Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A cheap tilt-seeded supercell recipe finds the low-energy phases of ABO3 perovskites that cubic models miss.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 20:06 UTC pith:LQHPLJCD

load-bearing objection Solid, useful DFT mapping of tilt vs B-site distortions and a cheap protocol that works inside its stated 15-oxide slice—not yet proven as general infrastructure. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28025 v1 pith:LQHPLJCD submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Mapping the influence of symmetry breaking in structure-property relationships of ABO₃ perovskites

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ABO3 perovskitesoctahedral tiltingGlazer notationGoldschmidt tolerance factorsymmetry breakingstructure-property relationshipssupercell templateshigh-throughput structure search
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Most ABO3 perovskites under ordinary conditions are not the ideal cubic crystals that dominate computer databases. They lower their energy by tilting oxygen octahedra and shifting B-site cations, and those distortions change stability, band gaps, and stiffness. This paper maps that landscape for 15 non-magnetic oxides spanning a wide range of Goldschmidt tolerance factors. It shows that the energy gain from distortion is large when the tolerance factor is low and shrinks toward the cubic limit as the factor rises, with collective octahedral tilts dominating at low tolerance factor and B-site off-centering taking over at high tolerance factor. From that map the authors extract a practical recipe: start from a √2×√2×2-class cell, seed a +−− (Pnma-like) tilt whose amplitude tracks the tolerance factor, add small random A/B displacements, and relax. Across all fifteen compositions that protocol recovers the lowest or equal-lowest energies among the templates they tried, at a fraction of the cost of large random supercell searches.

Core claim

Composition-dependent low-symmetry stabilization in these ABO3 oxides is systematically captured by Glazer/standard templates and unconstrained supercells; a computationally inexpensive protocol that seeds an even-parity √2×√2×2-class cell with a tolerance-factor-parameterized +−− octahedral tilt plus small random cation displacements yields the lowest (or equal-lowest) energies relative to cubic for every composition tested, with tilts driving stabilization at low tG and B-site off-centering at high tG.

What carries the argument

The optimisation protocol: a tG→θ_tilt linear seed of the +−− (one in-phase, two out-of-phase) Glazer pattern on a √2×√2×2-class even-parity supercell, plus small random A/B displacements, followed by unconstrained relaxation. That construction is what turns the template survey into a cheap generator of thermodynamically relevant low-symmetry models.

Load-bearing premise

The recipe—linear tilt from the tolerance factor, one preferred +−− pattern, and even-parity √2×√2×2-class cells—trained on three prototypes inside a magnetism-free fifteen-compound set at zero-kelvin PBE, is assumed to transfer as a general generator of the important low-symmetry phases.

What would settle it

Apply the same protocol to a perovskite outside the trained chemistry or with magnetic B-sites (or known non-Pnma ground states) and check whether the relaxed energy still matches or beats careful Glazer and large-supercell benchmarks; a clear miss would falsify transferability.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • High-throughput perovskite screens can replace default cubic cells with this tilt-seeded recipe and recover ambient-relevant low-symmetry models at modest cost.
  • Open materials databases can be enriched with energetically competitive low-symmetry ABO3 entries instead of remaining biased toward ideal cubic phases.
  • Property estimates (band gap, bulk modulus) should be reported on the protocol’s low-energy phase, not only on cubic, because symmetry lowering systematically shifts both.
  • Supercell shape and parity matter as much as random starts: even-parity √2-based cells are the efficient choice when tilt-driven ground states are expected.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tG-conditioned seed could be the missing diversity needed to train universal machine-learning potentials that currently fail on low-symmetry perovskites for lack of distorted training data.
  • Extending the protocol with anharmonic free energies, rather than harmonic ones, is the natural next test for compositions near tG≈1 where the paper already notes flat, competing landscapes.
  • If the +−− prior is too strong, a small menu of Glazer seeds (not only +−−) chosen by tG band would be a direct, still-cheap upgrade for multinary or magnetic chemistries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript systematically maps how octahedral tilting and B-site off-centering stabilize low-symmetry ABO3 perovskite phases relative to cubic Pm-3m. Using 15 non-magnetic compositions (A = Ca, Sr, Ba; B = Ti, Zr, Hf, Sn, Nb), the authors compare Glazer/standard symmetry-constrained templates with unconstrained supercell and “distorted” templates, quantify energies and structural descriptors versus Goldschmidt tG, and examine supercell shape/size/parity effects (especially on CaZrO3, SrTiO3, BaTiO3). They report that low-tG systems are tilt-driven with Pnma / a+b−b− (+−−) as the typical 0 K ground state, while high-tG systems favor weaker tilts and B-site off-centering; even-parity √2×√2×2-class cells best recover low-energy tilt networks. From these trends they propose a cheap initialization protocol (tG-parameterized +−− tilt on a √2×√2×2-class cell plus small random A/B displacements) that, after relaxation, matches or beats other templates for all 15 compounds, and they report accompanying trends in Eg, B0, and harmonic free energies.

