REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes
read the original abstract
Consider the finite regular language L_n = {w0 : w \in {0,1}^*, |w| \le n}. It was shown by Ambainis, Nayak, Ta-Shma and Vazirani that while this language is accepted by a deterministic finite automaton of size O(n), any one-way quantum finite automaton (QFA) for it has size 2^{Omega(n/log n)}. This was based on the fact that the evolution of a QFA is required to be reversible. When arbitrary intermediate measurements are allowed, this intuition breaks down. Nonetheless, we show a 2^{Omega(n)} lower bound for such QFA for L_n, thus also improving the previous bound. The improved bound is obtained by simple entropy arguments based on Holevo's theorem. This method also allows us to obtain an asymptotically optimal (1-H(p))n bound for the dense quantum codes (random access codes) introduced by Ambainis et al. We then turn to Holevo's theorem, and show that in typical situations, it may be replaced by a tighter and more transparent in-probability bound.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Certified quantum supremacy in entanglement-assisted prepare-measure random-access-code
Entanglement-assisted 4 o1 and 4 o2 PMRACs achieve optimal success probabilities ≈0.853 and ≈0.933 that certify unitaries and outperform classical and standard quantum RACs; upper bounds and n o n-2 advantage follow.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.