Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 92 references

In a spin-1/2 XXZ chain, the sound-velocity shift is set by the lattice-spacing curvature of the chain's free energy, and ultrasound attenuation obeys a universal T^3 scaling law in the Tomonaga-Luttinger regime.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 07:54 UTC pith:LF5XXEMC

load-bearing objection A useful velocity-shift identity and a concrete near-saturation attenuation prediction, but the TLL attenuation law has an uncontrolled crossover and the novelty boundary with the authors' own 2005 work is not drawn. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29392 v1 pith:LF5XXEMC submitted 2026-07-31 cond-mat.str-el

Sound attenuation and velocity shift in antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 chains

Edmond Orignac , Emeric Caprani , Roberta Citro This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords spin-1/2 chainXXZ modelsound attenuationsound velocity shiftTomonaga-Luttinger liquidbosonizationmagnetoelastic couplingquantum criticality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that in a spin-1/2 XXZ chain coupled to longitudinal phonons, the sound-velocity shift is determined by the second derivative of the spin-chain free energy with respect to lattice spacing — an identity that lets exact integrability methods compute the shift at any temperature. In the gapless Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid regime, bosonization predicts a universal low-temperature T^2 correction to the velocity and an attenuation coefficient that scales as T^3 times a function of uk/T, interpolating between ~T k^2 at high temperature and ~k^4/T at low temperature relative to the thermal scale. Near the saturation field, where the spin velocity vanishes, attenuation is strongly enhanced, scaling as k/T, with a divergent velocity shift of order T^{-1/2}. If correct, these results turn ultrasound experiments into a direct probe of the thermodynamics of an integrable model and provide scaling predictions that do not depend on the Luttinger parameter.

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (15): the relative sound-velocity shift equals (a^2 / 2mN v_l^2) times the second derivative of the spin-chain free energy with respect to lattice spacing. This identity, generalized to the XXZ chain through free-energy derivatives with respect to the exchange couplings, allows the velocity shift to be calculated with integrability techniques at any temperature. For attenuation, the paper derives Eq. (44), alpha_k = T^3 f(uk/T), with a closed-form scaling function yielding alpha_k ~ T k^2 for uk >> T and alpha_k ~ k^4/T for uk << T, and Eq. (47), giving alpha_k ~ k/T near saturation. The results are universal in that no anomalous exponent depending on the Tomonaga-Lu

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the mapping of the spin-phonon coupling to derivatives of the spin Hamiltonian with respect to lattice spacing, combined in the low-energy limit with the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid description in terms of chiral boson fields. In computing attenuation, only the mixed left-right derivative correlator survives because the phonon velocity is assumed much smaller than the spin velocity u; this yields the universal scaling function. Near saturation, free fermions with quadratic dispersion replace the Luttinger description and produce the k/T enhancement.

Load-bearing premise

The low-temperature attenuation formula assumes the spin velocity u is much larger than the phonon velocity v_l throughout the Tomonaga-Luttinger regime; near saturation u drops as the square root of the distance from the critical field, and the neglected delta-function terms would then modify the scaling law.

