Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems

Canonical reference. 88% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

45 Pith papers citing it
25 external citations · Pith
Background 88% of classified citations
abstract

We analyze the type of learned optimization that occurs when a learned model (such as a neural network) is itself an optimizer - a situation we refer to as mesa-optimization, a neologism we introduce in this paper. We believe that the possibility of mesa-optimization raises two important questions for the safety and transparency of advanced machine learning systems. First, under what circumstances will learned models be optimizers, including when they should not be? Second, when a learned model is an optimizer, what will its objective be - how will it differ from the loss function it was trained under - and how can it be aligned? In this paper, we provide an in-depth analysis of these two primary questions and provide an overview of topics for future research.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 8

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 8

polarities

background 7 support 1

representative citing papers

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

cs.CY · 2026-04-11 · accept · novelty 8.0

This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.

Safety from Honesty in a Disinterested AI Predictor

cs.AI · 2026-06-28 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Under consequence-invariant posterior training and sparsity of coordinated harm patterns, the training mass on dangerous guarded Predictors is bounded by C_bad times R_shell.

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

Defeat Devices in AI Systems

cs.CY · 2026-06-27 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The paper defines defeat devices in AI via a triadic test (discriminator, concealed swap, performance gap), unifies existing cases under this concept, proposes TADP detection, and claims such devices can emerge naturally in frontier models.

Behavioural Analysis of Alignment Faking

cs.AI · 2026-05-26 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Alignment faking appears across a wider range of open-weight LLMs than previously reported and is independently modulated by values, developer sycophancy, and instrumental goal guarding.

Understanding Goal Generalisation in Sequential Reinforcement Learning

cs.LG · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Empirical analysis of over 100 sequential RL training pipelines across 250+ OOD environments finds salient features drive generalization and early goals persist, with latent policy gradients simulating latent variable evolution to predict OOD behavior from training history.

Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models

cs.CR · 2026-04-01 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

World models enable efficient AI planning but create risks from adversarial corruption, goal misgeneralization, and human bias, demonstrated via attacks that amplify errors and reduce rewards on models like RSSM and DreamerV3.

citing papers explorer

Showing 45 of 45 citing papers.