pith. sign in

hub

Learning to summarize from human feedback

24 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

24 Pith papers citing it
abstract

As language models become more powerful, training and evaluation are increasingly bottlenecked by the data and metrics used for a particular task. For example, summarization models are often trained to predict human reference summaries and evaluated using ROUGE, but both of these metrics are rough proxies for what we really care about -- summary quality. In this work, we show that it is possible to significantly improve summary quality by training a model to optimize for human preferences. We collect a large, high-quality dataset of human comparisons between summaries, train a model to predict the human-preferred summary, and use that model as a reward function to fine-tune a summarization policy using reinforcement learning. We apply our method to a version of the TL;DR dataset of Reddit posts and find that our models significantly outperform both human reference summaries and much larger models fine-tuned with supervised learning alone. Our models also transfer to CNN/DM news articles, producing summaries nearly as good as the human reference without any news-specific fine-tuning. We conduct extensive analyses to understand our human feedback dataset and fine-tuned models We establish that our reward model generalizes to new datasets, and that optimizing our reward model results in better summaries than optimizing ROUGE according to humans. We hope the evidence from our paper motivates machine learning researchers to pay closer attention to how their training loss affects the model behavior they actually want.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision

cs.CL · 2022-12-07 · conditional · novelty 8.0

An unsupervised technique extracts latent yes-no knowledge from language model activations by locating a direction that satisfies logical consistency properties, outperforming zero-shot accuracy by 4% on average across models and datasets.

Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedback

cs.LG · 2023-02-23 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A three-stage fine-tuning process uses human ratings to train a reward model and then improves text-to-image alignment by maximizing reward-weighted likelihood.

Scaling Laws for Transfer

cs.LG · 2021-02-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Effective data transferred from pre-training to fine-tuning is described by a power law in model parameter count and fine-tuning dataset size, acting like a multiplier on the fine-tuning data.

Failure Modes of Maximum Entropy RLHF

cs.LG · 2025-09-24 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Derives SimPO from MaxEnt RL and reports that MaxEnt RL in online RLHF exhibits frequent overoptimization and unstable KL dynamics across scales, unlike stable KL-constrained baselines.

A Survey of Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2023-03-31 · accept · novelty 3.0

This survey reviews the background, key techniques, and evaluation methods for large language models, emphasizing emergent abilities that appear at large scales.

citing papers explorer

Showing 24 of 24 citing papers.