What would settle it

Measure the ultrasound attenuation coefficient of a quasi-one-dimensional spin-1/2 antiferromagnet as a function of temperature at a fixed phonon wavenumber k and check whether alpha_k/T^3 collapses onto the single function f(uk/T), with alpha_k ~ k^4/T for uk << T and a maximum near T = 0.131 u k.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The sound-velocity shift becomes computable from exact integrability methods at any temperature, not just in the ground state.
  • In the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid regime, the velocity shift acquires a universal T^2 correction whose coefficient is fixed by the lattice-spacing dependence of the spin velocity.
  • The attenuation scaling law can be checked directly: data at multiple temperatures and wavenumbers should collapse onto the single function f(uk/T).
  • Near saturation, both the T^{-1/2} divergence of the velocity shift and the k/T attenuation are universal signatures of z=2 quantum criticality that should appear in any chain near a magnetization plateau end.
  • The attenuation vanishes for a genuine XY chain because the relevant mixed chiral correlator is absent, providing a qualitative test of the coupling mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted T^3 scaling should be measurable in quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnets with sizable magnetoelastic coupling; deviations would reveal the regime where the spin velocity approaches the phonon velocity or where interchain effects become relevant.
  • The same fan-diagram logic should extend to gapped spin ladders near their field-induced Tomonaga-Luttinger transition, with a similar k/T attenuation enhancement near the critical field.
  • The free-energy curvature identity suggests a general thermodynamic sum rule: in any exactly solvable chain, elastic constants can be obtained directly from lattice-spacing derivatives of the free energy, beyond the XXZ case.
  • A sharp test of the scaling function's shape is to locate the attenuation maximum at T ≈ 0.131 u k; its position depends only on the spin velocity and the wavenumber, not on the coupling strength.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies magnetoelastic coupling in spin-1/2 XXZ chains, considering longitudinal acoustic phonons coupled to the exchange interactions. For the sound-velocity shift it derives a relation to derivatives of the spin-chain free energy with respect to the exchange couplings, thereby making contact with exact thermodynamic methods (Bethe ansatz / quantum transfer matrix). For the attenuation it uses bosonization to obtain a Tomonaga-Luttinger-liquid scaling law, alpha_k = T^3 f(uk/T), with limiting behaviors alpha_k ~ T k^2 for uk >> T and alpha_k ~ k^4/T for uk << T, and a free-fermion treatment near saturation giving an enhanced alpha_k ~ k/T. The paper also discusses the crossover to the fully polarized phase and compares with experiments on quasi-1D antiferromagnets.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides an experimentally testable connection between ultrasound measurements and exact thermodynamic functions of an integrable model, together with universal scaling predictions for the attenuation. The use of the free-energy route via the quantum transfer matrix / Bethe ansatz is a strength, as is the explicit bosonization calculation of the attenuation. However, the central near-saturation attenuation prediction currently rests on an uncontrolled crossover between the Tomonaga-Luttinger and free-fermion descriptions, and the velocity-shift derivation contains an intermediate identity that is only valid at zero field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eqs. (12)-(15)] Equations (12)-(14) are written in a form that is only valid at h=0. For h != 0, the operator appearing in U^(1) is proportional to S_j . S_{j+1} = (H0 + h M)/J, not H0/J. Consequently the correct identities are dF/dJ = (E + hM)/J and d^2F/dJ^2 = -beta Var(H0 + hM)/J^2, as the authors themselves state later in Eqs. (20)-(21). As printed, Eq. (12) uses <H0> and Var(H0), and Eqs. (13)-(14) use <H0>/J, which is false for h != 0. Since Eq. (15) is presented as the general relation, the authors should either explicitly restrict Eqs. (12)-(15) to h=0 or re-derive Eq. (15) from the correct finite-field expressions. This is load-bearing for the finite-field velocity-shift claim.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (43)-(47)] The TLL attenuation scaling (44) is derived by discarding the delta-function contributions from the (d_x phi_R)^2 and (d_x phi_L)^2 correlators, which is legitimate only when u >> v_l. In the TLL phase near saturation, u(h) ~ |h-h_c|^{1/2}, so for any fixed phonon velocity v_l there is always a field h* inside the TLL phase where u(h*) = v_l. At that point the discarded terms resonate, and Eq. (43) itself diverges as u -> v_l. The paper acknowledges this and states that the divergence is an artifact of linearization, then replaces the description by the free-fermion formula (47). However, no controlled matching is provided: there is no calculation showing that Eqs. (44) and (47) join continuously, no estimate of the width of the crossover window, and no prediction for the k,T dependence when |u - v_l| is comparable to v_l. Because the near-saturation enhancement alpha_k ~ k/T is a headli
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (41)] The displayed expression appears to be missing a plus sign between the first and second terms in the prefactor of [(d_x phi_R)^2+(d_x phi_L)^2]; as printed it reads as a product.
  2. [Eq. (24)] The two limits are both labeled dF/dJ. The second one is presumably a different thermodynamic derivative (e.g., dF/dh or a mixed derivative); please correct the label.
  3. [Eq. (42)] The second correlator in the product is printed as <T_tau phi_R(x,tau) phi_R(0,0)>; it should be the left-moving correlator phi_L. The surrounding sentence about 'cross correlations vanish' is also confusing, since the surviving contribution is precisely the product of right and left correlators.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The sentence 'The derivatives are plotted on.' is incomplete.
  5. [Throughout] The notation d^2F/d^2J should be d^2F/dJ^2.
  6. [Sec. III.B] The sentence 'in contrast to the case of Heisenberg and XXZ spin-1/2 chains...' should presumably read 'Heisenberg and XY spin-1/2 chains', since the section is about the general XXZ case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the velocity shift is an exact thermodynamic identity and the attenuation is computed from explicit correlators; the acknowledged u>>v_l breakdown is a validity gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Eq. (15) follows from the phonon self-energy (Eqs. (7)-(9)) plus the exact thermodynamic identities ∂F/∂J=<H0>/J and ∂²F/∂J²=-β<(H0-<H0>)²>/J², so the relative velocity shift is the second derivative of the free energy with respect to lattice spacing; this is an identity, not a fitted result. (The intermediate Eqs. (13)-(14) omit field-dependent hM terms that are later restored in Eq. (20), a notational shortcut rather than a circular reduction.) The low-temperature quadratic shift is obtained by inserting the standard Luttinger-liquid free energy (17), and the XY/Heisenberg field-dependent formulas (20)-(25) come from exact or Bethe-ansatz thermodynamics. Attenuation is computed from the Matsubara response function (36), bosonized in Eqs. (38)-(41), giving Eqs. (43)-(44), and the near-saturation XY result (46)-(47) is an explicit Jordan-Wigner calculation; no parameter is fitted to the predicted scaling law. The paper contains self-citations (Refs. [14], [31], [38], [73], [80], [81]), but none is load-bearing: [38] is a co-author's internship report used for exact XY formulas that are displayed and are standard/externally verifiable, and the others support side remarks or future extensions. The main caveat, stated in the text, is that Eq. (44) is derived for u≫v_l and that near saturation, where u(h)→0, the neglected (∂_x φ_{R/L})² terms can resonate; the paper then switches to the quadratic-dispersion free-fermion result (47) without a controlled matching. This is a real validity/crossover concern, not a circularity: the two formulas are independent calculations and neither is defined in terms of the other. No equation reduces by construction to its own input, so the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles or mediators are introduced. The central quantitative predictions depend on standard model parameters (exchange couplings, their lattice derivatives, phonon mass/velocity) and on established low-energy descriptions (bosonization, free-fermion criticality, QTM/NLIE). The main additional burden beyond standard inputs is the assumption v_l << u and the truncation of the bosonized spin-phonon coupling.