Significance. The work addresses a genuine practical bottleneck: open databases and high-throughput studies remain biased toward ideal cubic cells, while ambient perovskite physics is often low-symmetry. The breadth of consistent PBE relaxations (Glazer heatmaps, standard-template ΔE(tG) trends, ~300 supercell starts on prototypes, descriptor–energy maps, and Fig. 11 protocol benchmarks) is a real strength and yields actionable guidance on supercell parity and the primacy of +−−/Pnma for this chemistry class. If the protocol and template lessons hold under the stated scope, they provide a useful, low-cost starting point for enriching structure searches and training sets. The contribution is methodological and cartographic rather than a new physical mechanism; its value depends on clear scoping of transferability beyond the magnetism-free A/B set used to build it.

major comments (3)
  1. [Optimisation Protocol and Validation; Fig. 11; Conclusion] Optimisation Protocol and Validation / Fig. 11(c): The central claim that the protocol is a “robust,” “general,” and transferable generator of thermodynamically relevant low-symmetry phases is only demonstrated inside the same 15-compound, non-magnetic PBE set used to select +−−, fit the tG→θ_tilt initializer (Fig. 11a; SI eq. S12), and choose even-parity √2×√2×2-class cells from CaZrO3/SrTiO3/BaTiO3 sampling. No held-out composition, magnetic/Jahn–Teller B-site, or alternative functional is shown. The authors already note that a+b−c− collapses to Pnma here but can be stable elsewhere (e.g. SrRuO3). Either validate on compositions outside this slice or substantially temper “general/robust infrastructure” language to “efficient recipe for this non-magnetic oxide family.”
  2. [Influence of Temperature on Thermodynamic Ranking; Fig. 9] Influence of Temperature on Thermodynamic Ranking / Fig. 9: Harmonic DFPT free energies are used to discuss phase stability and transitions, yet the text itself reports large quantitative failures (SrTiO3: cubic lowest to ~800 K vs experimental I4/mcm→cubic at 105 K; BaTiO3: crossover ~880 K vs ~398 K) and invokes known anharmonicity. Load-bearing statements that CaZrO3 has “no temperature-driven phase transition up to 2000 K,” or that the profiles give a “coherent picture” of competing distortions versus T, should be reframed as qualitative 0 K-plus-harmonic trends only, with transition temperatures not interpreted as predictions without anharmonic treatment or stronger experimental anchoring.
  3. [Physical Properties; Fig. 10] Physical Properties / Fig. 10 and Tables S8–S14: Eg and B0 are reported as HOMO–LUMO gaps and bulk moduli across many templates, but the discussion mixes Glazer-only trends with “distorted templates” that also embed random A/B shifts, and metallic ANbO3 are dropped from the Eg violin without a parallel structure–property analysis. The claim that distortions that minimize energy “simultaneously also govern” electronic and mechanical response in a tG-dependent way is plausible but not tightly supported: there is no decomposition separating tilt amplitude from B-site chemistry/orbital character, and PBE gaps are used without hybrid/GW checks even for qualitative ordering. Tighten claims to “template-to-template spread under PBE” or add a minimal orbital/band-edge analysis for the Ti/Sn outliers highlighted in the text.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Selected Composition; Fig. 1] Selected Composition / Fig. 1: State explicitly that tG uses Shannon radii and fixed oxidation states, and note sensitivity (or lack thereof) when alternative tolerance factors are used—only briefly mentioned as “similar trends.”
  2. [Supercell Templates; Fig. 3] Supercell Templates: The Valle–Oganov selection of 20 of 5000 starts per amplitude is reasonable but underspecified in the main text (fingerprint cutoff, diversity metric). A short main-text sentence plus SI pointer would aid reproducibility.
  3. [Unconstrained Templates / Supercell Templates] Notation: Glazer superscripts are sometimes written as +−− without axis letters and mixed with space-group labels; define the shorthand once when first used in the supercell section.
  4. [Thermodynamic Ranking; Figs. 4, 8] Fig. 4(b) heatmap and Fig. 8 landscapes are information-dense; ensure color scales and ΔE units are legible in grayscale and that “degenerate after relaxation” cases are flagged in the figure or caption.
  5. [Methods; throughout] Typos/style: “via the computed free energy ΔG(T)” while defining G(T)=EDFT+Fvib(T) (Helmholtz-like under harmonic, fixed-volume assumptions); “Ast G”, “withinin”, and occasional missing spaces around tG appear in the compiled text—proofread carefully.
  6. [Introduction; Optimisation Protocol] Related-method context: briefly position the protocol against soft-phonon following and existing low-symmetry generators (e.g. works cited as Xie et al., Zhao/Zunger polymorphous supercells) so readers see what is incremental versus complementary.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No construction-forced circularity: rankings and properties come from independent DFT total energies; only a mild same-set fit of the tG→θ_tilt initializer is reused inside the protocol.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Optimisation Protocol and Validation; Fig. 11(a–b); SI eq. S12]
    "The data in Fig. 11(a) provide the initial points used to parameterise a simple composition-dependent model tG → θ_tilt (Sec. S6 in SI), which predicts the starting octahedral rotation angle θ_tilt for a given composition. ... The initial tilt angle θ_tilt is set by a linear model as a function of tG (eq. (S12) in the SI)"

