pith. sign in

arxiv: 1405.7085 · v2 · pith:C3MXMELCnew · submitted 2014-05-27 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CR· stat.ML

Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Bounds

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML
keywords algorithmsboundsoptimallosslowererrorfunctionfunctions
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we initiate a systematic investigation of differentially private algorithms for convex empirical risk minimization. Various instantiations of this problem have been studied before. We provide new algorithms and matching lower bounds for private ERM assuming only that each data point's contribution to the loss function is Lipschitz bounded and that the domain of optimization is bounded. We provide a separate set of algorithms and matching lower bounds for the setting in which the loss functions are known to also be strongly convex. Our algorithms run in polynomial time, and in some cases even match the optimal non-private running time (as measured by oracle complexity). We give separate algorithms (and lower bounds) for $(\epsilon,0)$- and $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy; perhaps surprisingly, the techniques used for designing optimal algorithms in the two cases are completely different. Our lower bounds apply even to very simple, smooth function families, such as linear and quadratic functions. This implies that algorithms from previous work can be used to obtain optimal error rates, under the additional assumption that the contributions of each data point to the loss function is smooth. We show that simple approaches to smoothing arbitrary loss functions (in order to apply previous techniques) do not yield optimal error rates. In particular, optimal algorithms were not previously known for problems such as training support vector machines and the high-dimensional median.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Derives a federated van Trees lower bound under total clientwise sample-level zCDP for parameter estimation with squared l2 loss in federated learning protocols with arbitrary public-transcript interactions.

  2. DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DPrivBench shows that top LLMs handle basic differential privacy mechanisms but fail on advanced algorithms, exposing gaps in automated DP reasoning.

  3. DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    DPrivBench is a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs on differential privacy reasoning, with results showing good performance on textbook mechanisms but substantial failures on advanced algorithms.

  4. Crowding Out The Noise: Algorithmic Collective Action Under Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Differential privacy reduces algorithmic collective action effectiveness, with formal lower bounds on success probability depending on collective size and privacy parameters, plus experimental verification on neural nets.

  5. Preventing overfitting in deep learning using differential privacy

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Differential privacy techniques can help prevent overfitting and improve generalization in deep neural networks.