free parameters (3)
  • Magnetoelastic coupling derivatives: dJ/da, d^2J/da^2, dJz/da, d^2Jz/da^2
    These derivatives set the amplitude of the sound-velocity shift and the prefactor of the attenuation. They are not fitted in the paper but are unknown model/material inputs on which all quantitative predictions depend.
  • Bare phonon mass m and sound velocity v_l
    These appear in the prefactors of every velocity-shift and attenuation formula. They are treated as given material parameters, not determined within the paper.
  • Short-distance cutoff a (lattice spacing) in the Luttinger-liquid correlator
    The lattice spacing enters as the ultraviolet cutoff in the chiral correlator, Eq. (42), and as a physical length scale in all scaling arguments. It is not fitted but is essential to the regularization.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Bosonization mapping of the spin-1/2 XXZ chain to a Gaussian Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid with velocity u and Luttinger parameter K
    Invoked throughout Sec. IV, in particular Eqs. (38)-(41), to compute density correlators and to derive the attenuation scaling law.
  • domain assumption Universal free-fermion quadratic dispersion and free-energy scaling near saturation (z=2 commensurate-incommensurate quantum critical point)
    Used for Eq. (25) and for the saturation-regime attenuation, Eq. (47), following Refs. [29,32,35,41]. This is a well-established result but is imported as an assumption about the low-energy description.
  • standard math Tachiki-Maekawa / Kawasaki-Ikushima linear-response expressions for the phonon frequency shift and damping, Eqs. (7)-(9) and Appendix B
    These formulas provide the starting point for the velocity shift and attenuation calculations. They are standard but are a non-trivial input.
  • domain assumption Quantum transfer matrix / nonlinear integral equations exactly solve the finite-temperature thermodynamics of the Heisenberg chain
    Used in Appendix C to obtain dF/dJ and d^2F/dJ^2 numerically. The integral equations are stated but their numerical solution is not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption Phonon velocity v_l is much smaller than spin velocity u throughout the Tomonaga-Luttinger regime
    This justifies dropping the delta-function contributions from (d_x phi_R)^2 and (d_x phi_L)^2 correlators in Sec. IV. It is the weakest load-bearing premise for the attenuation scaling law.
  • domain assumption Decoupled spin chains and only longitudinal acoustic phonons propagating along the chain
    The entire model is single-chain and one-dimensional; interchain coupling and transverse phonons are explicitly deferred in the Conclusion.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 17941 in / 18042 out tokens · 205028 ms · 2026-08-03T07:54:25.133157+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate ultrasound attenuation and sound velocity shift in antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 XXZ chains in magnetic field. We relate the sound velocity shift to derivatives of the free energy with respect to exchange interactions, permitting its calculation with integrability techniques at any temperature. Using bosonization, we predict the sound velocity shift exhibits a quadratic temperature correction at low temperatures in the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid phase. Close to the fully polarized phase, a universal behavior associated with z=2 quantum criticality is found. In the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid phase, ultrasound attenuation obeys a scaling law as a function of wavelength and temperature. An enhancement of attenuation is obtained near the fully polarized phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29392 by Edmond Orignac, Emeric Caprani, Roberta Citro.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. First and second derivatives of the free energy of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Second derivative of the free energy of the Heisenberg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plot of attenuation in the XXZ chain as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In the case of the Heisenberg chain, we have[15] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fan diagram in the vicinity of saturation. In the fully [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    XY chain case In the case of the XY spin chain, using the Jordan- Wigner transformation[36] the exact free energy has been obtained analytically[37]. We have[38] 1 N a ∂F ∂J = Z π a − π a dk 2π cos(ka) e(Jcos(ka)−h)/T + 1,(22) 1 N a ∂2F ∂J 2 =− Z π a − π a dk 2π cos2(ka) 4Tcosh 2 Jcos(ka)−h 2T .(23) Under a particle-hole transformation, one can turnh→ −h,...

