REVIEW 4 cited by
Measurement of σ(e^+e^-to π^+ π^- γ) and extraction of σ(e^+e^-to π^+π^-) below 1 {rm GeV} with the KLOE detector
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Measurement of σ(e^+e^-to π^+ π^- γ) and extraction of σ(e^+e^-to π^+π^-) below 1 {rm GeV} with the KLOE detector
read the original abstract
We have measured the cross section $\sigma(e^+e^-\to \pi^+\pi^- \gamma)$ at an energy $W=m_\phi=1.02$ GeV with the KLOE detector at the electron-positron collider DA$\Phi$NE. From the dependence of the cross section on the invariant mass of the two-pion system, we extract $\sigma(e^+e^-\to \pi^+\pi^-)$ for the mass range $0.35<s<0.95$ GeV$^2$. From this result, we calculate the pion form factor and the hadronic contribution to the muon anomaly, $a_\mu$.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Next-to-leading order FsQED corrections to radiative pion pair production
FsQED NLO structure-dependent corrections to radiative pion-pair production are at the permille (mass) to percent (angular/AFB) level, agree with GVMD, and are now in BabaYaga@NLO.
-
Towards a Fully Automated Differential $\text{NNLO}_\text{EW}$ Generator for Lepton Colliders
A framework based on the YFS theorem enables process-independent local IR subtraction and resummation matching for automated NNLO_EW calculations in lepton collider processes.
-
The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update
The updated SM prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is 116592033(62)×10^{-11}, showing no tension with the experimental average of 38(63)×10^{-11}.
-
The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model
The Standard Model value for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is 116591810(43)×10^{-11}, 3.7σ below the Brookhaven experimental measurement.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.