Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Latent Bandits Revisited

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.08714 v1 pith:PBKBTRIY submitted 2020-06-15 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

Latent Bandits Revisited

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords latentagentstatealgorithmsbanditofflinesettingactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A latent bandit problem is one in which the learning agent knows the arm reward distributions conditioned on an unknown discrete latent state. The primary goal of the agent is to identify the latent state, after which it can act optimally. This setting is a natural midpoint between online and offline learning---complex models can be learned offline with the agent identifying latent state online---of practical relevance in, say, recommender systems. In this work, we propose general algorithms for this setting, based on both upper confidence bounds (UCBs) and Thompson sampling. Our methods are contextual and aware of model uncertainty and misspecification. We provide a unified theoretical analysis of our algorithms, which have lower regret than classic bandit policies when the number of latent states is smaller than actions. A comprehensive empirical study showcases the advantages of our approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.