REVIEW 2 cited by
Addendum To Our Paper: "Radiative Tau Decays With One Pseudoscalar Meson"
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Addendum To Our Paper: "Radiative Tau Decays With One Pseudoscalar Meson"
abstract
In a previous paper we have calculated the decay $\tau\to\pi\nu_\tau\gamma$. We used a given relative sign between the internal bremsstrahlung and the structure dependent radiation, which has been used by several other authors before. However, we believe that there are good arguments why the opposite sign is the physical one. We briefly discuss these arguments and then investigate how the predictions for the decay $\tau\to\pi\nu_\tau\gamma$ are affected by this sign.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Comment on "Radiative corrections to tau -> pi(K) nu_tau[gamma]: A reliable new physics test"
The GR10–DF axial dictionary entry has the wrong sign, so GR10 carries the wrong vector sign versus the anomaly; δr_SD moves from +0.150% to +0.146% (π) and ~+0.16% (K).
-
Comment on "Radiative corrections to tau -> pi(K) nu_tau[gamma]: A reliable new physics test"
The GR10–DF dictionary has the wrong axial sign, so GR10 matches the chiral axial prediction but opposes the anomaly in the vector sector; the numerical shift in δr_SD is tiny (−0.004% for pions).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.