Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy

Philip Resnik

Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cmp-lg/9511007 v1 pith:UROD5SD5 submitted 1995-11-29 cmp-lg cs.CL

Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy

Philip Resnik This is my paper

classification cmp-lg cs.CL

keywords similaritycontenthumaninformationmeasuresemantictaxonomyapproach

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

This paper presents a new measure of semantic similarity in an IS-A taxonomy, based on the notion of information content. Experimental evaluation suggests that the measure performs encouragingly well (a correlation of r = 0.79 with a benchmark set of human similarity judgments, with an upper bound of r = 0.90 for human subjects performing the same task), and significantly better than the traditional edge counting approach (r = 0.66).

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

When Should LLMs Be Less Specific? Selective Abstraction for Reliable Long-Form Text Generation
cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

Atom-wise selective abstraction—replacing low-confidence factual claims with higher-confidence, less specific versions—improves the risk-coverage trade-off in long-form generation by up to 27.73% AURC over claim removal.