyticity work is solid, the global unitarity claim is still one tuned scan plus asymptotics. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24922 v1 pith:4MHVKEMB submitted 2026-07-27 hep-th

Unitary Dual-Resonance S-matrices

Claudia de Rham , Andrew J. Tolley , Zhuo-Hui Wang , Shuang-Yong Zhou This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords dual resonanceS-matrix unitarityVeneziano amplitudeRegge slopescrossing symmetrypartial-wave unitaritysecond-sheet resonancesanalytic S-matrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Tree-level dual-resonance models such as the Veneziano amplitude package crossing symmetry, Regge behavior, and infinite resonance towers in one analytic expression, but they are not fully unitary because their absorptive parts sit only on zero-width poles. This paper constructs explicit four-scalar amplitudes by integrating Veneziano blocks against a continuous weight over Regge slopes, turning those poles into physical branch cuts while keeping channel duality and Regge organization. Suitable weights produce local, maximally analytic S-matrices that satisfy partial-wave unitarity, with optional second-sheet Regge trajectories or purely nonresonant absorptive backgrounds and substantial inelasticity. The unitarization is not worldsheet loops and not standard eikonalization. The construction gives a concrete handle on spectral distributions over Regge slopes as the data of consistent strongly coupled dual S-matrices.

Core claim

There exist explicit smearing weights such that the integral of triple-crossing-symmetric Veneziano kernels over Regge slopes from a lower cutoff upward defines fully unitary, local, maximally analytic dual-resonance four-scalar amplitudes in ten dimensions. Singularities of the weight control second-sheet resonance trajectories; holomorphic weights give nonresonant absorptive backgrounds; the large-slope tail is fixed by unitarity near threshold and at high spin.

What carries the argument

Regge-slope smearing: M(s,t) equals the integral from α' to infinity of φ(y) times the sum of three crossed Veneziano blocks. The weight φ converts zero-width pole towers into absorptive cuts, upgrades Regge poles to Regge cuts, and supplies the spectral data that enforce unitarity, locality, and controllable second-sheet poles via contour pinches.

Load-bearing premise

That checking unitarity in the main asymptotic regimes plus a finite numerical scan of partial waves for one explicit weight is enough to guarantee partial-wave unitarity at every energy and spin.

What would settle it

Compute the unitarity ratio Q_ℓ(s) = |a_ℓ(s)|² / (2 Im a_ℓ(s)) for the stated D=10 weight (β=3, p=2, y0=2α', Γ=3α'/5) on a dense grid of physical s and even ℓ; any point with Q_ℓ(s) > 1 falsifies full unitarity of that model.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Dual-resonance structure need not be tied to discrete zero-width towers; smooth spectral densities over Regge slopes can define consistent S-matrices.
  • Second-sheet resonance patterns and inelasticity can be dialed by choosing poles versus holomorphic pieces in the smearing weight.
  • Regge poles of fixed-slope Veneziano kernels become Regge cuts whose type is set by the weight near the lower slope cutoff.
  • The same smearing data can seed a bootstrap that classifies crossing-symmetric, local, unitary dual amplitudes with strong inelasticity beyond string perturbation theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying the lower slope cutoff and the weight’s endpoint behavior offers a systematic catalog of allowed Regge-cut structures in the complex angular-momentum plane.
  • Combining resonant and nonresonant weights may map a continuous family of inelasticity–coupling tradeoffs useful for comparing dual models to hadronic or strongly coupled data.
  • Extending the construction beyond identical massless scalars (massive external states, internal symmetries, other dimensions) would test how universal the large-slope unitarity constraints are.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The authors construct four-scalar S-matrices by smearing the triple-crossing-symmetric Veneziano combination W_y = V_y(s,t)+V_y(u,t)+V_y(s,u) over a continuous Regge slope, M(s,t) = ∫_{α'}^∞ dy φ(y) W_y (Eq. (3)), with weight functions of the form φ(y) ∝ (1−α'/y)^β (y/α')^{−p} times a Lorentzian factor with a complex pole at y = y_0 + iΓ (Eq. (4)). The smearing converts the zero-width pole towers into absorptive cuts. The paper argues that for 1 < p ≤ 2, β > 0 the resulting amplitudes satisfy full partial-wave unitarity, locality (polynomial boundedness at fixed t<0), and Mandelstam maximal analyticity, with second-sheet resonance poles at s_n = n/(y_0+iΓ) (Eq. (5)) arising as y-contour pinches. Unitarity is constrained analytically in three asymptotic regimes (threshold, App. B, giving p≤2 in D=10; large-s/large-b, App. C, p≤3; finite-s/large-ℓ, App. D, p≤3) and checked numerically for one explicit D=10 model (β=3, p=2, y_0=2α', Γ=3α'/5, C=1.84×10^7) via a scan of Q_ℓ(s) = |a_ℓ|²/(2 Im a_ℓ) in Fig. 2. Maximal analyticity is proven for the Veneziano block in the main text via an Euler-Beta germ plus Landau analysis, and for the Virasoro-Shapiro-like background block (Eq. (14)) in Appendix F through an elaborate complexified-worldsheet contour/Morse-flow argument. Nonresonant absorptive backgrounds (Eq. (13)) and enhanced inelasticity are also discussed.

