High-redshift datasets constrain the local void gravitational redshift parameter z0 to be consistent with zero but allow the value needed for Hubble tension solution.
Cosmic radio dipole from NVSS and WENSS
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We use linear estimators to determine the magnitude and direction of the cosmic radio dipole from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) and the Westerbork Northern Sky Survey (WENSS). We show that special attention has to be given to the issues of bias due to shot noise, incomplete sky coverage and masking of the Milky Way. We compare several different estimators and show that conflicting claims in the literature can be attributed to the use of different estimators. We find that the NVSS and WENSS estimates of the cosmic radio dipole are consistent with each other and with the direction of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) dipole. We find from the NVSS a dipole amplitude of $(1.6 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-2}$ in direction $(\mathrm{RA}, \mathrm{dec})= (154^\circ \pm 21^\circ, -2^\circ \pm 21^\circ)$. This amplitude exceeds the one expected from the CMB by a factor of about 3 and is inconsistent with the assumption of a pure kinetic origin of the radio dipole at 99.5% CL.
fields
astro-ph.CO 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
First measurement of angular clustering w(theta) for radio sources at 816 MHz over 800 deg2 yields positive signal and effective bias 1.53-2.0 depending on N(z) prior.
citing papers explorer
-
Constraints on the gravitational potential from DESI DR2 BAO and its implications for the local void scenario
High-redshift datasets constrain the local void gravitational redshift parameter z0 to be consistent with zero but allow the value needed for Hubble tension solution.
-
Tracing Large-scale Structure with the MeerKLASS On-the-Fly Survey: Angular Clustering of Radio Sources at 816 MHz
First measurement of angular clustering w(theta) for radio sources at 816 MHz over 800 deg2 yields positive signal and effective bias 1.53-2.0 depending on N(z) prior.