  2. [2]

    With the latter[19], the first and sec- ond derivatives of the free energy in the Heisenberg chain with respect to exchange interaction can be obtained nu- merically

    Case of the Heisenberg chain In the case of the Heisenberg spin chain, the free energy at any temperature can be calculated with the thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz[12] or the nonlinear in- tegral equation following the development of the path integral formulation of the quantum transfer matrix approach[19, 46]. With the latter[19], the first and sec- ond deri...

  3. [3]

    Tachiki and S

    M. Tachiki and S. Maekawa, Prog. Theor. Phys.51, 1 (1974)

    1974

  4. [4]

    Inverting the relation givesQ as a function ofh/J

    Ground state The ground state energye 0(h, J) of the Heisenberg spin chain and is obtained by solving a linear integral equation[19, 43], ρ(x) = 1 π(x2 + 1) − Z Q −Q dy 2π 4 4 + (x−y) 2 ρ(y),(C1) with magnetization given by m= 1 2 − Z Q −Q dxρ(x).(C2) The magnetic field is obtained from the auxiliary integral equation ξ(x) = 1− Z Q −Q dy 2π 4 4 + (x−y) 2 ...

  5. [5]

    Finite temperature To calculate the free energy of the Heisenberg chain in a magnetic field, we must solve the coupled integral equations[19] that are analytically derived by exploiting the Bethe Ansatz to diagonalize the Quantum Transfer Matrix (QTM), thereby reducing an infinite set of ther- modynamic equations into just two coupled equations governed b...

  6. [6]

    Tani and H

    K. Tani and H. Mori, Prog. Theor. Phys.34, 876 (1968)

    1968

  7. [7]

    Kawasaki and A

    K. Kawasaki and A. Ikushima, Phys. Rev. B1, 3143 (1970), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.1.3143

    1970

  8. [8]

    Yamaguchi, S

    H. Yamaguchi, S. Yasin, S. Zherlitsyn, K. Omura, S. Kimura, S. Yoshii, K. Okunishi, Z. He, T. Taniyama, M. Itoh, et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 033701 (2011), URLhttps://journals.jps.jp/doi/abs/10. 1143/JPSJ.80.033701

    2011

  9. [9]