    The linear tG→θ_tilt relation is fit to the authors’ own relaxed tilt descriptors on the same composition set, then described as predicting the starting angle used by the protocol that is validated on that same set. This is only a mild initializer fit: final rankings are still set by independent DFT relaxation against other templates, not by equating the fit to the reported ΔE.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing quantities—relative energies ΔE, free energies ΔG(T), band gaps, bulk moduli, and Glazer/supercell tilt classifications—are obtained from external PBE-DFT (and DFPT) total-energy and property calculations on explicitly constructed templates, not from identities that equate outputs to inputs. Goldschmidt tG is computed from tabulated Shannon radii; Glazer/Stokes–Howard tilt catalogues and standard space groups are classical external crystallography; supercell sampling uses random displacements and Valle–Oganov selection followed by unconstrained relaxation. The only mild self-use is the linear tG→θ_tilt map (Fig. 11a; SI eq. S12), parameterized on post-relaxation descriptors of the same 15 (prototype-driven) compositions and then used solely to seed initial geometries that are fully re-relaxed; success is judged by post-relaxation ΔE against independent Glazer, standard, distorted, and supercell baselines (Fig. 11c), so the energy ranking is not statistically forced by the fit. Limited transfer beyond the magnetism-free A={Ca,Sr,Ba}×B={Ti,Zr,Hf,Sn,Nb} slice is a scope/generalization issue, not circularity. No self-citation uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of a known forced result carries the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The load-bearing story rests on standard perovskite crystallography and DFT practice, plus a few hand-chosen sampling knobs and a linear tilt initializer fit inside the study. No new physical particles or forces are postulated; 'templates' and the protocol are methodological constructs. Transfer beyond the magnetism-free ternary set and beyond harmonic free energies is assumed rather than proven.

