Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:IXARQGQRrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about QAOA's performance beyond its lowest-depth variant. An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization. We provide an in-depth study of the performance of QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit non-adiabatic operations. Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasi-optimal $p$-level QAOA parameters in $O(\text{poly}(p))$ time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires $2^{O(p)}$ optimization runs to achieve similar performance. We then benchmark QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps. The comparison reveals that QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize non-adiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps. Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of QAOA. When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization will be important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations, but accessible on near-term devices. We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks
Classical RNNs trained on small instances provide parameter initializations for QAOA and VQE that reduce total optimization iterations and generalize across problem sizes.
-
Simulating quantum circuits with a neural statebank
A compact neural statebank based on autoregressive Transformers simulates 34-qubit quantum circuits with ~0.01 infidelity using 0.3 million parameters, outperforming tested approximate simulators.
-
Frustration-Induced Expressibility Limitations in Variational Quantum Algorithms
Geometric frustration in a square-lattice Ising model with diagonal couplings produces strongly inhomogeneous correlations that standard Hamiltonian-inspired variational ansatze cannot capture efficiently, increasing ...
-
Analysis of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm under Realistic Noise in Superconducting Qubits
Noise characteristics of superconducting qubits bound the optimal QAOA depth, contrary to the expectation that higher depth always improves performance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.