    Pawlak, inHorizons in World Physics, edited by L

    A. Pawlak, inHorizons in World Physics, edited by L. Pedroza and M. Everett (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, 2009), vol. 268, p. 69, URLhttp: //hdl.handle.net/10593/13860

    2009

  10. [10]

    Poirier, M

    M. Poirier, M. Castonguay, A. Revcolevschi, and G. Dhalenne, Phys. Rev. B66, 054402 (2002), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 66.054402

    doi:10.1103/physrevb 2002

  11. [11]

    B. Wolf, S. Zherlitsyn, B. L¨ uthi, N. Harrison, U. L¨ ow, V. Pashchenko, M. Lang, G. Margraf, H.- W. Lerner, E. Dahlmann, et al., Phys. Rev. B69, 092403 (2004), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.69.092403

    2004

  12. [12]

    have been successfully employed to compute the ground-state contribution to the sound velocity shift[13] and to relate it to thermodynamic derivatives of the free energy. More recently, extensions to finite-temperature regimes and dynamical response functions have been ex- plored using integrability-based methods and effective field theory descriptions, f...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Chiatti, A

    O. Chiatti, A. Sytcheva, J. Wosnitza, S. Zherlitsyn, A. A. Zvyagin, V. S. Zapf, M. Jaime, and A. Paduan-Filho, Phys. Rev. B78, 094406 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Poirier, A

    M. Poirier, A. Langlois, C. Bourbonnais, P. Foury- Leylekian, A. Moradpour, and J.-P. Pouget, Phys. Rev. B86, 085111 (2012), arXiv: 1207.6361, URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/1207.6361

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    E. G. Sergeicheva, S. S. Sosin, D. I. Gorbunov, S. Zher- litsyn, G. Gu, and I. Zaliznyak, Phys. Rev. B101, 201107 (2020), arXiv: 1911.07592, URLhttp://arxiv. org/abs/1911.07592

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    K. Y. Povarov, D. E. Graf, A. Hauspurg, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, T. Sakurai, H. Ohta, S. Kimura, H. Nojiri, V. O. Garlea, et al., Nature Communications15, 2295 (2024), arXiv:2306.15450 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Takahashi,Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1999)

    M. Takahashi,Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1999)

    1999

  18. [18]

    Tsyplyatyev, P

    O. Tsyplyatyev, P. Kopietz, Y. Tsui, B. Wolf, P. T. Cong, N. van Well, F. Ritter, C. Krellner, W. Aßmus, and M. Lang, Phys. Rev. B95, 045120 (2017), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.045120

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.045120 2017

  19. [19]

    Citro, E

    R. Citro, E. Orignac, and T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024434 (2005), cond-mat/0411256

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  20. [20]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  21. [21]

    Destri and H

    C. Destri and H. de Vega, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2313 (1992)

    1992

  22. [22]

    Destri and H

    C. Destri and H. de Vega, Nucl. Phys. B438, 413 (1995)

    1995

  23. [23]

    Kl¨ umper, Eur

    A. Kl¨ umper, Eur. Phys. J. B5, 677 (1998)

    1998

  24. [24]

    Kl¨ umper and D

    A. Kl¨ umper and D. C. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4701 (2000)

    2000

  25. [25]

    Kluemper and K

    A. Kluemper and K. Sakai, J. Phys. A35, 2173 (2002)

    2002

  26. [26]

    Bouchoule, R

    I. Bouchoule, R. Citro, T. Duty, T. Giamarchi, R. G. Hulet, M. Klanjˇ sek, E. Orignac, and B. Weber, Nature Reviews Physics7, 565 (2025), URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-025-00866-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-025-00866-w 2025

  27. [27]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics (Pergamon Press, New York, 1959)

    1959

  28. [28]

    J. F. Negele and H. Orland,Quantum Many–Particle Systems(Addison–Wesley, New York, 1988)

    1988

  29. [29]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon Press, New York, 1959)

    1959

  30. [30]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. Honecker, J. Stat. Mech.: The- ory Exp.2004, P07012 (2004)

    2004

  31. [31]

    G. I. Japaridze and A. A. Nersesyan, JETP Lett.27, 334 (1978)

    1978

  32. [32]

    V. L. Pokrovsky and A. L. Talapov, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 65 (1979)

    1979

  33. [33]

    H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B22, 5274 (1980)

    1980

  34. [34]

