Pith. sign in

hub

arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00184 (2023)

23 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 23 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

23 Pith papers citing it
23 external citations · Pith
abstract

The advent of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized natural language processing, enabling the generation of coherent and contextually relevant human-like text. As LLMs increasingly powerconversational agents used by the general public world-wide, the synthetic personality traits embedded in these models, by virtue of training on large amounts of human data, is becoming increasingly important. Since personality is a key factor determining the effectiveness of communication, we present a novel and comprehensive psychometrically valid and reliable methodology for administering and validating personality tests on widely-used LLMs, as well as for shaping personality in the generated text of such LLMs. Applying this method to 18 LLMs, we found: 1) personality measurements in the outputs of some LLMs under specific prompting configurations are reliable and valid; 2) evidence of reliability and validity of synthetic LLM personality is stronger for larger and instruction fine-tuned models; and 3) personality in LLM outputs can be shaped along desired dimensions to mimic specific human personality profiles. We discuss the application and ethical implications of the measurement and shaping method, in particular regarding responsible AI.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

HEART-Bench: Do LLM Agents Exhibit Human-like Psychology?

cs.CL · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

HEART-Bench evaluates LLM agents on psychological consistency using 11 Big-Five-grounded characters with 1,000 episodic memories each and 64 DIAMONDS-based decision scenarios, yielding 673 validated MCQs.

A Survey on LLM-based Conversational User Simulation

cs.CL · 2026-04-27 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM-based conversational user simulation, analyzes core techniques and evaluation methods, and identifies open challenges in the field.

Stabilising Generative Models of Attitude Change

cs.AI · 2026-04-02 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Classic attitude-change theories can be rendered as generative agents that match known experimental patterns, but only after manual stabilisation that surfaces undocumented operational commitments.

A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

cs.AI · 2023-08-22 · accept · novelty 6.0

A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future directions.

Human Psychometric Questionnaires Mischaracterize LLM Behavior

cs.CL · 2025-09-12 · conditional · novelty 5.0

Standard psychometric questionnaires like the Big Five and PVQ produce different and more consistent results than ecologically valid questions drawn from real user conversations, suggesting the former may mischaracterize LLM behavior.

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: Two Faces of LLMs

cs.CR · 2023-12-06 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

Impersonating complex misaligned personas via biographies and role-play bypasses safety in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Deepseek, succeeding on 38-40 out of 40 illicit questions across tested models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 23 of 23 citing papers.