free parameters (4)
  • Initial random displacement amplitudes = 0.2 Å / 1.0 Å (supercells); 0.5 Å (distorted templates)
    Fixed |Δr| = 0.2 Å and 1.0 Å for supercell sampling; 0.5 Å cation kicks in distorted templates; protocol uses 0.2 Å. Chosen by hand to set low/high distortion levels, not derived.
  • tG → θ_tilt linear initialization model = linear model (coefficients in SI eq. S12)
    Initial octahedral rotation angle for the protocol is set by a linear model in tG parameterized from relaxed prototype trends (eq. S12 / Fig. 11). Affects starting structures though not final DFT energies directly.
  • Supercell configuration subsample size = 20 per amplitude (10 for 2√2×2√2×4)
    5000 random configs reduced to 20 most distinct per amplitude via Valle–Oganov fingerprint (10 for largest cell). Selection count is a procedural free choice controlling coverage vs cost.
  • Third-order polynomial fits of ΔE vs tG = third-order polynomial (SI)
    Trend lines for orthorhombic/tetragonal templates vs tG (eq. S7) are descriptive fits to the computed points; not physical constants but shape the presented correlation narrative.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Goldschmidt tolerance factor tG from Shannon radii is a sufficient primary composition coordinate for ranking distortion propensity.
    Used to select and order the 15 compositions and to drive the protocol initializer (Selected Composition; Fig. 1; Protocol Step 1).
  • domain assumption The 15 Glazer/Stokes–Howard tilt systems plus a few standard phases adequately span symmetry-constrained perovskite distortion space for these ternaries.
    Symmetry-constrained exploration is limited to that catalog (Glazer Templates; Howard & Stokes).
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT with ONCV pseudopotentials ranks relative phase energies and qualitative property trends reliably enough for the claimed protocol validation.
    All energetics, gaps, and moduli rest on this stack (Methods).
  • domain assumption Quasi-harmonic (here harmonic DFPT+Phonopy) free energies suffice to discuss temperature ordering trends among the retained templates.
    Influence of Temperature section; authors note anharmonic failures for SrTiO3/BaTiO3 absolute Tc.
  • ad hoc to paper Excluding magnetic B-site order and restricting to listed A/B chemistries does not change the qualitative template and parity conclusions.
    Explicit selection criteria (a)–(c) in Selected Composition narrow the claim’s empirical base.
  • standard math Standard group–subgroup/Landau continuous vs first-order markings on Glazer diagrams are accepted background.
    Fig. 4(a) solid/dashed lines follow established crystallographic classification.
invented entities (2)
  • Symmetry-constrained vs unconstrained supercell template taxonomy (including 'distorted templates' suite) no independent evidence
    purpose: Organize the computational sampling campaign and compare distortion modes on equal footing.
    Methodological packaging of Glazer/standard cells, random supercells, and Dias-style single-mode distortions; not a new physical object. Independent use is as a workflow, not a measurable particle or field.
  • tG-seeded +−− √2×√2×2 optimisation protocol no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a cheap, composition-adaptive generator of low-symmetry starting structures for high-throughput exploration.
    Central methodological product; validated only inside this DFT study on 15 compositions. Falsifiable by failure on held-out chemistries, but no external experimental structure-prediction blind test is reported.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 30573 in / 4259 out tokens · 100673 ms · 2026-07-31T20:06:29.825516+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Perovskite oxides have emerged as an important class of material with promising energy applications owing to their compositional and structural flexibility, which enables stabilization of both low- and high-symmetry phases and gives rise to diverse physical properties. Under ambient conditions, most perovskites adopt low-symmetry structures characterized by octahedral tilting and B-site displacements. Despite their importance, computational studies have largely focused on the ideal cubic phase as modeling these distortions remains challenging. The difficulty stems from the absence of a quantitative framework capable of capturing composition-dependent distortions that can occur through multiple non-equivalent atomic displacement modes, often requiring computationally expensive large supercells to explore the structural landscape. Consequently, the influence of distortions on the stability and properties of low-symmetry perovskites remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we develop an efficient computational framework for the rapid construction and exploration of composition-dependent structural models across both low- and high-symmetry phases. Using $\textit{symmetry constrained templates}$ and $\textit{unconstrained supercell templates}$, we systematically investigate 15 representative compositions to uncover relationships between composition, supercell size and shape, and distortion patterns. Based on these insights, we propose a robust and computationally inexpensive protocol for rapid structural exploration and assess the influence of different distortion modes on key physical properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28025 by Assil Bouzid, Fabien Pascale, Olivier Masson, Panupol Untarabut, Samuel Bernard, Santanu Saha, S\'ebastien Leb\`egue, Sylvian Cadars.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Variation of Goldschmidt tolerance factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic illustration of BO6 octahedral rotation modes in perovskite structures. (a) Ideal cubic structure with no octahedral rotation. (b) In-phase rotation (IR), where two adjacent octahedron rotate in the same direction along the rotation axis. (c) Out-of-phase rotation (OR), where two adjacent octahedron rotate in opposite directions. Side views (top row) highlight the relative orientation along the r… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic workflow for generating distorted supercell structures for DFT calculations.(a) Displays [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Group–subgroup relationships of Glazer templates for CaZrO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Five distinct structural models of the ABO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of relative energies ∆E (meV/atom) for CaZrO3 across all supercell templates with respect to cubic phase. Colours indicate different octahedral rotation patterns obtained from post-relaxation symmetry analysis: grey (±, mixed rotation), blue (+ +−), green (+− −), red (− − −), and purple (0− −). (a) All supercell configurations; (b–d) simple integer supercells 2×2×2, 3×2×2, and 3×3×3; (e–g) rot… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Correlation between relaxed energy ∆E (meV/atom) with respect to the cubic phase and struc￾tural descriptors for CaZrO3 across different randomly distorted supercells. Each point corresponds to a relaxed structure, and the symbol indicates the supercell size. (a) Average tilting parameter ⟨sin(θtilt)⟩. (b) Average B-site cation off-centre displacement ∆rB (Å). (c) Average intra-octahedral order parameter ⟨… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Thermodynamic energy landscape for CaZrO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Temperature-dependent relative free energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Violin plots of the calculated (a) HOMO–LUMO gaps obtained with PBE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Tilt parameter ⟨sin(θtilt)⟩ and B-site off-centering ⟨∆rB⟩ plotted as a function of the tolerance factor tG for the 15 compositions. Dashed lines indicate the corresponding values before structural relaxation. (b) Workflow for generating initial low symmetry distorted perovskite structures for ab initio calculations. (c) Relative energies ∆E (meV/atom) of all compositions with respect to the cubic pha… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ordered-to-disordered transfer learning with graph neural networks for formation-energy and HOMO-LUMO gap prediction in high-entropy perovskite oxides

