arxiv: 2605.13080 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Learning to See What You Need: Gaze Attention for Multimodal Large Language Models

Junha Song , Byeongho Heo , Geonmo Gu , Jaegul Choo , Dongyoon Han , Sangdoo Yun

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords Gaze AttentionMultimodal Large Language ModelsVisual Attention MechanismEfficient KV CacheImage and Video UnderstandingDynamic Region SelectionContext Tokens

0 comments

The pith

Multimodal LLMs can match or exceed full dense attention by dynamically restricting focus to a small number of task-relevant gaze regions and using up to 90 percent fewer visual key-value entries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that current multimodal models waste computation by attending to every visual token at every generation step, whereas humans fixate only on the parts of a scene needed for the current description. Gaze Attention addresses this by first clustering visual embeddings into compact regions, each summarized by a lightweight descriptor, then letting the model pick only the most relevant clusters at each decoding step. To keep the global picture intact despite the localized focus, the method adds a small set of learnable context tokens to every image or video frame. Experiments across image and video benchmarks confirm that the resulting models perform at least as well as standard dense-attention baselines while cutting the number of visual KV entries by as much as 90 percent.

Core claim

Gaze Attention groups stored visual embeddings into compact regions represented by lightweight descriptors, selects the most relevant regions dynamically at each decoding step, restricts attention computation to those regions only, and appends learnable context tokens to preserve holistic scene information, thereby matching or surpassing the performance of dense-attention baselines while using up to 90 percent fewer visual key-value entries.

What carries the argument

Gaze Attention, which spatially groups visual embeddings into compact regions summarized by lightweight descriptors, dynamically selects relevant regions during decoding, restricts attention to them, and appends learnable context tokens for global awareness.

If this is right

Multimodal models can generate longer responses or process higher-resolution video without proportional growth in attention cost.
Inference-time memory usage for the visual KV cache drops sharply, enabling deployment on devices with limited hardware.
Task performance can improve on problems where global attention dilutes focus, because the model is forced to select only the most relevant regions.
The same selection logic can be applied at every layer or only at selected layers without changing the rest of the architecture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach may combine naturally with token-pruning or quantization methods already used for language tokens, creating larger cumulative savings.
Because region selection happens per decoding step, the method could adapt to changing user intent mid-generation, a capability dense attention lacks.
Extending the lightweight descriptors to include temporal motion cues would be a direct next step for video-only models.

Load-bearing premise

That spatially grouping embeddings into gaze regions, selecting them via lightweight descriptors, and adding context tokens is enough to retain every piece of task-critical visual information.

What would settle it

A controlled test on a benchmark that requires simultaneous awareness of many small, scattered objects where the Gaze Attention model produces measurably lower accuracy than the dense baseline while using far fewer tokens.

read the original abstract

When humans describe a visual scene, they do not process the entire image uniformly; instead, they selectively fixate on regions relevant to their intended description. In contrast, current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) attend to all visual tokens at each generation step, leading to diluted focus and unnecessary computational overhead. In this work, we introduce Gaze Attention, a novel mechanism that enables MLLMs to selectively attend to task-relevant visual regions during generation. Specifically, we spatially group visual embeddings-stored as key-value caches-into compact gaze regions, each represented by a lightweight descriptor. At each decoding step, the model dynamically selects the most relevant regions and restricts attention to them, reducing redundant computation while enhancing focus. To mitigate the loss of global context caused by localized attention, we further propose learnable context tokens appended to each image or frame, allowing the model to maintain holistic visual awareness. Extensive experiments on image and video understanding benchmarks demonstrate that Gaze Attention matches or surpasses dense-attention baselines, while using up to 90% fewer visual KV entries in the attention computation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Gaze Attention gives MLLMs a way to dynamically pick visual regions via cheap descriptors and context tokens, cutting KV entries by up to 90% while holding benchmark performance.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper shows how to make multimodal models attend only to selected parts of an image or video frame during generation instead of every token every time. They group the visual embeddings into spatial regions, each summarized by a lightweight descriptor, then let the model choose which regions to keep at each decoding step and add a few learnable context tokens to hold onto the rest of the scene. That setup delivers the reported 90% reduction in visual KV cache size with no loss on the tested benchmarks.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Gaze Attention, a mechanism for multimodal large language models that spatially groups visual embeddings into compact gaze regions, each represented by a lightweight descriptor. At each decoding step the model dynamically selects the most relevant regions to restrict attention computation, while appending learnable context tokens to preserve global visual awareness. Experiments on image and video understanding benchmarks are reported to show that the method matches or surpasses dense-attention baselines while using up to 90% fewer visual KV entries.

