REVIEW 3 cited by
Nuclear matter incompressibility coefficient in relativistic and nonrelativistic microscopic models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Nuclear matter incompressibility coefficient in relativistic and nonrelativistic microscopic models
read the original abstract
We systematically analyze the recent claim that nonrelativistic and relativistic mean field (RMF) based random phase approximation (RPA) calculations for the centroid energy E_0 of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance yield for the nuclear matter incompressibility coefficient, K_{nm}, values which differ by about 20%. For an appropriate comparison with the RMF based RPA calculations, we obtain the parameters for the Skyrme force used in the nonrelativistic model by adopting the same procedure as employed in the determination of the NL3 parameter set of an effective Lagrangian used in the RMF model. Our investigation suggest that the discrepancy between the values of K_{nm} predicted by the relativistic and nonrelativistic models is significantly less than 20%.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TTE-CAM: Self-Explainable Class Activation Maps for Pretrained Black-Box CNNs
A test-time convolution-head replacement converts pretrained CNNs into self-explainable models that keep black-box accuracy and produce faithful class activation maps.
-
Bayesian analysis of the shear modulus in the neutron-star crust
Bayesian modeling with informed priors reduces uncertainties in neutron-star crust shear properties, predicting torsional mode frequencies of 20-50 Hz compatible with observations.
-
The equation of state for neutron stars
A textbook-style review of the neutron-star equation of state covering the models, experimental and observational constraints, and open questions, with no new result claimed or derived.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.