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Graph neural networks trained on ordered perovskites transfer well to high-entropy perovskites for formation energy but not HOMO-LUMO gap; a small amount of HEPO data restores gap accuracy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Zhu, Y.et al.Nanosized LaInO 3 perovskite for efficient electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate. J. CO2 Util.68, 102342 (2023)

  2. [2]

    Wu, T.et al.Recent progress on perovskite-based electrocatalysts for efficientCO2 reduction.Molecules 28, 8154 (2023)

  3. [3]

    Sci.15, 11166–11187 (2024)

    Xu, R.et al.Advancements and prospects of perovskite-based fuel electrodes in solid oxide cells for CO2 electrolysis to CO.Chem. Sci.15, 11166–11187 (2024)

  4. [4]

    C.et al.A highly active and stable IrO x/SrIrO3 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction

    Seitz, L. C.et al.A highly active and stable IrO x/SrIrO3 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Science353, 1011–1014 (2016)

  5. [5]

    J., Gasteiger, H

    Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Gasteiger, H. A., Goodenough, J. B. & Shao-Horn, Y. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles.Science334, 1383–1385 (2011)

  6. [6]

    E., Fabbri, E

    Beall, C. E., Fabbri, E. & Schmidt, T. J. Perovskite oxide based electrodes for the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions: the underlying mechanism.ACS Catalysis11, 3094–3114 (2021)

  7. [7]

    Hu, X.et al.Identifying electrocatalytic activity and mechanism of Ce1/3NbO3 perovskite for nitrogen reduction to ammonia at ambient conditions.Appl. Catal. B: Environ.280, 119419 (2021)

  8. [8]

    Xu, Y.et al.Perovskite ceramic oxide as an efficient electrocatalyst for nitrogen fixation.Int. J. Hydrogen Energy46, 10293–10302 (2021)

  9. [9]

    China Mater.65, 2711–2720 (2022)

    Chu, K.et al.High-entropy perovskite oxides: A versatile class of materials for nitrogen reduction reactions.Sci. China Mater.65, 2711–2720 (2022)

  10. [10]

    Hwang, J.et al.Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis.Science358, 751–756 (2017)

  11. [11]

    Acosta, M.et al.BaTiO 3-based piezoelectrics: Fundamentals, current status, and perspectives.Appl. Phys. Rev.4(2017)

  12. [12]

    Filip, M. R. & Giustino, F. The geometric blueprint of perovskites.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115, 5397– 5402 (2018)

  13. [13]

    J.et al.New tolerance factor to predict the stability of perovskite oxides and halides.Sci

    Bartel, C. J.et al.New tolerance factor to predict the stability of perovskite oxides and halides.Sci. Adv.5, eaav0693 (2019)

  14. [14]

    Emery, A. A. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput DFT calculations of formation energy, stability and oxygen vacancy formation energy of ABO3 perovskites.Sci. Data4, 1–10 (2017)

  15. [15]

    Bechtel, J. S. & Van der Ven, A. Octahedral tilting instabilities in inorganic halide perovskites.Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 025401 (2018). 25

  16. [16]