Significance. If the performance parity and efficiency claims hold under rigorous verification, the work could meaningfully advance efficient inference in MLLMs by reducing attention overhead in a manner inspired by human gaze behavior, with potential benefits for real-time and resource-constrained vision-language applications.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: The central efficiency claim of 'up to 90% fewer visual KV entries' is presented without error bars, statistical significance tests, or explicit ablation tables isolating the contribution of region selection versus context tokens; this directly affects verifiability of the performance-parity result.
[§3.1] §3.1 (Gaze Region Formation): The lightweight descriptors used for dynamic region selection are not ablated against stronger alternatives or against oracle selection; without such controls it remains unclear whether they reliably encode dispersed or low-salience task-critical details that the appended context tokens cannot reconstruct.
[§4.2] §4.2 (Benchmark Results): No data-selection criteria or per-benchmark variance analysis is supplied for the reported matching-or-surpassing performance; this leaves open whether the observed parity depends on particular dataset characteristics rather than the proposed mechanism.

minor comments (2)

[§3] Notation for the descriptor computation and region-selection scoring function should be introduced earlier and used consistently throughout §3.
[Figure 2] Figure 2 would benefit from an additional panel showing an example of selected versus discarded gaze regions on a sample image.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify and strengthen our presentation of Gaze Attention. Below, we address each major comment point by point, indicating the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: The central efficiency claim of 'up to 90% fewer visual KV entries' is presented without error bars, statistical significance tests, or explicit ablation tables isolating the contribution of region selection versus context tokens; this directly affects verifiability of the performance-parity result.

Authors: We agree that including error bars, statistical significance tests, and more detailed ablations would improve the verifiability of our efficiency claims. In the revised manuscript, we will report results with standard deviations from multiple random seeds, include p-values for comparisons against baselines, and add an explicit ablation table that isolates the effects of region selection, context tokens, and their combination. This will clarify the contribution of each component to the observed performance parity. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.1] §3.1 (Gaze Region Formation): The lightweight descriptors used for dynamic region selection are not ablated against stronger alternatives or against oracle selection; without such controls it remains unclear whether they reliably encode dispersed or low-salience task-critical details that the appended context tokens cannot reconstruct.

Authors: We acknowledge the value of additional controls for the lightweight descriptors. While our design prioritizes efficiency, we will add ablations comparing our descriptors to stronger alternatives (e.g., using full region features or attention-based pooling) and include an oracle selection baseline where perfect region selection is assumed. This will demonstrate the effectiveness of our lightweight approach and show that context tokens help recover global information for cases where selection is imperfect. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (Benchmark Results): No data-selection criteria or per-benchmark variance analysis is supplied for the reported matching-or-surpassing performance; this leaves open whether the observed parity depends on particular dataset characteristics rather than the proposed mechanism.