Significance. If the unitarity claim holds, this is the first explicit class of S-matrices simultaneously realizing full partial-wave unitarity, triple crossing symmetry, maximal analyticity, locality, and a dual-resonance spectrum with Regge-organized second-sheet poles — without appealing to worldsheet loops or eikonal resummation. This is a genuinely new unitarization mechanism and would provide valuable boundary points and spectral data for the S-matrix bootstrap, as the Discussion outlines. The analytic parts of the paper are strong: the asymptotic unitarity constraints (Apps. B–D) are derived, not fitted; the maximal-analyticity proofs (main text and especially the App. F treatment of the VS-like block, including the π_1 ≅ Z monodromy check and the gradient-flow contour construction) are detailed and, as far as I can verify, correct; the resonance positions (Eq. (5)) and Regge-cut structure (Eq. (8)) are explicit, falsifiable outputs; and Appendix A cleanly shows why finite-range smearing cannot work. The construction is also non-circular: the amplitude is built from a stated ansatz and unitarity is checked a posteriori rather than assumed. The weak link, detailed below, is that the load-b

major comments (3)
  1. [Preserving Full Unitarity; Fig. 2] §'Preserving Full Unitarity' and Fig. 2: the headline claim that M(s,t) is 'fully unitary' — Q_ℓ(s) ≤ 1 for all s>0 and all even ℓ — rests on (i) asymptotic analyses and (ii) a numerical scan of a single parameter point whose normalization C = 1.84×10^7 is explicitly 'chosen to approximately saturate partial-wave unitarity for the most constraining partial wave' near s ≈ 1.8/α'. Three gaps follow. (a) The (s, ℓ) sampling of Fig. 2 is not specified (ranges, spacings, ℓ_max); since the model sits at the boundary by construction, a narrow overshoot of Q_0 between sampled points would reverse the claim, and no interpolation bound or derivative control is offered. (b) The text states the double-exponential quadrature's precision is 'sensitive to the distance between the poles and the integration contour'; the pole-to-contour distance varies with s precisely in the region where the scan is mos
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (17)–(19); Appendix C, Eq. (28)] The exhibited model sits at the boundary p = 2 of the threshold constraint of App. B. That appendix derives p ≤ (D−6)/2 from exponents alone: Re a_ℓ ∼ s^{−1+(D−4)/2} (Eq. (17)) versus Im a_ℓ ∼ s^{p−1+(D−4)/2} (Eq. (18)). At p = 2 in D = 10 both sides of |a_0|² ≤ 2 Im a_0 scale as s⁴, so the inequality becomes a statement about coefficients, i.e., about a ratio of moments of φ, which is never evaluated. Since the only fully presented model is exactly this marginal case, the coefficient-level check should be carried out in closed form (the threshold limit of Q_0(s→0⁺) is computable directly from Eqs. (16)–(18)); if it fails, p = 2 is excluded and the model's parameter point must move. Relatedly, the crossover argument in App. C ('if unitarity is satisfied at finite s, we expect it to hold also at large s', after Eq. (28)) is heuristic: the 1/(s log^{d/2−2} s) decrease only sets in asymptot
  3. ['Dual models without resonances' and 'Enhanced inelasticity'; Eqs. (13)–(14); Fig. 3] The abstract and Discussion claim a 'wide family' of fully unitary amplitudes obtained by varying φ and by adding the absorptive backgrounds of Eqs. (13)–(14). However, the finite-energy unitarity evidence is presented for exactly one point of the resonant family (Fig. 2). For the φ_B model of Eq. (13) the text asserts 'it can be shown that the amplitude remains unitary at finite s and ℓ' with no scan or proof displayed, and for the combined resonant + VS-like-background model (Eq. (14), Fig. 3 right) only |S_0| is plotted; the higher partial waves that were most constraining in Apps. C–D are not shown, and the allowed upper bound on C_B is not quantified. Since the coupling-enhanced model is motivated precisely by pushing closer to the unitarity boundary, it inherits the saturation problem of comment 1 in an acute form. Either present the corresponding Q_ℓ(s) scans (with the same error
