pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11474 · v1 · pith:IHWTB5WSnew · submitted 2019-06-27 · ⚛️ physics.comp-ph · astro-ph.EP· physics.chem-ph

Collisional excitation of NH(3{Sigma}-) by Ar: A new ab initio 3D potential energy surface and scattering calculations

D. Prudenzano , F. Lique , R. Ramachandran , L. Bizzocchi , P. Caselli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.comp-ph astro-ph.EPphysics.chem-ph
keywords potential energy surfacecollisional excitationNH-Ar systemrate coefficientsclose-coupling calculationsfine-structure levelsab initio PESvan der Waals complex
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new three-dimensional PES for NH-Ar that includes NH vibration supplies collisional excitation rates up to 350 K.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes a fresh three-dimensional potential energy surface for the NH molecule colliding with argon atoms, explicitly allowing the NH bond to vibrate during the interaction. This surface is then used in quantum close-coupling calculations to determine how collisions excite the fine-structure levels of NH, first producing energy-dependent cross sections and then temperature-dependent rate coefficients. Such rates help model the populations of NH in environments where collisions with heavier atoms matter, such as certain atmospheric layers or dense astrophysical regions. The work covers collision energies to 3000 cm^{-1} and temperatures to 350 K, and the resulting propensity rules are compared with those seen in lighter partner systems. The authors also check the few existing experimental data points against their theoretical values.

Core claim

We have calculated a new three-dimensional Potential Energy Surface (PES), which explicitly includes the NH bond vibration, using the open-shell CCSD(T) method with aug-cc-pVXZ (X=T,Q,5) basis sets extrapolated to the complete basis set limit. We calculated collisional excitation cross sections of the fine-structure levels of NH by Ar for energies up to 3000 cm^{-1}. After thermal average of the cross sections, we have then obtained the rate coefficients for temperatures up to 350 K. The propensity rules between the fine-structure levels are in good agreement with those of similar collisional systems.

What carries the argument

The new three-dimensional potential energy surface computed ab initio at the CCSD(T)/CBS level, which supplies the interaction potential for the close-coupling scattering calculations that produce the cross sections and rates.

If this is right

  • The new rate coefficients can be inserted directly into radiative transfer models for NH in regions where argon collisions contribute.
  • Propensity rules derived from the calculations indicate which fine-structure transitions are more probable than others in NH-Ar encounters.
  • Inclusion of the NH vibrational coordinate in the PES allows the rates to remain valid at higher collision energies than rigid-rotor surfaces.
  • The same computational route can be repeated for other rare-gas partners to build a consistent set of NH excitation data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The rates may prove most useful for laboratory plasma or discharge environments where argon is abundant, rather than typical interstellar conditions.
  • Because the PES is three-dimensional, it could later support calculations that also track vibrational excitation or relaxation of NH during collisions.
  • If the computed rates match future experiments well, the same basis-set extrapolation strategy can be applied to similar open-shell hydride systems without major changes.

Load-bearing premise

The CCSD(T) method with aug-cc-pVXZ basis sets and CBS extrapolation produces a PES accurate enough that the resulting close-coupling cross sections and rates are reliable for the fine-structure levels without further empirical adjustment.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of state-to-state rate coefficients for NH fine-structure excitation by Ar at one or more temperatures between 50 K and 300 K that deviates significantly from the computed values would falsify the claim of sufficient accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11474 by D. Prudenzano, F. Lique, L. Bizzocchi, P. Caselli, R. Ramachandran.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Definition of the Jacobi coordinate system. The ori [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Equilibrium angles at different NH bond lengths. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Collisional excitation cross sections of NH by Ar from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Thermal dependence of the rate coefficients of NH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Scaling relation for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Collisional excitation of light hydrides is important to fully understand the complex chemical and physical processes of atmospheric and astrophysical environments. Here, we focus on the NH(X3{\Sigma}-)-Ar van der Waals system. First, we have calculated a new three-dimensional Potential Energy Surface (PES), which explicitly includes the NH bond vibration. We have carried out the ab initio calculations of the PES employing the open-shell single- and double-excitation couple cluster method with noniterative perturbational treatment of the triple excitations. To achieve a better accuracy, we have first obtained the energies using the augmented correlation-consistent aug-cc-pVXZ (X = T, Q, 5) basis sets and then we have extrapolated the final values to the complete basis set limit. We have also studied the collisional excitation of NH(X3{\Sigma}-)-Ar at the close-coupling level, employing our new PES. We calculated collisional excitation cross sections of the fine-structure levels of NH by Ar for energies up to 3000 cm-1 . After thermal average of the cross sections, we have then obtained the rate coefficients for temperatures up to 350 K. The propensity rules between the fine-structure levels are in good agreement with those of similar collisional systems, even though they are not as strong and pronounced as for lighter systems, such as NH-He. The final theoretical values are also compared with the few available experimental data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports computation of a new three-dimensional ab initio potential energy surface (PES) for the NH(X³Σ⁻)–Ar van der Waals system that explicitly includes the NH bond vibration coordinate. The PES is obtained at the CCSD(T) level using aug-cc-pVXZ (X = T, Q, 5) basis sets extrapolated to the complete-basis-set limit. Close-coupling scattering calculations on this PES then yield state-to-state collisional excitation cross sections for the fine-structure levels of NH up to 3000 cm⁻¹; thermal averaging produces rate coefficients up to 350 K. Results are compared with the limited available experimental data and with propensity rules observed in related systems such as NH–He.