Authors: We will revise §4.2 to include explicit data-selection criteria, noting that we used standard splits from established benchmarks (e.g., VQAv2, GQA for images; MSVD, ActivityNet for videos) without cherry-picking. Additionally, we will provide per-benchmark variance analysis, including standard deviations across multiple runs and breakdowns by dataset characteristics such as image complexity or video length, to show that the performance parity holds consistently rather than being dataset-specific. revision: yes

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

The approach rests on the unproven premise that visual features can be losslessly summarized into selectable regions and that context tokens fully compensate for the resulting locality; no free parameters or external axioms are enumerated in the abstract.

invented entities (2)

Gaze regions no independent evidence
purpose: Compact descriptors for groups of visual embeddings that enable selective attention
New construct introduced to reduce KV cache size; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.
Learnable context tokens no independent evidence
purpose: Maintain global visual context when attention is restricted to local regions
Additional tokens proposed to offset information loss; no external validation given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1077 out tokens · 25832 ms · 2026-05-14T20:09:46.446658+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel (J uniqueness) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we spatially group visual embeddings... into compact gaze regions, each represented by a lightweight descriptor. At each decoding step, the model dynamically selects the most relevant regions... su_g = qj⊤du_g, Gj = TopK({su_g})
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

learnable context tokens appended to each image or frame... providing a persistent global summary

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

194 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

[1]

NeurIPS , year=

Visual Instruction Tuning , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[2]

CVPR , year=

Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning , author=. CVPR , year=
[3]

LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models

Llava-next-interleave: Tackling multi-image, video, and 3d in large multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07895 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

TMLR , year=

Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer , author=. TMLR , year=
[5]

ICML , year=

Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , author=. ICML , year=
[6]

ICCV , year=

Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training , author=. ICCV , year=
[7]

Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond

Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution

Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model's perception of the world at any resolution , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[9]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[10]

ICLR , year=

Cambrian-s: Towards spatial supersensing in video , author=. ICLR , year=
[11]

CVPR , year=

Thinking in space: How multimodal large language models see, remember, and recall spaces , author=. CVPR , year=
[12]

ICCV , year=

Scaling language-free visual representation learning , author=. ICCV , year=
[13]

NeurIPS , year=

Cambrian-1: A fully open, vision-centric exploration of multimodal llms , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[14]

CVPR , year=

Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks , author=. CVPR , year=
[15]

1952 , publisher=

The origins of intelligence in children , author=. 1952 , publisher=

1952
[16]

Clip- cap: Clip preﬁx for image captioning

Clipcap: Clip prefix for image captioning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09734 , year=

work page arXiv
[17]

ICML , year=

Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models , author=. ICML , year=
[18]

Quaestiones Disputatae de Veritate , author =
[19]

NeuIPS , year=

Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback , author=. NeuIPS , year=
[20]

NeuIPS , year=

Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences , author=. NeuIPS , year=
[21]

CVPR , year=

Rlhf-v: Towards trustworthy mllms via behavior alignment from fine-grained correctional human feedback , author=. CVPR , year=
[22]

CVPR , year=

Rlaif-v: Open-source ai feedback leads to super gpt-4v trustworthiness , author=. CVPR , year=
[23]

ACL , year=

Aligning large multimodal models with factually augmented rlhf , author=. ACL , year=
[24]

CVPR , year=

Llava-critic: Learning to evaluate multimodal models , author=. CVPR , year=
[25]

CVPR , year=

Mitigating hallucinations in large vision-language models via dpo: On-policy data hold the key , author=. CVPR , year=
[26]

ACL , year=

Mitigating hallucination in multimodal large language model via hallucination-targeted direct preference optimization , author=. ACL , year=
[27]

ICLR , year=

Chip: Cross-modal hierarchical direct preference optimization for multimodal llms , author=. ICLR , year=
[28]

EMNLP , year=

mdpo: Conditional preference optimization for multimodal large language models , author=. EMNLP , year=
[29]

ACL , year=

LPOI: Listwise Preference Optimization for Vision Language Models , author=. ACL , year=
[30]

EMNLP , year=

V-dpo: Mitigating hallucination in large vision language models via vision-guided direct preference optimization , author=. EMNLP , year=
[31]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10442 , year=

Enhancing the reasoning ability of multimodal large language models via mixed preference optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10442 , year=

work page arXiv
[32]

ICML , year=

Sft memorizes, rl generalizes: A comparative study of foundation model post-training , author=. ICML , year=
[33]

NeuIPS , year=

Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model , author=. NeuIPS , year=
[34]

