REVIEW 3 cited by
Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. VI. Accuracy of the post-Newtonian expansion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. VI. Accuracy of the post-Newtonian expansion
read the original abstract
A particle of mass $\mu$ moves on a circular orbit around a nonrotating black hole of mass $M$. Under the assumption $\mu \ll M$ the gravitational waves emitted by such a binary system can be calculated exactly numerically using black-hole perturbation theory. If, further, the particle is slowly moving, then the waves can be calculated approximately analytically, and expressed in the form of a post-Newtonian expansion. We determine the accuracy of this expansion in a quantitative way by calculating the reduction in signal-to-noise ratio incurred when matched filtering the exact signal with a nonoptimal, post-Newtonian filter.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Gravitational waveforms from binaries in higher-derivative gravity: a Love story
Higher-derivative gravity corrections to binary gravitational waveforms and energy fluxes appear at 5PN order and scale universally with the black hole's ℓ=2 Love number.
-
Gravitational waveforms from binaries in higher-derivative gravity: a Love story
In higher-derivative gravity, the leading correction to extreme-mass-ratio inspiral waveforms and fluxes enters at 5PN order and is controlled by the ℓ=2 tidal Love number.
-
Convergence of post-Newtonian for quasi-circular non-precessing comparable mass ratios BBHs
For orbital velocities below 0.45, PN energy flux agreement with NR improves up to incomplete 6PN with non-monotonic behavior, but convergence is lost near v approximately 0.5.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.