Pith. sign in

Dcpo: Dynamic clipping policy optimization

12 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

12 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, existing approaches such as GRPO often suffer from zero gradients. This problem arises primarily due to fixed clipping bounds for token-level probability ratios and the standardization of identical rewards, which can lead to ineffective gradient updates and underutilization of generated responses. In this work, we propose Dynamic Clipping Policy Optimization(DCPO), which introduces a dynamic clipping strategy that adaptively adjusts clipping bounds based on token-specific prior probabilities to enhance token-level exploration, and a smooth advantage standardization technique that standardizes rewards across cumulative training steps to improve the response-level effective utilization of generated responses. DCPO achieved state-of-the-art performance on four benchmarks based on four different models. In particular, DCPO achieved an Avg@1 of 46.7 under greedy decoding and an Avg@32 of 38.8 under 32 times sampling on the AIME24 benchmark, surpassing DAPO (36.7/31.6), GRPO (36.7/32.1) and GSPO (40.0/34.9) on the Qwen2.5-Math-7B model. On the AIME25 benchmark based on Qwen2.5-14B, DCPO achieves a performance of (23.3/19.0), surpassing GRPO (13.3/10.5), DAPO (20.0/15.3) and GSPO (16.7/9.9). Furthermore, DCPO achieved an average 28% improvement in the nonzero advantage over GRPO in four models, doubled the training efficiency over DAPO, and significantly reduced the token clipping ratio by an order of magnitude compared to both GRPO and DAPO, while achieving superior performance. These results highlight DCPO's effectiveness in leveraging generated data more efficiently for reinforcement learning in large language models.

citation-role summary

background 2 other 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 11 2025 1

polarities

background 2 unclear 1

representative citing papers

Revisiting DAgger in the Era of LLM-Agents

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · conditional · novelty 6.0

DAgger-style training with turn-level policy interpolation raises 4B and 8B LLM agents to 27.3% and 29.8% on SWE-bench Verified, beating several larger published systems.

SSPO: Subsentence-level Policy Optimization

cs.CL · 2025-11-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SSPO computes policy importance ratios at the subsentence level with entropy-adjusted clipping bounds, yielding higher average scores than GRPO and GSPO on math reasoning benchmarks with Qwen models.

Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning

cs.LG · 2026-04-01 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

PIPO adds closed-loop policy-improvement feedback to RL post-training so updates that raise measured performance are reinforced and those that drop it are suppressed.

Baichuan-M4: A Clinical-Grade Medical Agent System for Continuous Care

cs.AI · 2026-06-08 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

The paper describes Baichuan-M4, a coordinated medical agent system that reports leading scores across static knowledge, dynamic consultation, long-context memory, retrieval, OCR, and multimodal tasks with a 3.3% hallucination rate.

citing papers explorer

Showing 12 of 12 citing papers.