REVIEW 3 cited by
Cosmic Complementarity: H₀ and Omega_m from Combining CMB Experiments and Redshift Surveys
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Cosmic Complementarity: H₀ and Omega_m from Combining CMB Experiments and Redshift Surveys
read the original abstract
We show that upcoming CMB satellite experiments and large redshift surveys can be used together to yield 5% determinations of H_0 and Omega_m, an order of magnitude improvement over CMB data alone. CMB anisotropies provide the sound horizon at recombination as a standard ruler. For reasonable baryon fractions, this scale is imprinted on the galaxy power spectrum as a series of spectral features. Measuring these features in redshift space determines the Hubble constant, which in turn yields Omega_m once combined with CMB data. Since the oscillations in both power spectra are frozen in at recombination, this test is insensitive to low-redshift cosmology.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
DESI DR2 BAO data exhibits 2.3 sigma tension with CMB in Lambda-CDM but prefers evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) at 3.1 sigma with CMB and 2.8-4.2 sigma when including supernovae.
-
On the origin of the BAOtr-DESI tension
No CMB-consistent CPL dark energy model can simultaneously fit both the BAOtr and DESI datasets; the 3.7-sigma disagreement at z=0.51 sets an irreducible floor.
-
Dissipative Unimodular Gravity: Linking Energy Diffusion to Bulk Viscosity as an Alternative to $\Lambda$CDM under DESI DR2 Data
A viscous version of unimodular gravity fits late-time cosmological data as well as ΛCDM, but the fitted viscosity is consistent with zero and the claimed energy nonconservation is not statistically significant.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.