REVIEW 1 cited by
Including Systematic Uncertainties in Confidence Interval Construction for Poisson Statistics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Including Systematic Uncertainties in Confidence Interval Construction for Poisson Statistics
read the original abstract
One way to incorporate systematic uncertainties into the calculation of confidence intervals is by integrating over probability density functions parametrizing the uncertainties. In this note we present a development of this method which takes into account uncertainties in the prediction of background processes, uncertainties in the signal detection efficiency and background efficiency and allows for a correlation between the signal and background detection efficiencies. We implement this method with the Feldman & Cousins unified approach with and without conditioning. We present studies of coverage for the Feldman & Cousins and Neyman ordering schemes. In particular, we present two different types of coverage tests for the case where systematic uncertainties are included. To illustrate the method we show the relative effect of including systematic uncertainties the case of dark matter search as performed by modern neutrino tel escopes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Light Dark Matter Discovery Potential and Model Selection at LDMX
LDMX Phase II is projected to discover R=2.5 thermal complex-scalar DM at 5σ and to discriminate dark-photon electromagnetic-moment models via 2D Bayes factors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.