REVIEW 3 cited by
Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery
read the original abstract
Future quantum computers will require quantum error correction for faithful operation. The correction capabilities come with an overhead for performing fault-tolerant logical operations on the encoded qubits. One of the most resource efficient ways to implement logical operations is lattice surgery, where groups of physical qubits, arranged on lattices, can be merged and split to realize entangling gates and teleport logical information. Here, we report on the experimental realization of lattice surgery between two topologically encoded qubits in a 10-qubit ion trap quantum information processor. In particular, we demonstrate entanglement between two logical qubits and we implement logical state teleportation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Genuine Multipartite Entanglement between Logical Qubits via Cross-Code Lattice Surgery
Cross-code lattice surgery between surface and 3D colour codes yields certified logical GHZ and |CCZ> GME plus arbitrary logical rotations on a trapped-ion processor.
-
Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates
Logical error rates in [[7,1,3]] and [[12,2,4]] codes are suppressed 9.8-800 times below physical rates on trapped-ion hardware, with repeated correction cycles approaching the error rate of two physical CNOTs.
-
Magic State Injection on IBM Quantum Processors Above the Distillation Threshold
Experimental demonstration of logical |H_L> and |T_L> magic states with fidelities 0.8806 and 0.8665 on IBM superconducting hardware using a qubit-efficient surface code embedding, with reported error thresholds above...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.