TMLR , year=

Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth. TMLR , year=
[35]

ICCV , year =

Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers , author =. ICCV , year =
[36]

Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers) , year=

2019
[37]

NeuIPS , year=

Attention is all you need , author=. NeuIPS , year=
[38]

Proceedings of machine learning and systems , year=

Efficiently scaling transformer inference , author=. Proceedings of machine learning and systems , year=
[39]

ACL , year=

Analyzing multi-head self-attention: Specialized heads do the heavy lifting, the rest can be pruned , author=. ACL , year=
[40]

LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models

Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[41]

Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models

Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[42]

arXiv e-prints , pages=

The llama 3 herd of models , author=. arXiv e-prints , pages=
[43]

Qwen3 Technical Report

Qwen3 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[44]

2025 , journal=

Qwen2.5 Technical Report , author=. 2025 , journal=

2025
[45]

Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling

Expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with model, data, and test-time scaling , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05271 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[46]

ICLR , year=

Locality alignment improves vision-language models , author=. ICLR , year=
[47]

CVPR , year=

Eyes wide shut? exploring the visual shortcomings of multimodal llms , author=. CVPR , year=
[48]

ICML , year=

Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model , author=. ICML , year=
[49]

ICML , year=

Prismatic vlms: Investigating the design space of visually-conditioned language models , author=. ICML , year=
[50]

Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

Qwen2. 5-vl technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[51]

SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Features

Siglip 2: Multilingual vision-language encoders with improved semantic understanding, localization, and dense features , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14786 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[52]

DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models

Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models, 2024 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[53]

SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models

Smolvlm: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05299 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[54]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10462 , year=

The scalability of simplicity: Empirical analysis of vision-language learning with a single transformer , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10462 , year=

work page arXiv
[55]

ICCV , year=

Scaling laws for native multimodal models , author=. ICCV , year=
[56]

ICCV , year=

Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization , author=. ICCV , year=
[57]

SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learning

SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.09674 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[58]

2019 , booktitle=

GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answering , author=. 2019 , booktitle=

2019
[59]

Planting a seed of vision in large language model

Planting a seed of vision in large language model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08041 , year=

work page arXiv
[60]

MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

MME: a comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models. CoRR abs/2306.13394 (2023) , author=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[61]

ECCV , year=

Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? , author=. ECCV , year=
[62]

Language Resources and Evaluation , volume=

AI2D-RST: A multimodal corpus of 1000 primary school science diagrams , author=. Language Resources and Evaluation , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[63]

NeurIPS , year=

Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[64]

ICLR , year=

Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts , author=. ICLR , year=
[65]

CVPR , year=

Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi , author=. CVPR , year=
[66]

CVPR , year=

Towards vqa models that can read , author=. CVPR , year=
[67]

WACV , year=

Docvqa: A dataset for vqa on document images , author=. WACV , year=
[68]

ACL , year=

Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning , author=. ACL , year=
[69]

On the hidden mystery of ocr in large multimodal models

On the hidden mystery of ocr in large multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07895 , year=

work page arXiv
[70]

2024 , url=

grok , author=. 2024 , url=

2024
[71]

Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs

Kimi k1. 5: Scaling reinforcement learning with llms, 2025 , author=. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2501.12599 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[72]

ICML , year=

The platonic representation hypothesis , author=. ICML , year=
[73]

CVPR , year=

Scene parsing through ade20k dataset , author=. CVPR , year=
[74]

Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology

Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08295 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[75]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01786 , year=

Crosslingual generalization through multitask finetuning (2022) , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01786 , year=

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

CVPR , year=

Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners , author=. CVPR , year=
[77]

CVPR , year=

Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning , author=. CVPR , year=
[78]

CVPR , pages=

Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , author=. CVPR , pages=. 2009 , organization=

2009
[79]

CVPR , year=

Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learning , author=. CVPR , year=
[80]

Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , year=

Fine-tuning vision-language-action models: Optimizing speed and success , author=. Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , year=

Showing first 80 references.