VoxSafeBench reveals that speech language models recognize social norms from text but fail to apply them when acoustic cues like speaker or scene determine the appropriate response.
hub Canonical reference
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
Canonical reference. 83% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
81
Pith papers citing it
Background
83% of classified citations
abstract
This paper aims to help structure the risk landscape associated with large-scale Language Models (LMs). In order to foster advances in responsible innovation, an in-depth understanding of the potential risks posed by these models is needed. A wide range of established and anticipated risks are analysed in detail, drawing on multidisciplinary expertise and literature from computer science, linguistics, and social sciences. We outline six specific risk areas: I. Discrimination, Exclusion and Toxicity, II. Information Hazards, III. Misinformation Harms, V. Malicious Uses, V. Human-Computer Interaction Harms, VI. Automation, Access, and Environmental Harms. The first area concerns the perpetuation of stereotypes, unfair discrimination, exclusionary norms, toxic language, and lower performance by social group for LMs. The second focuses on risks from private data leaks or LMs correctly inferring sensitive information. The third addresses risks arising from poor, false or misleading information including in sensitive domains, and knock-on risks such as the erosion of trust in shared information. The fourth considers risks from actors who try to use LMs to cause harm. The fifth focuses on risks specific to LLMs used to underpin conversational agents that interact with human users, including unsafe use, manipulation or deception. The sixth discusses the risk of environmental harm, job automation, and other challenges that may have a disparate effect on different social groups or communities. In total, we review 21 risks in-depth. We discuss the points of origin of different risks and point to potential mitigation approaches. Lastly, we discuss organisational responsibilities in implementing mitigations, and the role of collaboration and participation. We highlight directions for further research, particularly on expanding the toolkit for assessing and evaluating the outlined risks in LMs.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 27
other 2
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract This paper aims to help structure the risk landscape associated with large-scale Language Models (LMs). In order to foster advances in responsible innovation, an in-depth understanding of the potential risks posed by these models is needed. A wide range of established and anticipated risks are analysed in detail, drawing on multidisciplinary expertise and literature from computer science, linguistics, and social sciences. We outline six specific risk areas: I. Discrimination, Exclusion and Toxicity, II. Information Hazards, III. Misinformation Harms, V. Malicious Uses, V. Human-Computer Inte
co-cited works
representative citing papers
A hybrid first-order then zeroth-order optimization approach improves robustness of safety-aligned LLMs while preserving utility, with layer-wise sensitivity estimation for efficiency.
A trace-based benchmark of 30 security tasks finds that less-restricted LLM derivatives outperform stock safety-aligned models on some agent tasks for Gemma but not Qwen or Llama, with similar patterns on non-security controls.
BiAxisAudit measures LLM bias on two axes—across-prompt sensitivity via factorial grids and within-response divergence via split coding—revealing that task format explains as much variance as model choice and that 63.6% of bias signals appear in only one layer.
Persona-driven workflow and interface improve automated and human-AI red-teaming of generative AI by incorporating diverse perspectives into adversarial prompt creation.
Decoding-time use of process reward models for bias mitigation raises fairness scores by up to 0.40 on a bilingual benchmark while preserving fluency across four LLMs and extends to open-ended generation with low overhead.
The paper delivers a unified framework for fairness in speech technologies by formalizing seven definitions, organizing research into three paradigms, diagnosing pipeline-specific biases, and mapping mitigations to those sources.
A systematic review of 50 studies identifies 69 LLM-assisted tasks in empirical software engineering, concentrated in data processing and analysis with gaps in human-centered integration and reproducibility reporting.
A new 7x4 taxonomy organizes agentic AI security threats by architectural layer and persistence timescale, revealing under-explored upper layers and missing defenses after surveying 116 papers.
Adaptive multi-agent LLM pipelines with bandit-based sampling achieve lower false positive rates (0.095 vs 0.159) than single-agent models on two behavioral health datasets while maintaining similar false negative rates.
Ghost-100 benchmark shows prompt tone drives hallucination rates and intensities in VLMs, with non-monotonic peaks at intermediate pressure and task-specific differences that aggregate metrics hide.
IntervenSim is an intervention-aware social network simulation that couples source interventions with crowd interactions in a feedback loop, improving MAPE by 41.6% and DTW by 66.9% over prior static frameworks on real-world events.
This paper proposes a five-dimension ethical design space for front-end biometric translation in sensor-fused health AI agents, including adaptive disclosure as a guardrail against hallucinations and biofeedback loops.
Large Reasoning Models override their own initial safety recognition during multi-step reasoning in a failure mode called Self-Jailbreak, which Chain-of-Guardrail mitigates through targeted trajectory-level step interventions.
Gato is a multi-modal, multi-task, multi-embodiment generalist policy using one transformer network to handle text, vision, games, and robotics tasks.
OPT releases open decoder-only transformers up to 175B parameters that match GPT-3 performance at one-seventh the carbon cost, along with code and training logs.
Flamingo models reach new state-of-the-art few-shot results on image and video tasks by bridging frozen vision and language models with cross-attention layers trained on interleaved web-scale data.
Grad Detect uses internal gradient patterns from one inference pass to predict LLM hallucinations and abstention, outperforming confidence and sampling baselines on Q&A benchmarks with most signal in the final five layers.
Introduces HRC model for game-theoretic decomposition of preferences into orthogonal transitive and cyclic components, paired with DSPPO for dynamic Nash-seeking alignment, reporting gains over BT and GPM baselines on RewardBench and downstream LLM evaluations.
Emergent misalignment arises from overtraining after primary task convergence and is preventable by early stopping, which retains 93% of task performance on average.
Toxicity benchmarks for LLMs produce inconsistent results when task type, input domain, or model changes, revealing intrinsic evaluation biases.
Ethics testing is introduced as a systematic approach to generate tests that identify software harms induced by unethical behavior in generative AI outputs.
Transient Turn Injection is a new attack that evades LLM moderation by spreading harmful intent over multiple isolated turns using automated agents.
Align-Cultura introduces the CULTURAX dataset and shows that culturally fine-tuned LLMs improve joint HHH scores by 4-6%, cut cultural failures by 18%, and gain 10-12% efficiency with minimal leakage.
citing papers explorer
-
LLM-Assisted Empirical Software Engineering: Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
A systematic review of 50 studies identifies 69 LLM-assisted tasks in empirical software engineering, concentrated in data processing and analysis with gaps in human-centered integration and reproducibility reporting.
-
Ethics Testing: Proactive Identification of Generative AI System Harms
Ethics testing is introduced as a systematic approach to generate tests that identify software harms induced by unethical behavior in generative AI outputs.
-
AI Failures in the Eyes of the Downstream Developer: A First Look at Concerns, Practices, and Challenges
Mixed-methods study maps downstream developers' concerns, practices, and challenges with AI failures in PTM-based software.
-
Human-aligned AI Model Cards with Weighted Hierarchy Architecture
Introduces CRAI-MCF, an eight-module framework distilling 217 parameters from 240 projects into a quantitative sufficiency criterion for cross-model LLM comparison grounded in Value Sensitive Design.