    Chitra and T

    R. Chitra and T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. B55, 5816 (1997)

    1997

  35. [35]

    D. C. Cabra and J. E. Drut, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 1445 (2003)

    2003

  36. [36]

    Orignac and R

    E. Orignac and R. Citro, Phys. Rev. B71, 214419 (2005), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.71.214419

    2005

  37. [37]

    Sachdev, T

    S. Sachdev, T. Senthil, and R. Shankar, Phys. Rev. B50, 258 (1994)

    1994

  38. [38]

    Blosser, N

    D. Blosser, N. Kestin, K. Y. Povarov, R. Bewley, E. Coira, T. Giamarchi, and A. Zheludev, Phys. Rev. B96, 134406 (2017), arXiv: 1707.05243, URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/1707.05243

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Blosser, V

    D. Blosser, V. K. Bhartiya, D. J. Voneshen, and A. Zhe- 12 ludev, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 247201 (2018), arXiv: 1806.10392, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.247201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Maeda, C

    Y. Maeda, C. Hotta, and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 057205 (2007), arXiv: cond-mat/0703727, URL http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0703727

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Z. Phys.47, 631 (1928)

    1928

  42. [42]

    Katsura, Phys

    S. Katsura, Phys. Rev.127, 1508 (1962), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.129, 2835 (1963)]

    1962

  43. [43]

    Caprani, Internship report Master 2 (in French), ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure de Lyon, Lyon, France (2023)

    E. Caprani, Internship report Master 2 (in French), ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure de Lyon, Lyon, France (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Olver, D

    F. Olver, D. Lozier, R. Boisvert, and C. Clark, eds.,NIST handbook of mathematical functions(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010), ISBN 9780521140638

    2010

  45. [45]

    Guan, Int

    X. Guan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B28, 1430015 (2014), arXiv:1408.4473 [cond-mat], URLhttp://arxiv.org/ abs/1408.4473

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Zheludev, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics131, 34 (2020), arXiv: 2004.06012, URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1134/S1063776120070183

    A. Zheludev, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics131, 34 (2020), arXiv: 2004.06012, URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1134/S1063776120070183

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Oshikawa, M

    M. Oshikawa, M. Yamanaka, and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1984 (1997)

    1984

  48. [48]

    D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Phys. Rev. B 58, 6241 (1998)

    1998

  49. [49]

    D. C. Mattis and T. D. Schultz, Phys. Rev.129, 175 (1963)

    1963

  50. [50]

    Derzhko, J

    O. Derzhko, J. Streˇ cka, and L. G´ alisov´ a, The European Physical Journal B86, 88 (2013), URLhttp://link. springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2013-30979-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013-30979-4 2013

  51. [51]

    Destri and H

    C. Destri and H. de Vega, Nucl. Phys. B504, 621 (1997)

    1997

  52. [52]

    F. He, Y. Jiang, Y.-C. Yu, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-W. Guan, Phys. Rev. B96, 220401 (2017), arXiv:1702.05903, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 96.220401

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Breunig, M

    O. Breunig, M. Garst, A. Kl¨ umper, J. Rohrkamp, M. M. Turnbull, and T. Lorenz, Science Advances3, eaao3773 (2017), URLhttps://advances.sciencemag. org/content/3/12/eaao3773

    2017

  54. [54]

    C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Phys. Rev.150, 327 (1966)

    1966

  55. [55]

    M. P. M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. B23, 6111 (1981)

    1981

  56. [56]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1358 (1980)

    1980

  57. [57]

    G. D. Mahan,Many Particle Physics(Plenum, New York, 1981)

    1981

  58. [58]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B39, 4620 (1989)

    1989

  59. [59]

    V. Zapf, M. Jaime, and C. D. Batista, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 563 (2014)

    2014

  60. [60]

    Klanjsek, M

    M. Klanjsek, M. Horvatic, S. Kramer, S. Mukhopadhyay, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier, E. Canevet, B. Grenier, P. Le- jay, and E. Orignac, Phys. Rev. B92, 060408(R) (2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    Faure, S

    Q. Faure, S. Takayoshi, V. Simonet, B. Grenier, M. M ˚ ansson, J. S. White, G. S. Tucker, C. R¨ uegg, P. Le- jay, T. Giamarchi, et al., Physical Review Letters123, 027204 (2019), arXiv: 1903.04173, URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.027204

