Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Assessing Intelligence in Artificial Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.02909 v1 pith:Q2SZMADS submitted 2020-06-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords neuralnetworkefficiencynetworksperformanceaccuracyartificialbalance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop of metrics to assess network architectures that balance neural network size and task performance. To this end, the concept of neural efficiency is introduced to measure neural layer utilization, and a second metric called artificial intelligence quotient (aIQ) was created to balance neural network performance and neural network efficiency. To study aIQ and neural efficiency, two simple neural networks were trained on MNIST: a fully connected network (LeNet-300-100) and a convolutional neural network (LeNet-5). The LeNet-5 network with the highest aIQ was 2.32% less accurate but contained 30,912 times fewer parameters than the highest accuracy network. Both batch normalization and dropout layers were found to increase neural efficiency. Finally, high aIQ networks are shown to be memorization and overtraining resistant, capable of learning proper digit classification with an accuracy of 92.51% even when 75% of the class labels are randomized. These results demonstrate the utility of aIQ and neural efficiency as metrics for balancing network performance and size.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools