pith. sign in

hub

VLM4VLA: Revisiting Vision-Language-Models in Vision-Language-Action Models

20 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

20 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, which integrate pretrained large Vision-Language Models (VLM) into their policy backbone, are gaining significant attention for their promising generalization capabilities. This paper revisits a fundamental yet seldom systematically studied question: how VLM choice and competence translate to downstream VLA policies performance? We introduce VLM4VLA, a minimal adaptation pipeline that converts general-purpose VLMs into VLA policies using only a small set of new learnable parameters for fair and efficient comparison. Despite its simplicity, VLM4VLA proves surprisingly competitive with more sophisticated network designs. Through extensive empirical studies on various downstream tasks across three benchmarks, we find that while VLM initialization offers a consistent benefit over training from scratch, a VLM's general capabilities are poor predictors of its downstream task performance. This challenges common assumptions, indicating that standard VLM competence is necessary but insufficient for effective embodied control. We further investigate the impact of specific embodied capabilities by fine-tuning VLMs on seven auxiliary embodied tasks (e.g., embodied QA, visual pointing, depth estimation). Contrary to intuition, improving a VLM's performance on specific embodied skills does not guarantee better downstream control performance. Finally, modality-level ablations identify the visual module in VLM, rather than the language component, as the primary performance bottleneck. We demonstrate that injecting control-relevant supervision into the vision encoder of the VLM yields consistent gains, even when the encoder remains frozen during downstream fine-tuning. This isolates a persistent domain gap between current VLM pretraining objectives and the requirements of embodied action-planning.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 other 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 20

polarities

background 2 unclear 1

clear filters

representative citing papers

Action with Visual Primitives

cs.RO · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AVP architecture has VLM emit visual-primitive tokens to condition flow-matching action expert, yielding 27.61% higher success rate than pi_0.5 on real-robot pick-and-place tasks.

UAM: A Dual-Stream Perspective on Forgetting in VLA Training

cs.CV · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

UAM adds a Dorsal Expert initialized from a generative model and trained on visual dynamics prediction to preserve over 95% of VLM multimodal ability in VLA training while achieving top success rates on manipulation tasks including OOD cases.

Rethinking VLM Representation for VLA Initialization

cs.CV · 2026-05-25 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Experiments indicate original VLM representations are crucial for VLA performance, LoRA outperforms full finetuning, and staged robot-data pretraining yields the strongest initialization.

QuoVLA: Quotient Space for Vision-Language-Action Models

cs.CV · 2026-05-24 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

QuoVLA introduces a quotient-space framework that compresses VLM latents into action-sufficient representations via quantization and dual-branch design for better VLA generalization.

citing papers explorer

Showing 20 of 20 citing papers.