Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What Question Answering can Learn from Trivia Nerds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.14464 v3 pith:NUIRJQTE submitted 2019-10-31 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords questionsansweringquestionanswercommunityresearchtriviacreating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In addition to the traditional task of getting machines to answer questions, a major research question in question answering is to create interesting, challenging questions that can help systems learn how to answer questions and also reveal which systems are the best at answering questions. We argue that creating a question answering dataset -- and the ubiquitous leaderboard that goes with it -- closely resembles running a trivia tournament: you write questions, have agents (either humans or machines) answer the questions, and declare a winner. However, the research community has ignored the decades of hard-learned lessons from decades of the trivia community creating vibrant, fair, and effective question answering competitions. After detailing problems with existing QA datasets, we outline the key lessons -- removing ambiguity, discriminating skill, and adjudicating disputes -- that can transfer to QA research and how they might be implemented for the QA community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools