Pith. sign in

hub

Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoning

31 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 1 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

31 Pith papers citing it
1 external citations · Pith
abstract

Math reasoning has become the poster child of progress in large language models (LLMs), with new models rapidly surpassing human-level performance on benchmarks like MATH and AIME. But as math leaderboards improve week by week, it is worth asking: do these gains reflect broader problem-solving ability or just narrow overfitting? To answer this question, we evaluate over 20 open-weight reasoning-tuned models across a broad suite of tasks, including math, scientific QA, agent planning, coding, and standard instruction-following. We surprisingly find that most models that succeed in math fail to transfer their gains to other domains. To rigorously study this phenomenon, we conduct controlled experiments on Qwen3-14B models using math-only data but different tuning methods. We find that reinforcement learning (RL)-tuned models generalize well across domains, while supervised fine-tuning (SFT)-tuned models often forget general capabilities. Latent-space representation and token-space distribution shift analyses reveal that SFT induces substantial representation and output drift, while RL preserves general-domain structure. Our results suggest a need to rethink standard post-training recipes, particularly the reliance on SFT-distilled data for advancing reasoning models.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 method 2

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 24 2025 7

representative citing papers

Not only where, But when: Temporal Scheduling for RLVR

cs.LG · 2026-05-25 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Temporal scheduling of credit allocation criteria over RLVR training, using trajectory percentiles to target heterogeneous behaviors, yields more stable policy entropy and better reasoning benchmark results than static allocation.

PARTREP: Learning What to Repeat for Decoder-only LLMs

cs.CL · 2026-07-02 · conditional · novelty 6.0

PartRep selects high-NLL tokens via a lightweight early-exit gate for partial prompt repetition, retaining most full-repetition gains at 59.4% KV cache and 79% prefill FLOPs on eight benchmarks.

Scaling Participation in Modular AI Systems

cs.AI · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Modular AI systems assembled from contributed small models outperform monolithic LLMs by up to 15.4% on 15 tasks including reasoning and factuality while showing emergent problem-solving and benefits from contributor diversity.

Self-Supervised On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning Language Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SSOPD converts intra-group correct-wrong contrast into process supervision by distilling a teacher distribution from the shortest correct completion into prefixes of the longest wrong completion, improving GRPO on AIME and HMMT benchmarks.

Rotation-Preserving Supervised Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RPSFT improves the in-domain versus out-of-domain performance trade-off during LLM supervised fine-tuning by penalizing rotations in pretrained singular subspaces as a proxy for loss-sensitive directions.

Characterizing Model-Native Skills

cs.AI · 2026-04-19 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Recovering an orthogonal basis from model activations yields a model-native skill characterization that improves reasoning Pass@1 by up to 41% via targeted data selection and supports inference steering, outperforming human-characterized alternatives.

Understanding Task Transfer in Vision-Language Models

cs.CV · 2025-11-24 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Finetuning VLMs on perception tasks produces positive and negative transfers that can be mapped with a new normalized metric called Perfection Gap Factor across 13 tasks and three models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 31 of 31 citing papers.