LLMs can provide cost-effective annotation of credibility in Danish asylum texts but produce inconsistent errors that vary by model and prompt, requiring checks beyond single-model accuracy.
State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluation
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
5
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 5representative citing papers
Single-prompt evaluations of instruction-tuned embedding models misrepresent performance and allow any model to be ranked first by favorable prompt choice.
LPDS quantifies difficulty of logic-preserving problem variations and searches for the hardest ones, producing up to 5x larger performance drops than random sampling and better robustness gains from fine-tuning on difficult examples.
Instructions trigger a production-centered mechanism in language models, with task-specific information stable in input tokens but varying strongly in output tokens and correlating with behavior.
LLMs disperse meaning-preserving prompts internally instead of clustering them, which produces an excessively high upper bound on output log-probability differences via Taylor expansion and Cauchy-Schwarz.
citing papers explorer
-
Instructions Shape Production of Language, not Processing
Instructions trigger a production-centered mechanism in language models, with task-specific information stable in input tokens but varying strongly in output tokens and correlating with behavior.
-
Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity
LLMs disperse meaning-preserving prompts internally instead of clustering them, which produces an excessively high upper bound on output log-probability differences via Taylor expansion and Cauchy-Schwarz.