    M., Wang, Z

    Zhao, X.-G., Dalpian, G. M., Wang, Z. & Zunger, A. Polymorphous nature of cubic halide perovskites. Phys. Rev. B101, 155137 (2020)

  17. [17]

    Feng, Y.et al.Unraveling metastable perovskite oxides insights from structural engineering to synthesis paradigms.Microstructures5, N–A (2025)

  18. [18]

    A., Crace, E

    Matheu, R., Vigil, J. A., Crace, E. J. & Karunadasa, H. I. The halogen chemistry of halide perovskites. Trends Chem.4, 206–219 (2022)

  19. [19]

    Commun.16, 5438 (2025)

    Xu, C.et al.Improper antiferroelectricity in NaNbO 3-based perovskites driven by antiferrodistortive modulation.Nat. Commun.16, 5438 (2025)

  20. [20]

    Yoshida, S.et al.Ferroelectric Sr 3Zr2O7: competition between hybrid improper ferroelectric and anti- ferroelectric mechanisms.Adv. Func. Mater.28, 1801856 (2018)

  21. [21]

    & Zunger, A

    Varignon, J., Bibes, M. & Zunger, A. Origin of band gaps in 3 d perovskite oxides.Nat. Commun.10, 1658 (2019)

  22. [22]

    Goldschmidt, V. M. Die gesetze der krystallochemie.Naturwissenschaften14, 477–485 (1926)

  23. [23]

    Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides.Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr.32, 751–767 (1976)

  24. [24]

    Glazer, A. M. The classification of tilted octahedra in perovskites.Acta Cryst. B28, 3384–3392 (1972)

  25. [25]

    Howard, C. J. & Stokes, H. T. Group-theoretical analysis of octahedral tilting in perovskites.Acta Cryst. B54, 782–789 (1998)

  26. [26]

    T., Kisi, E

    Stokes, H. T., Kisi, E. H., Hatch, D. M. & Howard, C. J. Group-theoretical analysis of octahedral tilting in ferroelectric perovskites.Structural Science58, 934–938 (2002)

  27. [27]

    Alloys Compd.1024, 180113 (2025)

    Tang, Y.et al.Regulating catalytic activity with geometry distortion of Sr2FeMoO6 anode.J. Alloys Compd.1024, 180113 (2025)

  28. [28]

    R.Modern methods of crystal structure prediction(John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

    Oganov, A. R.Modern methods of crystal structure prediction(John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

  29. [29]

    Woodley, S. M. & Catlow, R. Crystal structure prediction from first principles.Nat. Mater.7, 937–946 (2008)

  30. [30]

    C.The art of molecular dynamics simulation(Cambridge university press, 2004)

    Rapaport, D. C.The art of molecular dynamics simulation(Cambridge university press, 2004)

  31. [31]

    Kühne, T. D. Second generation car–parrinello molecular dynamics.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci.4, 391–406 (2014)

  32. [32]

    Structural phases of SrHfO3.Solid State Commun.148, 29–31 (2008)

    Vali, R. Structural phases of SrHfO3.Solid State Commun.148, 29–31 (2008)

  33. [33]

    & Müller, K

    Axe, J., Shirane, G. & Müller, K. Zone-boundary phonon instability in cubic laal o 3.Phys. Rev.183, 820 (1969)

  34. [34]

    & Warren, M

    Ackland, G. & Warren, M. Soft-mode phase transitions from first principles.Phase Transitions61, 215–223 (1997)

  35. [35]

    & Dovesi, R

    Pascale, F., d’Arco, P., Silvio Gentile, F. & Dovesi, R. Strategies for the optimization of the structure of crystalline compounds.J. Comput. Chem.43, 184–196 (2022)

  36. [36]

    N., Lucero, M

    El-Mellouhi, F., Brothers, E. N., Lucero, M. J. & Scuseria, G. E. Modeling of the cubic and antifer- rodistortive phases of srtio 3 with screened hybrid density functional theory.Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.84, 115122 (2011)

  37. [37]

    & Zhu, J

    Tan, Z., Peng, Y., An, J., Zhang, Q. & Zhu, J. Critical role of order–disorder behavior in perovskite ferroelectric KNbO3.Inorg. Chem.60, 7961–7973 (2021). 26

  38. [38]

    Xie, N.et al.Generation of low-symmetry perovskite structures for ab initio computation.J. Phys. Condens. Matter32, 315901 (2020)

  39. [39]