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Zheludev, Z

    A. Zheludev, Z. Honda, Y. Chen, C. L. Broholm, K. Kat- sumata, and S. M. Shapiro, Physical Review Letters 88, 077206 (2002), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.077206

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.077206 2002

  63. [63]

    A. K. Bera, B. Lake, A. T. M. N. Islam, B. Klemke, E. Faulhaber, and J. M. Law, Physical Review B87, 224423 (2013), arXiv:1310.0221 [cond-mat.str-el], URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0221

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    S. Li, Z. Wu, Y. Wang, J. Luo, K. Du, X. Xu, Z. Hu, Y. Chen, J. Yang, Z. Liu, et al., Physi- cal Review B111, 195164 (2025), arXiv:2411.19538 [cond-mat], URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.111.195164

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Klanjˇ sek, H

    M. Klanjˇ sek, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier, M. Hor- vati´ c, B. Chiari, O. Piovesana, P. Bouillot, C. Kol- lath, E. Orignac, R. Citro, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 137207 (2008), URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.137207

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.137207 2008

  66. [66]

    T. Hong, Y. H. Kim, C. Hotta, Y. Takano, G. Tremelling, M. M. Turnbull, C. P. Landee, H.-J. Kang, N. B. Chris- tensen, K. Lefmann, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 137207 (2010)

    2010

  67. [67]

    R. Chen, H. J. Hu, Z. Qu, T. Li, C. B. Liu, C. L. Wang, S. J. Sun, C. Dong, and Y. Qiu, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 165801 (2024), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ad15c9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ad15c9 2024

  68. [68]

    Yoshida, N

    Y. Yoshida, N. Tateiwa, M. Mito, T. Kawae, K. Takeda, Y. Hosokoshi, and K. Inoue, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 037203 (2005)

    2005

  69. [69]

    M. B. Stone, Y. Chen, D. H. Reich, C. Broholm, G. Xu, J. R. D. Copley, and J. C. Cook, Phys. Rev. B90, 094419 (2014), arXiv:1406.7596 [cond-mat], URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/1406.7596

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Willenberg, H

    B. Willenberg, H. Ryll, K. Kiefer, D. A. Tennant, F. Groitl, K. Rolfs, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, K. C. Rule, A. U. B. Wolter, et al., Phys. Rev. B91, 060407 (2015), arXiv:1406.6149 [cond-mat], URLhttp://arxiv.org/ abs/1406.6149

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [71]

    S. S. Islam, P. K. Mukharjee, P. K. Biswas, M. Telling, Y. Skourski, K. M. Ranjith, M. Baenitz, Y. Inagaki, Y. Furukawa, A. A. Tsirlin, et al., Physical Review B 109, L060406 (2024), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L060406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l060406 2024

  72. [72]

    Pfeuty, Ann

    P. Pfeuty, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.)27, 79 (1970)

    1970

  73. [73]

    A. Dutta,Quantum phase transitions in transverse field spin models: from statistical physics to quantum infor- mation(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2015), ISBN 978-1-107-06879-7, arXiv:1012.0653 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  74. [74]

    Matsuura, P

    K. Matsuura, P. T. Cong, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, N. Abe, and T.-h. Arima, Physical Review Letters 124, 127205 (2020), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.127205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.127205 2020

  75. [75]

    Cl´ emancey, H

    M. Cl´ emancey, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier, M. Horvatic, J.-B. Fouet, S. Miyahara, F. Mila, B. Chiari, and O. Pi- ovesana, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 167204 (2006)

    2006

  76. [76]

    Dzyaloshinskii, J

    I. Dzyaloshinskii, J. Phys. Chem. Solids4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  77. [77]

    Moriya, Phys

    T. Moriya, Phys. Rev.120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  78. [78]

    Orignac, R

    E. Orignac, R. Citro, S. Capponi, and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. B76, 144422 (2007), arXiv:0706.3590

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  79. [79]

    Giamarchi and A

    T. Giamarchi and A. M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. B59, 11398 (1999), cond-mat/9810219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  80. [80]

    V. Y. Irkhin and A. A. Katanin, Phys. Rev. B61, 6757 (2000)

    2000

Showing first 80 references.