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (6)] Eq. (6) displays the partial-wave projection with a factor printed as s^{(4−D)/2}, while the threshold analysis (Eq. (17)) and dimensional consistency of a dimensionless a_ℓ with the dimensionless Veneziano kernel require the opposite power. Please double-check the printed exponent and state the precise convention relating S_ℓ = 1 + i a_ℓ to M, since all of Apps. B–D inherit their s-power counting from it.
  2. [Eqs. (8)–(9)] Below Eq. (9) the logarithmic correction is described as a '(β+2)-Reggeon branch cut', whereas Eq. (8) and Eq. (9) give a cut of the form (ℓ−α't)^β log(ℓ−α't); please reconcile the terminology.
  3. [Footnote 3] Footnote 3 states that the √n growth of the widths 'is consistent with the Froissart bound as checked explicitly', but the check is not shown anywhere; a one-line estimate or a pointer to [72] would suffice.
  4. [Figs. 2–3] Fig. 2's caption should state the sampled s-range, ℓ-range, and spacings (see major comment 1). In Fig. 3 the left-panel legend appears to list Γ = 2α'/5 twice, and the right panel lacks any legend identifying which curve includes the background; please fix.
  5. [After Eq. (6)] The claim following Eq. (4) that the Veneziano kernel has positive partial-wave residues for D ≤ 10 (used to infer Im a_ℓ > 0) is load-bearing for reducing the check to Q_ℓ ≤ 1; a reference or short derivation should be given.
  6. [Introduction; [72]] The D = 4 phenomenology and the higher-spin/internal-symmetry extensions are repeatedly deferred to the companion [72] ('to appear'). The Letter is largely self-contained, but where results are imported (e.g., positivity of residues, Froissart check) the dependence should be made explicit so the present paper's logical status does not hinge on unavailable material.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: unitary dual amplitudes are constructed from Veneziano kernels plus postulated smearing weights, then checked for unitarity, analyticity, and locality.

full rationale

The central object M(s,t)=∫_{α'}^∞ dy φ(y) W_y is defined by smearing known triple-crossing Veneziano blocks with an explicit weight family φ(y). Full partial-wave unitarity, locality, and maximal analyticity are not built into that definition; they are imposed as constraints on the large-y tail of φ (threshold, Regge, and large-ℓ analyses in Apps. B–D) and then verified for an explicit parameter point by partial-wave projection and a numerical scan of Q_ℓ(s), plus independent Landau/contour arguments for analyticity and polynomial boundedness. Choosing the overall constant C so that the most constraining wave approximately saturates |a|²≤2 Im a is a free normalization of coupling strength, not a fit of data that forces the unitarity inequality by construction—the inequality can still fail at other (s,ℓ) and is checked rather than assumed. The only same-author citation of note is the companion “to appear” paper [72] on other dimensions and variants; it is not used as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise for the D=10 claims in this Letter. There is no self-definitional loop, no fitted empirical input renamed as a prediction, and no renaming of a known result as a derivation. Incomplete global proof of Q_ℓ≤1 everywhere is a correctness/completeness issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard S-matrix axioms plus the classical Veneziano kernel, a postulated family of smearing weights with several free parameters tuned for convergence and near-saturation of unitarity, and the inference that sampled plus asymptotic partial-wave checks imply full unitarity. No new particles are introduced; the new entity is the smeared dual amplitude class itself.

