Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?

Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

26 Pith papers citing it
Background 100% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic systems, often comprising multiple models, complex tool invocations, and orchestration protocols, substantially outperform monolithic agents. Yet this very sophistication amplifies their fragility, making them more prone to system failure. Pinpointing the specific agent or step responsible for an error within long execution traces defines the task of agentic system failure attribution. Current state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, however, remain strikingly inadequate for this challenge, with accuracy generally below 10%. To address this gap, we propose AgenTracer, the first automated framework for annotating failed multi-agent trajectories via counterfactual replay and programmed fault injection, producing the curated dataset TracerTraj. Leveraging this resource, we develop AgenTracer-8B, a lightweight failure tracer trained with multi-granular reinforcement learning, capable of efficiently diagnosing errors in verbose multi-agent interactions. On the Who&When benchmark, AgenTracer-8B outperforms giant proprietary LLMs like Gemini-2.5-Pro and Claude-4-Sonnet by up to 18.18%, setting a new standard in LLM agentic failure attribution. More importantly, AgenTracer-8B delivers actionable feedback to off-the-shelf multi-agent systems like MetaGPT and MaAS with 4.8-14.2% performance gains, empowering self-correcting and self-evolving agentic AI.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 5

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 26

roles

background 4

polarities

background 4

representative citing papers

Holistic Evaluation and Failure Diagnosis of AI Agents

cs.AI · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A span-decomposed evaluation framework for AI agents achieves state-of-the-art results on GAIA and SWE-Bench with up to 3.5x gains in localization accuracy by breaking traces into independent per-span judgments.

Do Coding Agents Understand Least-Privilege Authorization?

cs.CR · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Coding agents struggle to infer least-privilege file permissions by omitting needed accesses while granting unused or sensitive ones, but Sufficiency-Tightness Decomposition improves sensitive-task success by up to 15.8% and reduces attacks.

ClawForge: Generating Executable Interactive Benchmarks for Command-Line Agents

cs.AI · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

ClawForge is a generator framework that creates reproducible executable benchmarks for command-line agents under state conflict, with ClawForge-Bench showing frontier models reach at most 45.3% strict accuracy and that state inspection drives most performance gaps.

Uncertainty Propagation in LLM-Based Systems

cs.SE · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

This paper introduces a systems-level conceptual framing and a three-level taxonomy (intra-model, system-level, socio-technical) for uncertainty propagation in compound LLM applications, along with engineering insights and open challenges.

A Sober Look at Agentic Misalignment in Automated Workflows

cs.AI · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Agentic misalignment in multi-agent systems arises from generic utilities causing posterior collapse; Agentic Evidence Attribution using self-reflection or weak-to-strong generalization provides context-specific evidence to align agent posteriors.

citing papers explorer

Showing 26 of 26 citing papers.