Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hamiltonian Theories of the FQHE

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/0205326 v4 pith:IIERBMON submitted 2002-05-15 cond-mat.mes-hall

Hamiltonian Theories of the FQHE

classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords hamiltonianwhattheoriesapproachelectronsstatescompositefermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper reviews progress on the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE) based on what we term hamiltonian theories, i.e., theories that proceed from the microscopic electronic hamiltonian to the final solution via a sequence of transformations and approximations, either in the hamiltonian or path integral approach, as compared to theories based on exact diagonalization or trial wavefunctions. We focus on the Chern-Simons (CS) approach in which electrons are converted to CS fermions or bosons that carry along flux tubes and our Extended Hamiltonian Theory (EHT) in which electrons are paired with pseudo-vortices to form composite fermions (CF) whose properties are a lot closer to the ultimate low-energy quasiparticles. We address a variety of qualitative and quantitative questions: In what sense do electrons really bind to vortices? What is the internal structure of the Composite Fermion and what does it mean? What exactly is the dipole picture? How are (approximate) transport gaps, zero-temperature magnetic transitions, the temperature dependent polarizations of gapped and gapless states, the NMR relaxation rate $1/T_1$ in gapless states, and gaps in inhomogeneous states computed? It is seen that though the CS and EHT approaches agree whenever a comparison is possible, results that are transparent in one approach are typically opaque in the other, making them truly complementary.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hyperdeterminant wavefunctions

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5

    Hyperdeterminant wavefunctions with a locality structure, plus VMPI effective theories and projective expansion, give a practical variational framework for fractional Chern insulators and quantum spin liquids.