free parameters (6)
  • C (overall weight normalization) = 1.84e7 (explicit model)
    Dimensionless positive constant in φ(y); set to C=1.84×10^7 to approximately saturate the most constraining partial wave near s≈1.8/α'.
  • β (threshold exponent of φ near y=α') = 3 (explicit model)
    Controls convergence when Veneziano poles hit the lower integration limit and shapes the Regge-cut softness; chosen β=3 in the explicit model (required β>0).
  • p (large-y power of φ) = 2 (explicit model)
    Fixed in 1<p≤2 by integration convergence and threshold partial-wave unitarity; explicit model uses p=2.
  • y0, Γ (complex pole of resonant weight) = y0=2α', Γ=3α'/5
    Locate second-sheet resonance towers via pinch singularities; explicit choice y0=2α', Γ=3α'/5.
  • α' (lower cutoff / reference slope) = scale-setting input
    Sets the maximum string tension scale in the spectral distribution and overall energy units; an input scale, not predicted.
  • C_B and form of absorptive VS-like background = ẽφ_B ∝ (1-α'/y)^3 (y/α')^{-1} (explicit)
    Optional background weight ẽφ_B and prefactor chosen to enlarge Im a_0 near s=3/(2α') and enhance inelasticity; hand-designed.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Full partial-wave unitarity |1+i a_ℓ|≤1 (equivalently 0≤|a_ℓ|^2/(2 Im a_ℓ)≤1) is the correctness criterion for the four-point S-matrix.
    Stated as the paper’s notion of full unitarity throughout; standard S-matrix principle.
  • domain assumption Veneziano block V_y and the triple-crossing sum W_y encode channel duality, Regge behavior, and (for D≤10) positive partial-wave residues for massless scalar exchange.
    Seed amplitudes taken from dual-resonance literature; positivity used to guarantee Im a_ℓ>0 for positive φ.
  • domain assumption Mandelstam maximal analyticity: only physical cuts s,t,u∈[0,∞) on the first sheet, plus locality as polynomial boundedness at fixed t<0.
    Target properties proved/argued for the smeared amplitude in the main text and Appendices E–F.
  • standard math Standard complex analysis tools: contour deformation, Landau pinch equations, Laplace/Euler-Beta representations, Stirling asymptotics, unsubtracted fixed-t dispersion relations.
    Used for analytic continuation, locality, and dispersion checks.
  • ad hoc to paper Infinite-range smearing with φ(y)∼y^{-p}(1-α'/y)^β times optional Lorentzian (or holomorphic) factors is an allowed ansatz for a physical spectral density over Regge slopes.
    Core modeling choice of the Letter; justified by convergence and unitarity constraints derived in-appendices, not derived from a microscopic UV theory.
invented entities (2)
  • Regge-slope-smeared unitary dual-resonance amplitude M=∫ dy φ(y) W_y no independent evidence
    purpose: Convert zero-width dual poles into absorptive cuts while preserving crossing/Regge organization and enabling controllable second-sheet trajectories.
    The paper’s central constructed object; not a new particle but a new amplitude class defined by the smearing measure.
  • Second-sheet resonance poles as y-contour pinches between Veneziano poles y=n/s and complex poles of φ no independent evidence
    purpose: Give a controllable resonance spectrum (e.g. s_n^{(ℓ)}=n/y0+iΓ) inherited from the seed angular structure.
    Mechanism internal to the construction; widths ∼√n at large n are checked against Froissart only within the model.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 30292 in / 4264 out tokens · 73889 ms · 2026-07-31T05:46:11.918323+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dual-resonance models realize crossing symmetry, Regge behavior and infinitely many resonances in a compact analytic form but their canonical tree-level realizations fall short of genuine S-matrix unitarity. Here we explicitly construct fully unitary dual-resonance amplitudes distinct from the conventional worldsheet construction. The zero-width resonance towers are promoted into a physical absorptive spectrum that retains their characteristic crossing and Regge organization, while unitarizing the amplitude through a mechanism distinct from standard eikonalization. The resulting S-matrices are also local and analytic, and can contain controllable second-sheet Regge trajectories as well as substantial inelasticity. More broadly, our construction opens up a new route to charting the space of consistent strongly coupled S-matrices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24922 by Andrew J. Tolley, Claudia de Rham, Shuang-Yong Zhou, Zhuo-Hui Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Left) Deformation of the y integration contour of amplitude (3), making numerical integration practical. (Right) Continuation through the cut 0 < s < 1/α′ , caus￾ing ϕ(y)’s pole to pinch with a Veneziano pole to generate second-sheet resonance poles. through the first cut connecting to the origin of the s plane, 0 < s < 1/α′ . As s is continued to the second Riemann sheet, the s-channel poles y = n/s move… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The left panel displays log10 Qℓ(s) for finite s and ℓ in the explicit model (4). Partial-wave unitarity is satisfied in all regions. The right panel shows the ℓ = 0 partial wave. We have chosen C = 1.84 × 107 , β = 3, p = 2, y0 = 2α ′ , and Γ = 3α ′ /5. partial-wave amplitudes with only Regge poles in the complex ℓ plane, which violates unitarity [75, 76]. The y integration smearing upgrades the Regge pol… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Left) S0 = 1 + ia0 for several values of Γ with β = 3, p = 2 (see Eq. (13) for absorptive background ϕB). (Right) Combining the dual-resonance amplitude (3) with the Virasoro-Shapiro-like absorptive background significantly en￾hances inelasticity/coupling strength. Virasoro-Shapiro-like absorptive background term, Z ∞ α′ dyϕeB(y) (s 2 + t 2 + u 2 ) Γ(−ys)Γ(−yt)Γ(−yu) Γ(1 + ys)Γ(1 + yt)Γ(1 + yu) , (14) wit… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Analytic continuation at −α ′ t = 1/4. The Top panel shows that, for the V(s, t) block, the contour rotation method agrees with the Abel-Pad´e method. The Bottom panel demonstrates the validity of the Abel-Pad´e continua￾tion method for V(s, u) with different Pad´e orders. V(s, u) block from the fixed-t dispersion relation V¯(s, u) =Z ∞ −t/2 dµ π  DiscsV¯(µ, −µ − t) µ − s + (s → u)  , (37) where the barr… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analytic Boundaries of Infinite-Spin-Tower Amplitudes from Hidden Zero

