Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systems

Canonical reference. 70% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

46 Pith papers citing it
16 external citations · Pith
Background 70% of classified citations
abstract

The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus for Artificial General Intelligence (ARC-AGI), introduced in 2019, established a challenging benchmark for evaluating the general fluid intelligence of artificial systems via a set of unique, novel tasks only requiring minimal prior knowledge. While ARC-AGI has spurred significant research activity over the past five years, recent AI progress calls for benchmarks capable of finer-grained evaluation at higher levels of cognitive complexity. We introduce ARC-AGI-2, an upgraded version of the benchmark. ARC-AGI-2 preserves the input-output pair task format of its predecessor, ensuring continuity for researchers. It incorporates a newly curated and expanded set of tasks specifically designed to provide a more granular signal to assess abstract reasoning and problem-solving abilities at higher levels of fluid intelligence. To contextualize the difficulty and characteristics of ARC-AGI-2, we present extensive results from human testing, providing a robust baseline that highlights the benchmark's accessibility to human intelligence, yet difficulty for current AI systems. ARC-AGI-2 aims to serve as a next-generation tool for rigorously measuring progress towards more general and human-like AI capabilities.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 dataset 3

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 37 2025 9

representative citing papers

Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark

cs.AI · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces KINA benchmark with 899 items over 261 disciplines, formal (1-1/e) coverage guarantee and bonus-on-bar tournament theorem, plus evaluations of 42 models with top score 53.17%.

Harnessing Agentic Evolution

cs.AI · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AEvo introduces a meta-agent that edits the evolution procedure or agent context based on accumulated state, outperforming baselines by 26% relative improvement on agentic benchmarks and achieving SOTA on open-ended tasks.

VCBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Venture Capital

cs.AI · 2025-09-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

VCBench is a new privacy-preserving benchmark showing LLMs like DeepSeek-V3 achieve over six times the market baseline precision in predicting founder success.

Neural Cellular Automata: From Cells to Pixels

cs.CV · 2025-06-28 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Hybrid coarse-grid NCA plus implicit decoder produces arbitrary-resolution real-time outputs for morphogenesis and texture synthesis on grids and meshes while preserving self-organization.

G-RRM: Guiding Symbolic Solvers with Recurrent Reasoning Models

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

G-RRM neural guidance reduces median conflicts to zero and delivers speedups up to 33.3x on 9x9 Sudoku for backtracking solvers when search spaces are large and solvers can overwrite imperfect hints.

Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench

cs.AI · 2026-06-23 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Using CORE-Bench as a case study, the paper shows that saturated benchmarks can still deliver insights on efficiency, reliability, model-scaffold differences, and human collaboration even after accuracy plateaus, and introduces improved benchmark versions plus a small randomized experiment demonstra

You Don't Need to Run Every Eval

cs.LG · 2026-06-22 · conditional · novelty 6.0

The benchmark score matrix of 84 models on 133 tasks is approximately rank-2; BenchPress recovers held-out scores to within 4.6 points and identifies 5-benchmark subsets that predict the full scorecard to within 3.93-4.55 points.

citing papers explorer

Showing 46 of 46 citing papers.