Finding Generalizable Evidence by Learning to Convince Q&A Models
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BWM4SQSErecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We propose a system that finds the strongest supporting evidence for a given answer to a question, using passage-based question-answering (QA) as a testbed. We train evidence agents to select the passage sentences that most convince a pretrained QA model of a given answer, if the QA model received those sentences instead of the full passage. Rather than finding evidence that convinces one model alone, we find that agents select evidence that generalizes; agent-chosen evidence increases the plausibility of the supported answer, as judged by other QA models and humans. Given its general nature, this approach improves QA in a robust manner: using agent-selected evidence (i) humans can correctly answer questions with only ~20% of the full passage and (ii) QA models can generalize to longer passages and harder questions.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning to summarize from human feedback
Reinforcement learning on a reward model trained from human summary comparisons produces summaries humans prefer over supervised fine-tuning or human references on TL;DR and transfers to CNN/DM.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.