pith. sign in

arxiv: 1407.4762 · v1 · pith:EKD3I36Fnew · submitted 2014-07-17 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· math.NA

Certification and the Potential Energy Landscape

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath.NA
keywords stationaryapproximationnumericalpointactualbasincertificationconverge
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Typically, there is no guarantee that a numerical approximation obtained using standard nonlinear equation solvers is indeed an actual solution, meaning that it lies in the quadratic convergence basin. Instead, it may lie only in the linear convergence basin, or even in a chaotic region, and hence not converge to the corresponding stationary point when further optimization is attempted. In some cases, these non-solutions could be misleading. Proving that a numerical approximation will quadratically converge to a stationary point is termed \textit{certification}. In this report, we provide details of how Smale's $\alpha$-theory can be used to certify numerically obtained stationary points of a potential energy landscape, providing a \textit{mathematical proof} that the numerical approximation does indeed correspond to an actual stationary point, independent of the precision employed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.