ref [41] · 2601.07859 · notice #6227 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
C. Accettura, et al., Towards a muon collider, European Physical Jour- nal C 83 (2023) 864.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x
Reference change · event page
Reference changes · DOI
Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.
This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.
ref [41] · 2601.07859 · notice #6227 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
C. Accettura, et al., Towards a muon collider, European Physical Jour- nal C 83 (2023) 864.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x
ref [5] · 2604.17514 · notice #6225 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Accettura, C., Adams, D., Agarwal, R., et al. : Towards a muon collider. Euro- pean Physical Journal C 83(10), 864 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x
ref [19] · 2604.23805 · notice #6224 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
C.Accettura,etal.,Towardsamuoncollider,Eur.Phys.J.C83(9)(2023)864,[Erratum:Eur.Phys.J.C84,36(2024)].arXiv:2303.08533, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x
ref [83] · 2605.07565 · notice #6226 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
Towards a muon collider. The European Physical Journal C , author=. 2023 , month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x , abstractNote=
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
Towards a muon collider. The European Physical Journal C, author=. 2023, month=sep, pages=. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x, abstractNote=
ref [27] · 2605.21590 · notice #6228 · dispute
Raw extraction · bibliography line
C. Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider , Eur. Phys. J. C 83(9), 864 (2023), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)], 2303.08533
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
C. Accettura et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 83(9), 864 (2023), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)], 2303.08533
Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.