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    The exact analytic boundary of unitary infinite-spin-tower amplitudes is derived and shown to be maximal unless energy poles accumulate.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 49 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Veneziano, Construction of a crossing - symmetric, Regge behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories, Nuovo Cim

    G. Veneziano, Construction of a crossing - symmetric, Regge behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories, Nuovo Cim. A57, 190 (1968)

    1968

  2. [2]

    M. A. Virasoro, Alternative constructions of crossing- symmetric amplitudes with regge behavior, Phys. Rev. 177, 2309 (1969)

    1969

  3. [3]

    Lovelace, A novel application of Regge trajectories, Phys

    C. Lovelace, A novel application of Regge trajectories, Phys. Lett. B28, 264 (1968)

    1968

  4. [4]

    J. A. Shapiro, Narrow-resonance model with regge be- havior for pi pi scattering, Phys. Rev.179, 1345 (1969)

    1969

  5. [5]

    D. D. Coon, Quantization conditions for linear and non- linear trajectories, Phys. Rev.186, 1422 (1969)

    1969

  6. [6]

    Bardakci and H

    K. Bardakci and H. Ruegg, Reggeized resonance model for arbitrary production processes, Phys. Rev.181, 1884 (1969)

    1969

  7. [7]

    Koba and H

    Z. Koba and H. B. Nielsen, Reaction amplitude for n mesons: A Generalization of the Veneziano-Bardakci- Ruegg-Virasoro model, Nucl. Phys. B10, 633 (1969)