Significance. If the PES accuracy is as expected from the CCSD(T)/CBS protocol, the work supplies updated, vibrationally inclusive data needed for modeling NH in astrophysical and atmospheric environments. The explicit inclusion of the NH stretch is a clear advance over prior 2D surfaces, the methodology is parameter-free, and the direct comparison to experiment provides a falsifiable validation step. These strengths make the dataset useful for the community even if the numerical improvements over earlier surfaces are modest.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that propensity rules 'are not as strong and pronounced as for lighter systems, such as NH-He' is left qualitative; a short quantitative comparison (e.g., ratio of ΔN=0 vs. ΔN=1 cross sections) would strengthen the claim.
  2. [Results/Discussion] The manuscript states that 'the final theoretical values are also compared with the few available experimental data,' but the main text should explicitly identify which experimental datasets are used and report the level of agreement (e.g., mean relative deviation) rather than leaving it implicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The referee's summary correctly describes the new 3D PES, the CCSD(T)/CBS methodology, the close-coupling calculations, and the comparison to experiment and to NH-He.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard ab initio workflow

full rationale

The paper computes a 3D PES via CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVXZ + CBS extrapolation (explicitly including NH vibration) then performs close-coupling scattering to obtain cross sections and rates. No parameters are fitted to the NH-Ar target observables, no self-citations justify the central method or uniqueness, and no prediction reduces to a prior fit by construction. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and external experimental data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard quantum-chemistry approximations and extrapolation procedures rather than new fitted constants or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption CCSD(T) with perturbative triples and aug-cc-pVXZ basis sets yields energies that can be reliably extrapolated to the complete basis set limit
    Invoked in the description of the PES construction
  • domain assumption Close-coupling quantum scattering on the resulting PES produces accurate state-to-state cross sections for fine-structure levels
    Invoked for the scattering calculations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5824 in / 1284 out tokens · 18571 ms · 2026-05-25T14:13:26.072209+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Friedrich \ and\ author J

    author author B. Friedrich \ and\ author J. M. \ Doyle ,\ @noop journal journal ChemPhysChem \ volume 10 ,\ pages 604 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Egorov , author W

    author author D. Egorov , author W. Campbell , author B. Friedrich , author S. Maxwell , author E. Tsikata , author L. Van Buuren , \ and\ author J. Doyle ,\ @noop journal journal Eur. Phys. J. D \ volume 31 ,\ pages 307 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    author author M. H. \ Alexander , author P. J. \ Dagdigian , \ and\ author D. Lemoine ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 95 ,\ pages 5036 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    author author J. L. \ Rinnenthal \ and\ author K.-H. \ Gericke ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 116 ,\ pages 9776 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Krems , author H

    author author R. Krems , author H. Sadeghpour , author A. Dalgarno , author D. Zgid , author J. K os , \ and\ author G. Cha asi \'n ski ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 68 ,\ pages 051401 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Cybulski , author R

    author author H. Cybulski , author R. Krems , author H. Sadeghpour , author A. Dalgarno , author J. K os , author G. Groenenboom , author A. van der Avoird , author D. Zgid , \ and\ author G. Cha asi \'n ski ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 122 ,\ pages 094307 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Stoecklin ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author T. Stoecklin ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 80 ,\ pages 012710 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Tobo a , author F

    author author R. Tobo a , author F. Dumouchel , author J. K os , \ and\ author F. Lique ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 134 ,\ pages 024305 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Dumouchel , author J

    author author F. Dumouchel , author J. K os , author R. Tobo a , author A. Bacmann , author S. Maret , author P. Hily-Blant , author A. Faure , \ and\ author F. Lique ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 137 ,\ pages 114306 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Ramachandran , author J

    author author R. Ramachandran , author J. K os , \ and\ author F. Lique ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 148 ,\ pages 084311 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    author author J. L. \ Rinnenthal \ and\ author K.-H. \ Gericke ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 113 ,\ pages 6210 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Kerenskaya , author U

    author author G. Kerenskaya , author U. Schnupf , author M. C. \ Heaven , author A. van der Avoird , \ and\ author G. C. \ Groenenboom ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 846 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    Bouhafs \ and\ author F

    author author N. Bouhafs \ and\ author F. Lique ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 143 ,\ pages 184311 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    author author P. J. \ Dagdigian ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 90 ,\ pages 6110 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page 1989

