Pith. sign in

hub

Prometheus: Inducing fine-grained evaluation capability in language models

19 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 15 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

19 Pith papers citing it
15 external citations · Pith
abstract

Recently, using a powerful proprietary Large Language Model (LLM) (e.g., GPT-4) as an evaluator for long-form responses has become the de facto standard. However, for practitioners with large-scale evaluation tasks and custom criteria in consideration (e.g., child-readability), using proprietary LLMs as an evaluator is unreliable due to the closed-source nature, uncontrolled versioning, and prohibitive costs. In this work, we propose Prometheus, a fully open-source LLM that is on par with GPT-4's evaluation capabilities when the appropriate reference materials (reference answer, score rubric) are accompanied. We first construct the Feedback Collection, a new dataset that consists of 1K fine-grained score rubrics, 20K instructions, and 100K responses and language feedback generated by GPT-4. Using the Feedback Collection, we train Prometheus, a 13B evaluator LLM that can assess any given long-form text based on customized score rubric provided by the user. Experimental results show that Prometheus scores a Pearson correlation of 0.897 with human evaluators when evaluating with 45 customized score rubrics, which is on par with GPT-4 (0.882), and greatly outperforms ChatGPT (0.392). Furthermore, measuring correlation with GPT-4 with 1222 customized score rubrics across four benchmarks (MT Bench, Vicuna Bench, Feedback Bench, Flask Eval) shows similar trends, bolstering Prometheus's capability as an evaluator LLM. Lastly, Prometheus achieves the highest accuracy on two human preference benchmarks (HHH Alignment & MT Bench Human Judgment) compared to open-sourced reward models explicitly trained on human preference datasets, highlighting its potential as an universal reward model. We open-source our code, dataset, and model at https://kaistai.github.io/prometheus/.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 3

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 3

polarities

background 3

representative citing papers

Self-Rewarding Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-01-18 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Iterative self-rewarding via LLM-as-Judge in DPO training on Llama 2 70B improves instruction following and self-evaluation, outperforming GPT-4 on AlpacaEval 2.0.

CAMI: Cost-Aware Agent-Guided Multi-Indexing for Semantic Retrieval

cs.IR · 2026-06-14 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

CAMI frames multi-index construction for semantic retrieval as a budgeted multi-objective portfolio problem and uses agent-guided search plus confidence-aware pruning to find high-recall configurations with reduced evaluation cost.

Are LLMs Bad at Moral Reasoning?

cs.CY · 2026-06-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Reanalyzing MoReBench by assigning LLMs the task of generating scoring rubrics shows better calibration to human rubrics and suggests stronger LLM moral reasoning than previously reported.

InfluMatch: Frontier-Quality KOL Search at 4B-Model Cost

cs.CL · 2026-07-07 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A 4B-model cascade for Thai KOL matching reaches 94.1% P@5 on 11 queries, matching a frontier model, with pairwise SimPO training transferring end-to-end while pointwise SFT+GRPO does not.

A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge

cs.CL · 2024-11-23 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

A survey on LLM-as-a-Judge that reviews reliability strategies, proposes evaluation methods, and introduces a novel benchmark for assessing such systems.

citing papers explorer

Showing 19 of 19 citing papers.