    1969

  8. [8]

    Kikkawa, B

    K. Kikkawa, B. Sakita, and M. A. Virasoro, Feynman-like diagrams compatible with duality. I: Planar diagrams, Phys. Rev.184, 1701 (1969)

    1969

  9. [9]

    Martin, Smoothing veneziano, Phys

    A. Martin, Smoothing veneziano, Phys. Lett. B29, 431 (1969)

    1969

  10. [10]

    N. F. Bali, D. D. Coon, and J. W. Dash, Unstable parti- cles, two-body inelastic unitarity, and veneziano’s model, Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 900 (1969)

    1969

  11. [11]

    Huang, Unitarization of the veneziano model, pomer- anchuk singularity, and the pion mass, Phys

    K. Huang, Unitarization of the veneziano model, pomer- anchuk singularity, and the pion mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 903 (1969)

    1969

  12. [12]

    De Alfaro, S

    V. De Alfaro, S. Fubini, G. Rossetti, and G. Furlan, Sum rules for strong interactions, Phys. Lett.21, 576 (1966)

    1966

  13. [13]

    Igi and S

    K. Igi and S. Matsuda, New Sum Rules and Singularities in the Complex J Plane, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 625 (1967)

    1967

  14. [14]

    A. A. Logunov, L. D. Soloviev, and A. N. Tavkhelidze, Dispersion sum rules and high-energy scattering, Phys. Lett. B24, 181 (1967)

    1967

  15. [15]

    Dolen, D

    R. Dolen, D. Horn, and C. Schmid, Prediction of Regge Parameters of rho Poles from Low-Energy pi N Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 402 (1967)

    1967

  16. [16]

    Dolen, D

    R. Dolen, D. Horn, and C. Schmid, Finite energy sum rules and their application to pi N charge exchange, Phys. Rev.166, 1768 (1968)

    1968

  17. [17]

    Ademollo, H

    M. Ademollo, H. R. Rubinstein, G. Veneziano, and M. A. Virasoro, Bootstraplike Conditions from Superconver- gence, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1402 (1967)

    1967

  18. [18]

    Mandelstam, Dynamics Based on Rising Regge Tra- jectories, Phys

    S. Mandelstam, Dynamics Based on Rising Regge Tra- jectories, Phys. Rev.166, 1539 (1968)

    1968

  19. [19]

    G. F. Chew and A. Pignotti, Dolen-Horn-Schmid Duality and the Deck Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1078 (1968)

    1968

  20. [20]

    Schmid, Meson Bootstrap with Finite-Energy Sum Rules, Phys

    C. Schmid, Meson Bootstrap with Finite-Energy Sum Rules, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 628 (1968)

    1968

  21. [21]

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS, JHEP11, 133, arXiv:1607.06109 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part III: higher dimensional amplitudes, JHEP12, 040, arXiv:1708.06765 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 081702 (2017), arXiv:1702.06134 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, New positiv- ity bounds from full crossing symmetry, JHEP05, 255, arXiv:2011.02400 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Caron-Huot and V

    S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong, Extremal Effective Field Theories, JHEP05, 280, arXiv:2011.02957 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Arkani-Hamed, T.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, The EFT-Hedron, JHEP05, 259, arXiv:2012.15849 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Bellazzini, J

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Mir´ o, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau, and F. Riva, Positive moments for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104, 036006 (2021), arXiv:2011.00037 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Hebbar, D

    A. Hebbar, D. Karateev, and J. Penedones, Spinning S- matrix bootstrap in 4d, JHEP01, 060, arXiv:2011.11708 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    Sinha and A

    A. Sinha and A. Zahed, Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations in Quantum Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 181601 (2021), arXiv:2012.04877 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, Flavor Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 081601 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 149901 (2021)], arXiv:2004.02885 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Zhang and S.-Y

    C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex Geometry Perspective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 201601 (2020), arXiv:2005.03047 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    X. Li, H. Xu, C. Yang, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Pos- itivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 121601 (2021), arXiv:2101.01191 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, Sharp boundaries for the swampland, JHEP07, 110, arXiv:2102.08951 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Chiang, Y.-t