  15. [15]

    author author R. A. \ Kendall , author G. Cha asi \'n ski , author J. K os , author R. Bukowski , author M. W. \ Severson , author M. Szczȩ \'s niak , \ and\ author S. M. \ Cybulski ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 108 ,\ pages 3235 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    author author S. M. \ Cybulski , author R. Burcl , author G. Chal/asi \'n ski , \ and\ author M. Szczȩ \'s niak ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 103 ,\ pages 10116 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    Cybulski ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author S. Cybulski ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 91 ,\ pages 7048 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    Kalugina , author F

    author author Y. Kalugina , author F. Lique , \ and\ author S. Marinakis ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 13500 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Lique ,\ @noop title Communication: Rotational excitation of hcl by h: Rigid rotor vs

    author author F. Lique ,\ @noop title Communication: Rotational excitation of hcl by h: Rigid rotor vs. reactive approaches , \ ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Hampel , author K

    author author C. Hampel , author K. A. \ Peterson , \ and\ author H.-J. \ Werner ,\ 10.1016/0009-2614(92)86093-W journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 190 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(92)86093-w 1992

  21. [21]

    author author J. D. \ Watts , author J. Gauss , \ and\ author R. J. \ Bartlett ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 98 ,\ pages 8718 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    o ppl, Y. Liu, A. W. Lloyd, R. A. Mata, A. J. May, S. J. McNicholas, W. Meyer, M. E. Mura, A. Nicklass, D. P. O'Neill, P. Palmieri, K. Pfl\

    @noop note H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby, M. Sch\" u tz , P. Celani, T. Korona, R. Lindh, A. Mitrushenkov, G. Rauhut, K. R. Shamasundar, T. B. Adler, R. D. Amos, A. Bernhardsson, A. Berning, D. L. Cooper, M. J. O. Deegan, A. J. Dobbyn, F. Eckert, E. Goll, C. Hampel, A. Hesselmann, G. Hetzer, T. Hrenar, G. Jansen, C. K\" o ppl, Y. Liu...

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    author author S. F. \ Boys \ and\ author F. d. \ Bernardi ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 553 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    work page 1970

  24. [24]

    author author T. H. \ Dunning Jr ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 90 ,\ pages 1007 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    author author K. A. \ Peterson , author D. E. \ Woon , \ and\ author T. H. \ Dunning Jr ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 100 ,\ pages 7410 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page 1994

  26. [26]

    \ Werner , author B

    author author H.-J. \ Werner , author B. Follmeg , \ and\ author M. H. \ Alexander ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 89 ,\ pages 3139 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    work page 1988

  27. [27]

    author author D. T. \ Colbert \ and\ author W. H. \ Miller ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 96 ,\ pages 1982 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    \ Werner \ and\ author P

    author author H.-J. \ Werner \ and\ author P. J. \ Knowles ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 89 ,\ pages 5803 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    @noop note J. M. Hutson, BOUND computer code, version 5 (1993), distributed by Collaborative Computational Project No. 6 of the Science and Engineering Research Council (UK). Stop

    work page 1993

  30. [30]

    Jansen , author B

    author author G. Jansen , author B. A. \ Hess , \ and\ author P. E. \ Wormer ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 214 ,\ pages 103 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    work page 1993

  31. [31]

    Gordy \ and\ author R

    author author W. Gordy \ and\ author R. L. \ Cook ,\ @noop title Microwave molecular spectra \ ( publisher Wiley, ,\ year 1984 ) NoStop

    work page 1984

  32. [32]

    Lique , author A

    author author F. Lique , author A. Spielfiedel , author M.-L. \ Dubernet , \ and\ author N. Feautrier ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 123 ,\ pages 134316 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    author author J. M. \ Hutson \ and\ author S. Green ,\ @noop ( year 1994 ),\ note molscat computer code, version 14 (1994), distributed by Collaborative Computational Project No. 6 of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) NoStop

    work page 1994

  34. [34]

    Lewen , author S

    author author F. Lewen , author S. Br \"u nken , author G. Winnewisser , author M. S ime c kov \'a , \ and\ author S . Urban ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy \ volume 226 ,\ pages 113 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    author author L. N. \ Smith , author D. J. \ Malik , \ and\ author D. Secrest ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 71 ,\ pages 4502 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    work page 1979

  36. [36]

    author author K. M. \ Christoffel \ and\ author J. M. \ Bowman ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 78 ,\ pages 3952 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    work page 1983

  37. [37]

    author author M. H. \ Alexander \ and\ author P. J. \ Dagdigian ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 79 ,\ pages 302 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    Orlikowski ,\ @noop journal journal Mol

    author author T. Orlikowski ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 56 ,\ pages 35 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    Lique ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author F. Lique ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys \ volume 132 ,\ pages 044311 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010