pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: physics/0408124 · v2 · submitted 2004-08-30 · ⚛️ physics.data-an · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Boosted Decision Trees as an Alternative to Artificial Neural Networks for Particle Identification

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ⚛️ physics.data-an hep-ex
keywords artificialexperimentidentificationnetworksparticlealgorithmsboostedboosting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The efficacy of particle identification is compared using artificial neutral networks and boosted decision trees. The comparison is performed in the context of the MiniBooNE, an experiment at Fermilab searching for neutrino oscillations. Based on studies of Monte Carlo samples of simulated data, particle identification with boosting algorithms has better performance than that with artificial neural networks for the MiniBooNE experiment. Although the tests in this paper were for one experiment, it is expected that boosting algorithms will find wide application in physics.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LHC signatures of a light pseudoscalar in a flipped two-Higgs scenario: the usefulness of boosted $b{\bar b}$ pairs

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Boosted di-b-jet tagging plus BDT analysis yields 5-10 sigma significance for a light pseudoscalar in flipped 2HDM with 3 ab^{-1} including 10% systematics.

  2. Toward a Community Roadmap for High Energy Physics and Artificial Intelligence in China and Beyond

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A workshop-derived partial overview of AI applications in high energy physics serves as a starting point for building a community roadmap.