    L.-Y. Chiang, Y.-t. Huang, W. Li, L. Rodina, and H.-C. Weng, Into the EFThedron and UV constraints from IR consistency, JHEP03, 063, arXiv:2105.02862 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Guerrieri, J

    A. Guerrieri, J. Penedones, and P. Vieira, Where Is String Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 081601 (2021), arXiv:2102.02847 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Alberte, C

    L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly, and A. J. Tolley, Re- 7 verse Bootstrapping: IR Lessons for UV Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 051602 (2022), arXiv:2111.09226 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    H¨ aring and A

    K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov, Gravitational Regge bounds, SciPost Phys.16, 034 (2024), arXiv:2202.08280 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Huang and G

    Y.-t. Huang and G. N. Remmen, UV-complete gravity amplitudes and the triple product, Phys. Rev. D106, L021902 (2022), arXiv:2203.00696 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Henriksson, B

    J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, Bounding violations of the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP08, 184, arXiv:2203.08164 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Antunes, M

    A. Antunes, M. S. Costa, and J. Pereira, Exploring in- elasticity in the S-matrix Bootstrap, Phys. Lett. B846, 138225 (2023), arXiv:2301.13219 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    H¨ aring and A

    K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov, The stringy S-matrix bootstrap: maximal spin and superpolynomial softness, JHEP10, 075, arXiv:2311.13631 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Cheung and G

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Bespoke dual resonance, Phys. Rev. D108, 086009 (2023), arXiv:2308.03833 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Geiser, The Baker-Coon-Romans N-point amplitude and an exact field theory limit of the Coon amplitude, JHEP10, 010, arXiv:2311.04130 [hep-th]

    N. Geiser, The Baker-Coon-Romans N-point amplitude and an exact field theory limit of the Coon amplitude, JHEP10, 010, arXiv:2311.04130 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Karateev, S

    D. Karateev, S. Kuhn, and J. Penedones, Bootstrap- ping Massive Quantum Field Theories, JHEP07, 035, arXiv:1912.08940 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  45. [45]

    He and M

    Y. He and M. Kruczenski, Bootstrapping gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 191601 (2024), arXiv:2309.12402 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Albert, J

    J. Albert, J. Henriksson, L. Rastelli, and A. Vichi, Boot- strapping mesons at large N: Regge trajectory from spin- two maximization, JHEP09, 172, arXiv:2312.15013 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    F. Bhat, D. Chowdhury, A. P. Saha, and A. Sinha, Boot- strapping string models with entanglement minimization and machine learning, Phys. Rev. D111, 066013 (2025), arXiv:2409.18259 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Caron-Huot and Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-Z. Li, Gravity and a universal cut- off for field theory, JHEP02, 115, arXiv:2408.06440 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Cheung, A

    C. Cheung, A. Hillman, and G. N. Remmen, Bootstrap Principle for the Spectrum and Scattering of Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251601 (2024), arXiv:2406.02665 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Eckner, F

    C. Eckner, F. Figueroa, and P. Tourkine, Regge boot- strap: From linear to nonlinear trajectories, Phys. Rev. D111, 126005 (2025), arXiv:2401.08736 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Guerrieri, A

    A. Guerrieri, A. Homrich, and P. Vieira, Multiparticle Flux-Tube S-matrix Bootstrap, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 041601 (2025), arXiv:2404.10812 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Guerrieri, K

    A. Guerrieri, K. H¨ aring, and N. Su, From data to the ana- lytic S-matrix: A Bootstrap fit of the pion scattering am- plitude, SciPost Phys.20, 034 (2026), arXiv:2410.23333 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Wan and S.-Y

    S.-L. Wan and S.-Y. Zhou, Matrix moment approach to positivity bounds and UV reconstruction from IR, JHEP 02, 168, arXiv:2411.11964 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    A. P. Saha and A. Sinha, Field Theory Expansions of String Theory Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 221601 (2024), arXiv:2401.05733 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Bellazzini, J

    B. Bellazzini, J. Berman, G. Isabella, F. Riva, M. Ro- mano, and F. Sciotti, Positivity with Long-Range Inter- actions (2025), arXiv:2512.13780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Berman, H

