Pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Less

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (67%).

35 Pith papers citing it
Background 67% of classified citations
abstract

Comparison of fine-tuning models with reinforcement learning (RL) and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) reveals that, despite similar performance at a new task, RL preserves prior knowledge and capabilities significantly better. We find that the degree of forgetting is determined by the distributional shift, measured as the KL-divergence between the fine-tuned and base policy evaluated on the new task. Our analysis reveals that on-policy RL is implicitly biased towards KL-minimal solutions among the many that solve the new task, whereas SFT can converge to distributions arbitrarily far from the base model. We validate these findings through experiments with large language models and robotic foundation models and further provide theoretical justification for why on-policy RL updates lead to a smaller KL change. We term this principle $\textit{RL's Razor}$: among all ways to solve a new task, RL prefers those closest in KL to the original model.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 8 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 33 2025 2

representative citing papers

On the Geometry of On-Policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

OPD updates occupy a relaxed off-principal regime and rapidly lock into a low-dimensional subspace that is functionally sufficient for its performance, distinct from SFT and RLVR trajectories.

Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Fast-Slow Training uses context optimization as fast weights alongside parameter updates as slow weights to achieve up to 3x better sample efficiency, higher performance, and less catastrophic forgetting than standard RL in continual LLM learning.

Unsupervised Process Reward Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Unsupervised PRMs derived from LLM probabilities achieve up to 15% better error detection than LLM judges and match supervised PRMs in verification and RL tasks.

PARTREP: Learning What to Repeat for Decoder-only LLMs

cs.CL · 2026-07-02 · conditional · novelty 6.0

PartRep selects high-NLL tokens via a lightweight early-exit gate for partial prompt repetition, retaining most full-repetition gains at 59.4% KV cache and 79% prefill FLOPs on eight benchmarks.

Rotation-Preserving Supervised Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RPSFT improves the in-domain versus out-of-domain performance trade-off during LLM supervised fine-tuning by penalizing rotations in pretrained singular subspaces as a proxy for loss-sensitive directions.

ZAYA1-8B Technical Report

cs.AI · 2026-05-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ZAYA1-8B is a reasoning MoE model with 700M active parameters that matches larger models on math and coding benchmarks and reaches 91.9% on AIME'25 via Markovian RSA test-time compute.

Towards Long-Lived Robots: Continual Learning VLA Models via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

cs.RO · 2026-02-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

LifeLong-RFT applies chunking-level on-policy reinforcement learning with Quantized Action Consistency Reward, Continuous Trajectory Alignment Reward, and Format Compliance Reward to fine-tune VLA models, achieving a 22% average success rate gain over supervised fine-tuning on the LIBERO benchmark's

Emergent Slow Thinking in LLMs as Inverse Tree Freezing

cs.AI · 2025-09-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RLVR drives a concept network in LLMs through nucleation and freezing into inverse trees that support slow thinking, and intervening with brief SFT at peak frustration outperforms standard RLVR while post-freeze SFT causes forgetting.

citing papers explorer

Showing 35 of 35 citing papers.