pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback

Canonical reference. 84% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

353 Pith papers citing it
Background 84% of classified citations
abstract

As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase we sample from an initial model, then generate self-critiques and revisions, and then finetune the original model on revised responses. In the RL phase, we sample from the finetuned model, use a model to evaluate which of the two samples is better, and then train a preference model from this dataset of AI preferences. We then train with RL using the preference model as the reward signal, i.e. we use 'RL from AI Feedback' (RLAIF). As a result we are able to train a harmless but non-evasive AI assistant that engages with harmful queries by explaining its objections to them. Both the SL and RL methods can leverage chain-of-thought style reasoning to improve the human-judged performance and transparency of AI decision making. These methods make it possible to control AI behavior more precisely and with far fewer human labels.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 86 baseline 3 method 3 dataset 1 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase we sample from an initial model, then generate self-critiques and revisions, and then finetune the original model on revised

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Instruction Tuning with GPT-4

cs.CL · 2023-04-06 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

GPT-4-generated instruction data produces superior zero-shot performance in finetuned LLaMA models versus prior state-of-the-art data.

Measuring Safety Alignment Effects in Autonomous Security Agents

cs.CR · 2026-05-19 · conditional · novelty 7.0

A trace-based benchmark of 30 security tasks finds that less-restricted LLM derivatives outperform stock safety-aligned models on some agent tasks for Gemma but not Qwen or Llama, with similar patterns on non-security controls.

Agent Bazaar: Enabling Economic Alignment in Multi-Agent Marketplaces

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Agent Bazaar is a multi-agent simulation framework that identifies economic failure modes in LLM agents, proposes stabilizing harnesses, and shows that targeted RL training can produce a 9B model with superior economic alignment compared to frontier models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 353 citing papers.