    J. Berman, H. Elvang, and C. Figueiredo, Splitting re- gions and shrinking islands from higher point constraints, JHEP10, 226, arXiv:2506.22538 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Cheung and G

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Multipositivity bounds for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D112, 016017 (2025), arXiv:2505.05553 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Correia and C

    M. Correia and C. Pasiecznik, Resonances: Uni- versality and Factorization on Higher Sheets (2025), arXiv:2512.13775 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Correia, A

    M. Correia, A. Georgoudis, and A. L. Guerrieri, Cross- Section Bootstrap: Unveiling the Froissart Amplitude (2025), arXiv:2506.04313 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    He and M

    Y. He and M. Kruczenski, The Gauge Theory Boot- strap: Predicting Pion Dynamics from QCD, PTEP 2026, 063B05 (2026), arXiv:2505.19332 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    de Rham, A

    C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Primal S-matrix bootstrap with dispersion relations, JHEP01, 027, arXiv:2506.22546 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    L. F. Alday, E. Armanini, K. H¨ aring, and A. Zhiboe- dov, From Partons to Strings: Scattering on the Coulomb Branch ofN= 4 SYM (2025), arXiv:2510.19909 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Elvang, A

    H. Elvang, A. Herderschee, and R. Morales, String theory from maximal supersymmetry, JHEP07, 105, arXiv:2601.11705 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Chang, Z.-Y

    F.-M. Chang, Z.-Y. Chen, and S.-Y. Zhou, Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT (2026), arXiv:2604.00107 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Calisto, C

    F. Calisto, C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, F. Sciotti, and M. Tarquini, The Equivalence Principle at High Energies Completes the Spectrum (2026), arXiv:2605.20319 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Jeong, P. Ko, A. Pomarol, G. N. Remmen, and F. Sciotti, Multipositivity Constrains the Chiral La- grangian (2026), arXiv:2605.21582 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Elias Miro, A

    J. Elias Miro, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gumus, The Phases of the Scalar S-Matrix Island (2026), arXiv:2605.06613 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Wan and S.-Y

    S.-L. Wan and S.-Y. Zhou, Analytic Bootstrap of the Veneziano Amplitude (2026), arXiv:2605.11084 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  69. [69]

    M. A. Gumus, D. Leflot, P. Tourkine, and A. Zhiboe- dov, Neural S-matrix bootstrap II: solvable 4d ampli- tudes with particle production (2026), arXiv:2601.22145 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Boisvert, W

    M. Boisvert, W. Knop, and L. Rastelli, Where is tree- level heterotic string theory? (2026), arXiv:2606.09980 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Berman, S

    J. Berman, S. Caron-Huot, A. V. Chandra, H. Elvang, A. Herderschee, L. L. Lin, and R. Morales, Gravitational Effective Theories with Maximal Supersymmetry and a Peculiar Parity (2026), arXiv:2607.14230 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    de Rham, A

    C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Unitary dual-resonance models, to appear

  73. [73]

    Eberhardt and S

    L. Eberhardt and S. Mizera, Unitarity cuts of the world- sheet, SciPost Phys.14, 015 (2023), arXiv:2208.12233 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Banerjee, L

    P. Banerjee, L. Eberhardt, and S. Mizera, Regge limit of one-loop string amplitudes, SciPost Phys.19, 052 (2025), arXiv:2403.07064 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Amati, A

    D. Amati, A. Stanghellini, and S. Fubini, Theory of high- energy scattering and multiple production, Nuovo Cim. 26, 896 (1962)

    1962

  76. [76]

    Mandelstam, Cuts in the Angular Momentum Plane

    S. Mandelstam, Cuts in the Angular Momentum Plane. 2, Nuovo Cim.30, 1148 (1963). 8 A. Unitarity violation in finitely smeared amplitudes In the main text, we pointed out that a finite-range smearing [9] of the form M(s, t) = Z ymax α′ dy ϕ(y)Wy(s, t, u) (15) necessarily leads to unitarity violation in the high-spin partial waves. To see this, let us exami...

    1963