    X., Skelton, J

    Yang, R. X., Skelton, J. M., Da Silva, E. L., Frost, J. M. & Walsh, A. Assessment of dynamic structural instabilities across 24 cubic inorganic halide perovskites.J. Chem. Phys.152(2020)

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04967(2024)

    Yang, H.et al.Mattersim: Adeeplearningatomisticmodelacrosselements, temperaturesandpressures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04967(2024)

  41. [41]

    P., Simm, G., Ortner, C

    Batatia, I., Kovacs, D. P., Simm, G., Ortner, C. & Csányi, G. Mace: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields.Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.35, 11423– 11436 (2022)

  42. [42]

    Batatia, I.et al.A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry.J. Chem. Phys.163(2025)

  43. [43]

    Commun.16, 10653 (2025)

    Mazitov, A.et al.Pet-mad as a lightweight universal interatomic potential for advanced materials modeling.Nat. Commun.16, 10653 (2025)

  44. [44]

    & Senn, M

    Simpson, S. & Senn, M. S. Octahedral tilting in perovskite polytypes.Chem. Mater.(2025)

  45. [45]

    Cohen, R. E. & Krakauer, H. Lattice dynamics and origin of ferroelectricity in BaTiO3: Linearized- augmented-plane-wave total-energy calculations.Phys. Rev. B42, 6416 (1990)

  46. [46]

    Cohen, R. E. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides.Nature358, 136–138 (1992)

  47. [47]

    C., Lima, M

    Dias, A. C., Lima, M. P. & Da Silva, J. L. Role of structural phases and octahedra distortions in the optoelectronic and excitonic properties of CsGeX3 (X= Cl, Br, I) perovskites.J. Phys. Chem. C125, 19142–19155 (2021)

  48. [48]

    & Ali, R

    Yashima, M. & Ali, R. Structural phase transition and octahedral tilting in the calcium titanate perovskite CaTiO3.Solid State Ion.180, 120–126 (2009)

  49. [49]

    Knight, K. S. Structural and thermoelastic properties of CaTiO3 perovskite between 7 K and 400 K. J. Alloys Compd.509, 6337–6345 (2011)

  50. [50]

    S., Morrison, F., Smith, R

    Sinclair, D., Skakle, J. S., Morrison, F., Smith, R. & Beales, T. Structure and electrical properties of oxygen-deficient hexagonal BaTiO3.J. Mater. Chem.9, 1327–1331 (1999)

  51. [51]

    Nénert, G.et al.Experimental evidence for an intermediate phase in the multiferroic YMnO3.J. Phys. Condens. Matter.19, 466212 (2007)

  52. [52]

    Xie, N.et al.Generation of low-symmetry perovskite structures forab initiocomputation.J. Phys. Condens. Matter.32, 315901 (2020)

  53. [53]

    Lee, J.-H.et al.Resolving the physical origin of octahedral tilting in halide perovskites.Chem. Mater. 28, 4259–4266 (2016)

  54. [54]

    & Stranks, S

    Jung, Y.-K., Dubajic, M. & Stranks, S. D. Electronic consequences of the formation of local tilting in halide perovskites.J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 5862–5867 (2025)

  55. [55]

    Oganov, A. R. & Valle, M. How to quantify energy landscapes of solids.The Journal of chemical physics 130(2009)

  56. [56]

    Vailionis, A.et al.Misfit strain accommodation in epitaxial ABO 3 perovskites: Lattice rotations and lattice modulations.Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.83, 064101 (2011)

  57. [57]

    & Richet, P

    de Ligny, D. & Richet, P. High-temperature heat capacity and thermal expansion of SrTiO3 and SrZrO3 perovskites.Phys. Rev. B53, 3013 (1996)

  58. [58]

    & Kiat, J.-M

    Akbarzadeh, A., Kornev, I., Malibert, C., Bellaiche, L. & Kiat, J.-M. Combined theoretical and ex- perimental study of the low-temperature properties of BaZrO3.Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.72, 205104 (2005). 27

  59. [59]

    Xin, C.et al.Single crystal growth of BaZrO 3 from the melt at 2700°C using optical floating zone technique and growth prospects from BaB2O4 flux at 1350°C.Cryst. Eng. Comm.21, 502–512 (2019)

  60. [60]

    Int.49, 17542–17553 (2023)

