MADE creates a contamination-resistant living benchmark for multi-label classification of medical device adverse events, with evaluations revealing model-specific trade-offs in accuracy and uncertainty quantification.
Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs through Minimum Bayes Risk: Bridging Confidence and Consistency
9 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Argus benchmark shows UQ method rankings for GUI grounding agents are stable within models across datasets but degrade across model classes and to closed-source vendors.
Propagational Proxy Voting driven by letter entropy and centered reasoning embeddings beats majority by +2.24 pp on non-trivial MMLU-Pro questions without labels or training.
Introduces functional equivalence methods and functional entropy to predict functional correctness of LLM-generated code via uncertainty quantification, outperforming NLI-based baselines in most tested settings.
DisAAD trains a 1%-sized proxy model via adversarial distillation to quantify uncertainty in black-box LLMs by aligning with their output distributions.
CAPO improves LLM calibration by up to 15% while matching or exceeding GRPO accuracy through logistic AUC loss and noise masking, enabling better abstention and scaling performance.
A Dirichlet-prior Bayesian estimator for model success probability replaces Pass@k, delivering faster-converging and more stable rankings with credible intervals on math benchmarks.
Adapts multi-layer token-level Mahalanobis distance with supervised linear regression to yield improved uncertainty scores for LLM truthfulness tasks.
Supervised fine-tuning degrades the correlation between confidence scores and output quality in language models, driven by factors like training distribution similarity rather than true quality.
citing papers explorer
-
MADE: A Living Benchmark for Multi-Label Text Classification with Uncertainty Quantification of Medical Device Adverse Events
MADE creates a contamination-resistant living benchmark for multi-label classification of medical device adverse events, with evaluations revealing model-specific trade-offs in accuracy and uncertainty quantification.
-
Uncertainty Quantification for Computer-Use Agents: A Benchmark across Vision-Language Models and GUI Grounding Datasets
Argus benchmark shows UQ method rankings for GUI grounding agents are stable within models across datasets but degrade across model classes and to closed-source vendors.
-
When Does Delegation Beat Majority? A Delegation-Based Aggregator for Multi-Sample LLM Inference
Propagational Proxy Voting driven by letter entropy and centered reasoning embeddings beats majority by +2.24 pp on non-trivial MMLU-Pro questions without labels or training.
-
Functional Entropy: Predicting Functional Correctness in LLM-Generated Code with Uncertainty Quantification
Introduces functional equivalence methods and functional entropy to predict functional correctness of LLM-generated code via uncertainty quantification, outperforming NLI-based baselines in most tested settings.
-
Estimating the Black-box LLM Uncertainty with Distribution-Aligned Adversarial Distillation
DisAAD trains a 1%-sized proxy model via adversarial distillation to quantify uncertainty in black-box LLMs by aligning with their output distributions.
-
Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning LLMs
CAPO improves LLM calibration by up to 15% while matching or exceeding GRPO accuracy through logistic AUC loss and noise masking, enabling better abstention and scaling performance.
-
Don't Pass@k: A Bayesian Framework for Large Language Model Evaluation
A Dirichlet-prior Bayesian estimator for model success probability replaces Pass@k, delivering faster-converging and more stable rankings with credible intervals on math benchmarks.
-
Token-Level Density-Based Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Eliciting Truthfulness of Large Language Models
Adapts multi-layer token-level Mahalanobis distance with supervised linear regression to yield improved uncertainty scores for LLM truthfulness tasks.
-
Confident in a Confidence Score: Investigating the Sensitivity of Confidence Scores to Supervised Fine-Tuning
Supervised fine-tuning degrades the correlation between confidence scores and output quality in language models, driven by factors like training distribution similarity rather than true quality.