Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.00830 v5 pith:NHL3SSFO submitted 2019-06-03 cs.CR stat.ML

DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networks

classification cs.CR stat.ML
keywords modelwatermarkingextractiondawnmodelssurrogatepredictiontheft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training machine learning (ML) models is expensive in terms of computational power, amounts of labeled data and human expertise. Thus, ML models constitute intellectual property (IP) and business value for their owners. Embedding digital watermarks during model training allows a model owner to later identify their models in case of theft or misuse. However, model functionality can also be stolen via model extraction, where an adversary trains a surrogate model using results returned from a prediction API of the original model. Recent work has shown that model extraction is a realistic threat. Existing watermarking schemes are ineffective against IP theft via model extraction since it is the adversary who trains the surrogate model. In this paper, we introduce DAWN (Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networks), the first approach to use watermarking to deter model extraction IP theft. Unlike prior watermarking schemes, DAWN does not impose changes to the training process but it operates at the prediction API of the protected model, by dynamically changing the responses for a small subset of queries (e.g., <0.5%) from API clients. This set is a watermark that will be embedded in case a client uses its queries to train a surrogate model. We show that DAWN is resilient against two state-of-the-art model extraction attacks, effectively watermarking all extracted surrogate models, allowing model owners to reliably demonstrate ownership (with confidence $>1- 2^{-64}$), incurring negligible loss of prediction accuracy (0.03-0.5%).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data Provenance for Image Auto-Regressive Generation

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A post-hoc detection framework exploits generation-induced patterns in autoregressive image outputs to enable provenance tracing across multiple IAR models without altering the generation process.

  2. Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Empirical benchmarks show distribution similarity between adaptation and pretraining data increases practical privacy leakage in DP-adapted LLMs at fixed theoretical guarantees, with LoRA providing strongest protectio...