    Chahib, S.et al.Investigation of structural, morphological, and dielectric properties of BaSnO3 ceramics and thin films prepared by sol-gel method.Ceram. Int.49, 17542–17553 (2023)

  61. [61]

    Vidya, S.et al.Optical and dielectric properties of nano BaNbO3 prepared by a combustion technique. Adv. Mater. Res.2, 141 (2013)

  62. [62]

    Tenne, D.et al.Absence of low-temperature phase transitions in epitaxial BaTiO 3 thin films.Phys. Rev. B69, 174101 (2004)

  63. [63]

    & Kay, H

    Glaister, R. & Kay, H. An investigation of the cubic-hexagonal transition in barium titanate.Proc. Phys. Soc.76, 763 (1960)

  64. [64]

    Errington, J. R. & Debenedetti, P. G. Relationship between structural order and the anomalies of liquid water.Nature409, 318–321 (2001)

  65. [65]

    P., Sung, C., Notis, M

    Dravid, V. P., Sung, C., Notis, M. & Lyman, C. Crystal symmetry and coherent twin structure of calcium zirconate.Acta Crystallogr. B45, 218–227 (1989)

  66. [66]

    & Pędzich, Z

    Stoch, P., Szczerba, J., Lis, J., Madej, D. & Pędzich, Z. Crystal structure and ab initio calculations of CaZrO3.J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.32, 665–670 (2012)

  67. [67]

    C., Rajab, K

    Feteira, A., Sinclair, D. C., Rajab, K. Z. & Lanagan, M. T. Crystal structure and microwave dielectric properties of alkaline-earth hafnates, AHfO3 (A= Ba, Sr, Ca).J. Am. Ceram. Soc.91, 893–901 (2008)

  68. [68]

    He, R.et al.Structural phase transitions in SrTiO 3 from deep potential molecular dynamics.Phys. Rev. B105, 064104 (2022)

  69. [69]

    A., Blokhin, E., Gryaznov, D., Kotomin, E

    Evarestov, R. A., Blokhin, E., Gryaznov, D., Kotomin, E. A. & Maier, J. Phonon calculations in cubic and tetragonal phases of SrTiO3: A comparative LCAO and plane-wave study.Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.83, 134108 (2011)

  70. [70]

    Loetzsch, R.et al.The cubic to tetragonal phase transition in SrTiO 3 single crystals near its surface under internal and external strains.Appl. Phys. Lett.96(2010)

  71. [71]

    Lan, F.et al.Observing a previously hidden structural-phase transition onset through heteroepitaxial cap response.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.116, 4141–4146 (2019)

  72. [72]

    Merz, W. J. The electric and optical behavior of BaTiO3 single-domain crystals.Phys. Rev.76, 1221 (1949)

  73. [73]

    Pal, P.et al.Origin and tuning of room-temperature multiferroicity in Fe-doped BaTiO3.Phys. Rev. B101, 064409 (2020)

  74. [74]

    & Müller, K

    Okazaki, A., Soejima, Y., Ohama, N. & Müller, K. A. High-resolution x-ray diffraction study of structural phase transition in SrTiO3.Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.24, 257 (1985)

  75. [75]

    He, X.et al.Anharmonic eigenvectors and acoustic phonon disappearance in quantum paraelectric SrTiO3.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 145901 (2020)

  76. [76]

    & Karttunen, A

    Eklund, K. & Karttunen, A. J. Pyroelectric effect in tetragonal ferroelectrics BaTiO3 and KNbO3 studied with density functional theory.J. Phys. Chem. C127, 21806–21815 (2023)

  77. [77]

    D.et al.Raman response of quantum critical ferroelectric Pb-doped SrTiO3.Crystals11, 1469 (2021)

    Linnik, E. D.et al.Raman response of quantum critical ferroelectric Pb-doped SrTiO3.Crystals11, 1469 (2021)

  78. [78]

    & Dovesi, R

    Maul, J., Erba, A., Santos, I., Sambrano, J. & Dovesi, R. In silico infrared and raman spectroscopy under pressure: the case of CaSnO3 perovskite.J. Chem. Phys.142(2015). 28

  79. [79]

    Glerup, M., Knight, K. S. & Poulsen, F. W. High temperature structural phase transitions in SrSnO3 perovskite.Mater. Res. Bull.40, 507–520 (2005)

  80. [80]

    Giannozzi, P.et al.QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quan- tumsimulations of materials.J. Phys. Condens. Matter21, 395502 (2009)

Showing first 80 references.