Derives an exact telescoping decomposition of the naive RLVR reward-design estimator into null, elicitation, and reward-design terms on a tabular-GRPO simulator, measures the components across prior strengths, and validates via pre-registered factorial experiments plus re-audits of prior papers.
super hub Canonical reference
Holistic Evaluation of Language Models
Canonical reference. 84% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
156
Pith papers citing it
Background
84% of classified citations
abstract
Language models (LMs) are becoming the foundation for almost all major language technologies, but their capabilities, limitations, and risks are not well understood. We present Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) to improve the transparency of language models. First, we taxonomize the vast space of potential scenarios (i.e. use cases) and metrics (i.e. desiderata) that are of interest for LMs. Then we select a broad subset based on coverage and feasibility, noting what's missing or underrepresented (e.g. question answering for neglected English dialects, metrics for trustworthiness). Second, we adopt a multi-metric approach: We measure 7 metrics (accuracy, calibration, robustness, fairness, bias, toxicity, and efficiency) for each of 16 core scenarios when possible (87.5% of the time). This ensures metrics beyond accuracy don't fall to the wayside, and that trade-offs are clearly exposed. We also perform 7 targeted evaluations, based on 26 targeted scenarios, to analyze specific aspects (e.g. reasoning, disinformation). Third, we conduct a large-scale evaluation of 30 prominent language models (spanning open, limited-access, and closed models) on all 42 scenarios, 21 of which were not previously used in mainstream LM evaluation. Prior to HELM, models on average were evaluated on just 17.9% of the core HELM scenarios, with some prominent models not sharing a single scenario in common. We improve this to 96.0%: now all 30 models have been densely benchmarked on the same core scenarios and metrics under standardized conditions. Our evaluation surfaces 25 top-level findings. For full transparency, we release all raw model prompts and completions publicly for further analysis, as well as a general modular toolkit. We intend for HELM to be a living benchmark for the community, continuously updated with new scenarios, metrics, and models.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 22
dataset 2
other 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Language models (LMs) are becoming the foundation for almost all major language technologies, but their capabilities, limitations, and risks are not well understood. We present Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) to improve the transparency of language models. First, we taxonomize the vast space of potential scenarios (i.e. use cases) and metrics (i.e. desiderata) that are of interest for LMs. Then we select a broad subset based on coverage and feasibility, noting what's missing or underrepresented (e.g. question answering for neglected English dialects, metrics for trustworthiness).
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
AI model builders mostly highlight unique benchmarks that act as flexible narrative tools for market positioning rather than standardized scientific measurements.
EnergyAgentBench is a new benchmark with 70 task variants that evaluates LLM agents on live energy data for datacenter siting, long-horizon optimization, and causal grid diagnosis.
MCP-Atlas is a new benchmark with 1000 tasks on production MCP servers that uses claim-level scoring to evaluate LLM agents on realistic multi-step tool-use competency.
Continuous auditing creates an unavoidable cover regime in which static auditors cannot simultaneously eliminate coverage and granularity failures, shown via new policies, strategies, and a reproducible simulator.
A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.
CLQT is a new closed-loop, cost-aware benchmark that diagnoses LLM trading agent capabilities through strategy-consistent metrics and hash-verifiable trails rather than outcome rankings.
BehaviorBench is a benchmark for foundation models on behavioral tasks that reveals fine-tuned behavioral models outperform general models on distributional alignment while general models lead on individual-level accuracy.
MAC-Bench is a new adversarial benchmark that converts legal texts into executable scenarios via the SERV pipeline to measure procedural compliance in multi-agent LLM systems using CSR and MG metrics.
Invariant Gradient Alignment uses Logical Isomer Sets and a Continuous Gradient Conflict Mask to tighten OOD generalization bounds and boost empirical performance over ERM in reasoning distillation.
Face-Feature Tuning is a label-free logit remapping method that reduces FPR/TPR gaps across groups in deepfake detection while preserving overall accuracy.
RealClawBench turns 281 real OpenClaw sessions into reproducible tasks that preserve the original distribution and shows the best of 14 models solves only 65.8 percent.
OR-Space is a benchmark for LLM agents performing full-lifecycle optimization tasks across Build, Revise, and Explain modes in executable multi-artifact workspaces.
SiDP distributes model weights across a DP group with WaS and CaS modes to increase KV cache capacity by up to 1.8x and end-to-end throughput by up to 1.5x over vLLM on H20/H200/B200 GPUs for offline LLM inference.
Language models display brittle safety by failing to adapt when context flips reverse action safety, with standard guardrails blind to consequence-flip scenarios.
Introduces the Grounded Observer framework that applies robotics-inspired formal constructs for runtime constraint enforcement on foundation model interaction trajectories in socially sensitive domains.
GRASP aggregates stable local LLM interaction judgments into global argument rankings via a convergent attack-defense propagation operator on interaction graphs, yielding higher reproducibility than holistic judging and no correlation with human convincingness.
SpikeProphecy decomposes spike-count forecasting performance into temporal fidelity, spatial pattern accuracy, and magnitude-invariant alignment, revealing reproducible brain-region predictability rankings and a sub-Poisson evaluation floor across seven model families on 105 Neuropixels sessions.
Develops a causal framework unifying generative AI fairness with standard ML, with new decompositions, identification conditions, and estimators demonstrated on LLM race and gender bias.
Hebatron is the first open-weight Hebrew MoE LLM adapted from Nemotron-3, reaching 73.8% on Hebrew reasoning benchmarks while activating only 3B parameters per pass and supporting 65k-token context.
LLMs routinely produce unsupported causal stories for personal sensing anomalies, and richer evidence or constrained prompts do not reliably eliminate this epistemic overreach.
Medical VLMs frequently select negated options that contradict visible chest X-ray findings, achieving only ~30% accuracy on direct presence probes, but a post-hoc consistency verifier raises accuracy above 95%.
iTRIALSPACE generates realistic virtual lesion trials on lung CTs that isolate performance drivers and show strong transfer of model rankings to real clinical data (ρ=0.93).
LLMSpace is the first framework to jointly model operational and embodied carbon for LLM inference on LEO satellites, incorporating radiation-hardened hardware, peripheral systems, and workload patterns such as prefill-decode behavior.
citing papers explorer
-
Measuring Representation Robustness in Large Language Models for Geometry
LLMs display accuracy gaps of up to 14 percentage points on the same geometry problems solely due to representation choice, with vector forms consistently weakest and a convert-then-solve prompt helping only high-capacity models.
-
MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
MMLU-Pro is a revised benchmark that makes language model evaluation harder and more stable by using ten options per question and emphasizing reasoning over simple knowledge recall.
-
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models
Repeating training data up to 4 epochs yields negligible loss increase versus unique data for fixed compute, and a new scaling law accounts for the decaying value of repeated tokens and excess parameters.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt utility.