Pith. sign in

hub

org/abs/2203.14680

17 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 11 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

17 Pith papers citing it
11 external citations · Pith
abstract

Transformer-based language models (LMs) are at the core of modern NLP, but their internal prediction construction process is opaque and largely not understood. In this work, we make a substantial step towards unveiling this underlying prediction process, by reverse-engineering the operation of the feed-forward network (FFN) layers, one of the building blocks of transformer models. We view the token representation as a changing distribution over the vocabulary, and the output from each FFN layer as an additive update to that distribution. Then, we analyze the FFN updates in the vocabulary space, showing that each update can be decomposed to sub-updates corresponding to single FFN parameter vectors, each promoting concepts that are often human-interpretable. We then leverage these findings for controlling LM predictions, where we reduce the toxicity of GPT2 by almost 50%, and for improving computation efficiency with a simple early exit rule, saving 20% of computation on average.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 3

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 3

polarities

background 3

representative citing papers

Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering

cs.CL · 2023-08-20 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Activation Addition steers language models by adding contrastive activation vectors from prompt pairs to control high-level properties like sentiment and toxicity at inference time without training.

Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformer

cs.CL · 2022-10-13 · conditional · novelty 7.0

MEMIT scales direct memory editing in transformers from single facts to thousands of associations by optimizing MLP weight updates.

Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoders

cs.LG · 2026-05-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Adaptive elastic net SAEs (AEN-SAEs) mitigate feature starvation in SAEs by combining ℓ2 structural stability with adaptive ℓ1 reweighting, producing a Lipschitz-continuous sparse coding map that recovers global feature support under mild assumptions.

How Do Language Models Compose Functions?

cs.CL · 2025-10-02 · conditional · novelty 6.0

LLMs solve compositional factual recall either by computing intermediates or directly, with mechanism choice correlated to translation geometry in embedding spaces.

citing papers explorer

Showing 17 of 17 citing papers.